Middle East Airlines & Syrian Airspace

I’m currently planning my first ever trip to Beirut, and am in the process of booking flights. I’m curious what you guys make of this situation.

My plan is to fly Middle East Airlines to Lebanon, both because they offer the most flights there, and also because they’re a SkyTeam airline that I haven’t yet reviewed. But every time I write about MEA, something about the airline is brought up.

Specifically, Middle East Airlines uses Syrian airspace for their flights. A vast majority of airlines avoid this airspace nowadays, due to the risk of air strikes. For example, looking at a flight from Beirut to Dubai, here’s the route Middle East Airlines takes (this is per Flightradar24):

And here’s the route Emirates takes:

Virtually every international government organization issuing warnings regarding the danger of using Syrian airspace, and almost all airlines avoid that airspace. As far as I know, the exceptions are Syrian Air, Iraqi Airways, and Middle East Airlines. But actually, now that I’m looking at a flight map, it looks like there’s a Qatar Airways flight over the North of Syria right now, which is interesting.

Would this cause me to avoid MEA? Probably not. I’ve written before about how I don’t put much thought into airline safety, though I will say that I think I generally take bigger issue with what seems like a reckless decision against all safety advisories, rather than some general minor differences in safety otherwise.

Still, I’m taking family on this trip, and I don’t want them to feel uncomfortable if they start Googling about the airline. I was originally going to fly MEA from Paris to Beirut to Dubai, but now I think I’ll fly MEA from Paris to Beirut (where there’s limited “exposure” to that airspace), and then Emirates from Beirut to Dubai, just to cover my bases in case they decide to Google. 😉

I do find MEA’s stance on this interesting, though. Do they believe there’s not a serious risk of an air strike, even when other airlines do? Have they done a cost-benefit analysis and decided the risk is too low, and they’re better off saving the time and fuel?

I’m curious what you guys make of this — would you be willing to fly MEA? If not, is it because you perceive there’s an actual risk, or on principle, because they’re not adhering to basic international safety standards in this regard?

Conversations (37)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Fed UP Member

Go ahead. Fly through Syria and Iraqi airspace, oblivious to the dangers involved. Enjoy your trip.

0
‼ 0
Alex Wohl Guest

I’ve flown dubai to beirut several times with MEA and flydubai. MEA is much better but obviously Emirates provides a much better expirence. The saftey risk is very minimal and the fact that you’ll be in Beirut is the bigger factor if you’re concerned about safety (still minimal).

0
‼ 0
Alex Mas Guest

"and felt completely safe" It is very debatable how to define "safe" in the first place (without using a word "feeling") "Feeling safe" is yet another level of abstraction. It has very little to do with your statistical chances of getting into trouble, it is 99% related to your prescription of the situation, which for most people is formed by the news, which in turn are thriving on providing information about some extraordinary events (that's in the best case scenario, when they are not making up facts altogether) 35000 people dying in car crashes in US alone is not a news. 150 people dying in air accident is a news (because it doesn't happen that often) Actually 10 people dying in train crash is even bigger news, because this is extremely rare event. Talk about "feelings" ...

0
‼ 0
marc Diamond

Just ask yourself how many airliners have been brought down over Syria since the beginning of the war and then make an informed decision. By the way tourism is actually beginning to return to Syria and many of the hotels in Damascus are full.

0
‼ 0
Jordan Guest

For those who wish to believe what CNN, Fox News, BBC spout out then exactly what is going down in Syria is the truth. The actual reality from many is much much different, MEA as a local carrier knows this and just gets on with it over Syria. I would fly across Syrian airspace, BUT understand those, the many who wish not to. I think taking MEA from CDG is a better choice, although one could point to the bombing of CDG-CAI not that long ago! Perhaps MEA from LHR is a better more comfortable option? Chat with a Middle Eastern friend and you will hear an entirely different reality on Syria.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published