Alaska Airlines Unveils First-Ever Safety Video: Does It Hint At New Destination?

Alaska Airlines has just debuted its first safety video in its 94 year history, and there are some noteworthy things about it (thanks to Lester for flagging this)…

Alaska’s new Boeing 787 safety video now screening

In recent times, we’ve seen Alaska Airlines commence long haul flights out of Seattle (SEA), which is made possible by Alaska Air Group’s acquisition of Hawaiian Airlines. Specifically, Alaska is acquiring Boeing 787s (some from Hawaiian, and some new), with the goal of serving a dozen global destinations out of Seattle by 2030.

Up until recently, Alaska only operated narrow body planes, and none of those have seat back TVs. Therefore in its entire history, the airline never had a safety video on its own branded aircraft… until now.

Alaska’s new safety video is now being shown on seat back TVs on all 787 flights. The video has a global theme and features over 100 Alaska employees, highlighting Seattle, as well as the destinations the airline flies to, which is a common direction airlines take with safety videos nowadays.

That’s not all, though. On long haul flights out of Seattle, Alaska CEO Ben Minicucci is now featured in a welcome video. This is specifically about the 787 and Alaska’s global growth ambitions, so it’s not quite as much of a pep talk as you’ll get from Delta CEO Ed Bastian, about how you’re in the presence of greatness when you step onboard a Delta plane.

Did Alaska hint at a new destination in the safety video?

As you can see, the safety video cuts between showcasing Seattle, and promoting global destinations. The video features London, Rome, Japan (not Tokyo, but Mount Fuji), Seoul, and… Sydney?!

One of those isn’t like the other one, as Alaska doesn’t actually fly to Sydney (Hawaiian does, but that’s not relevant to this). Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I have a hard time imagining that Alaska is just adding random cities to the video, and instead, I suspect this reflects that this will be one of the carrier’s next long haul destinations out of Seattle.

That’s not terribly surprising, though Seattle doesn’t have the same advantageous geography for flights across the South Pacific as it does for flights across the North Pacific, especially when you consider where people are connecting from. But still, it seems not at all surprising that Sydney would be in the pipeline.

Make of it what you will, but in an Alaska Air Group Investor Day presentation in 2024, the airline highlighted some long haul destinations it’s most likely to add, and you can find that below.

Possible Alaska long haul destinations out of Seattle

Bottom line

Alaska Airlines has just released its first safety video, which is being screened on Boeing 787 flights out of Seattle. The video promotes Seattle and the carrier’s long haul destinations, and I think it’s well done and pleasant, without being anything too memorable. To me, the most interesting thing is how it features Sydney, a destination Alaska doesn’t fly to… yet.

What do you make of Alaska’s new Boeing 787 safety video?

Conversations (43)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Steve_from_Seattle Platinum

@timdunn--You mentioned the possibility of DL operating SEA-SYD flights should AS do so. That move would certainly be in the same spirit as DL's addition of BCN and FCO flights from SEA in response to AS's FCO flights. However, there is a big difference in adding SYD: it would cannibalize DL's schedule to Australia from LAX in that SEA passengers have connected via LAX for decades. While we have seen a lot of moves from DL to defend its turf in the Battle of Seattle, SEA-SYD on DL seems more like a kamikaze mission than a battle plan, particularly if AS gets into the oneworld JV. It seems like DL might do better to push its multiple Oz destinations nonstop from LAX, available with one stop from SEA and elsewhere. Of course, QF has many more nonstop destinations from SYD, but if memory serves, the domestic and international terminals at SYD are on opposite sides of the airfield and connections there might not be as convenient as at LAX--or ar least no more convenient.

0
‼ 0
SEAGuy Guest

SEA-AKL!!! Now that would be something

0
‼ 0
PDS Guest

Considering the VX DNA and their ground breaking safety videos (yes plural) of years gone by, AS couldn't have gone down a more predictable, staid route with their first attempt. Disappointing!

0
‼ 0
eaci Guest

The safety dance video was a safety video, wasn't it?

0
‼ 0
Tim Dunn Diamond

wow... just wow. Imagine waking up and finding that you have been the subject of multiple people's dreams during the time you slept. I clearly have infiltrated social media to such an extent that some can't participate without thinking about me. As for the actual subject of this article, it is relevant that HA flies to SYD and forms part of AS' world. The notion that the HA brand and the extra cost of marketing the HA brand will last very much longer is nothing more than a pinky promise. It would be a whole lot easier just to just slap "Hawaaian, part of Alaska Air" and be done with another round of duplicate costs. As expected, AS (who foots the bills for HA) is paying the industry's highest costs for jet fuel now that SIN is no longer a cheap place to buy fuel. AS' fuel costs are off the charts not in the realm of allowing AS to be profitable as long as this little game of thrones goes on in the Middle East. and SEA-SYD is what does make sense as AS will likely join the AA/oneworld JVs in time. the only question is whether DL (since they got mentioned by Ben and in a number of replies) decides to launch SEA-SYD as well. it was notable that AS was quick to point out that SEA-NRT is profitable but can't say the same about SEA-ICN. as much as some have dreamed about AS being turned into a global hub controlled by AS, I suspect that we will see AS and DL split the global markets just as we have seen them split the domestic market with both claiming "wins"

1
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published