Is It “Unfair” To Earn Elite Status With Credit Cards?

Credit cards are hugely lucrative businesses for airline and hotel loyalty programs, particularly in the United States. As a result, we’ve increasingly seen travel brands provide pathways to elite status with credit cards. In some cases you can get elite status just for having a credit card, while in other cases you have to spend a certain amount. Is that fair, though?

Some people object to earning status with credit card

Twitter user @myfamiliamusica poses the question of whether it’s “fair” to Hyatt’s “real clients” that some people earn Globalist status without sleeping one night in a Hyatt hotel, instead using co-branded credit cards.

I’ve seen similar arguments made with other loyalty programs, so this objection to people earning status in a non-traditional way is nothing new. Let’s address this topic broadly, because it’s an interesting one…

Is credit card elite status unfair to loyal guests?

Yes, people earning status with credit cards is “fair”

I always find the argument that it’s “unfair” to award status with credit cards to be a bit odd. Airline and hotel loyalty programs don’t award status through credit card spending out of the kindness of their hearts, but rather they do it because it’s profitable.

As much as I’m often not a fan of the extent to which corporations can get greedy, I think it’s objectively unfair for a publicly traded company to not maximize shareholder value (with limits, of course). Why does it make sense for airlines and hotels to award status for credit card spending? Well, because it’s profitable to do so, for two main reasons…

The economics of credit card status make sense

Since this is what was brought up on Twitter, let’s use World of Hyatt Globalist status as an example. For “real clients” (as it’s phrased in the question), earning this status requires accruing 100,000 base points (equivalent to $20,000 of spending at Hyatt properties) or 60 qualifying elite nights in a calendar year.

While $20,000 is a lot to spend with one business per year, how much of that would actually go to Hyatt? Well, the exact arrangements between Hyatt and individual hotels is confidential, but here are some of the main considerations:

  • Hyatt has management and franchise agreements for a vast majority of its properties, and doesn’t actually own them; royalty and marketing fees are a small percentage of the room rate
  • Not only is revenue for Hyatt a small percentage of room rates, but there’s a cost to World of Hyatt for providing benefits offered to members, ranging from free night awards, to confirmed suite upgrades
  • Another major reason Hyatt invests so much in its loyalty program isn’t necessarily because the clients as such make Hyatt that much money, but rather because the way that Hyatt lures hotel owners to become a Hyatt is by proving it has a robust loyalty program and distribution network

The point is, if you’re spending $20,000 per year with Hyatt as a Globalist, you’re not contributing that amount to the company’s bottom line. In reality, only a small percentage of that actually goes to Hyatt.

Now, what about someone who earns World of Hyatt Globalist status exclusively through credit card spending, without actually staying at a Hyatt? Well, they’d have to spend $120K-140K per year on a Hyatt credit card to earn Globalist status.

Credit cards make money in three ways — interchange fees (around 2%, give or take), annual fees, and financing charges. That money is split between three parties — you have the loyalty program (World of Hyatt), the bank (Chase), and the payment processor (Visa). If you assume 2% return on $120K-140K of spending, you’re looking at $2,400-2,800 in revenue. That’s not all going to Hyatt, but Hyatt does get a not-insignificant portion of that.

In the end, I suspect the impact on Hyatt’s bottom line will be roughly comparable for a “real client” earning Globalist status through stays, and one earning Globalist status through credit card spending.

Hotel stays aren’t particularly high margin for hotel groups

There are further benefits to having engaged members

The example presented on Twitter is of someone earning Globalist status without staying at a single Hyatt. Well:

  • Then you shouldn’t care as a fellow Globalist member, because the person isn’t really competing much with you for benefits
  • The consumer isn’t very savvy if they’re earning elite status purely through credit card spending, because there’s probably a better return on spending to be had with another method if you’re not actually going to be benefiting from the status

That being said, the concept of making it easier for a customer to earn elite status with a credit card makes a lot of sense. Both staying at hotels and spending on a credit card is profitable to Hyatt, so giving customers the opportunity to take a hybrid approach to earning status is logical:

  • Generally speaking, loyalty program elite members spend more at hotels than non-elite members
  • The ability to partly qualify for status through credit card spending might cause someone to seek out a Hyatt when they travel, when they wouldn’t otherwise do that

From the perspective of loyalty program executives, it’s all about how they can generate direct profits, and how they can influence consumer behavior to generate incremental revenue. I’d say the logic very much checks out with credit card elite status.

People are more likely to stay at Hyatts if they have status

Bottom line

While I totally understand why some people may not like it, we’re increasingly seeing loyalty programs make status attainable through credit card spending. That’s because qualifying for status through credit card spending is profitable and fairly easy money for loyalty programs, while actually giving an airline or hotel consistent business is pretty low margin.

Admittedly there’s probably a bigger question here about what’s “fair.” Unfortunately life isn’t fair, but that’s a basic assumption we go off of. Conversely to the credit card point, many would argue that it’s not “fair” that some people have a company that will pay for them to spend $20K+ per year with Hyatt, while others don’t…

Where do you stand on earning elite status with credit cards?

Conversations (82)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Bertrand Guest

I would rather look at it in a different way. Of course one can ask if it is fairer to earn miles with a credit card or by travelling but asking this question already assumes that everyone can do it and has the choice. If there is anything unfair in this, it is that not everyone has the choice because co-branded credit cards are not available everywhere. For example there is no Marriott card available in France so to renew my Titanium I really have to stay 75 nights. And I can say the same about most programs. In my opinion if there is anything unfair it is that the thresholds are the same for everyone in the world while all the credit cards allowing to reach them more easily are not available everywhere in the world.

0
‼ 0
Unanimous Guest

It is fair because those that can should and those that can't should try harder. The status is available to all. Just because you may not be able to achieve now, it is not unfair, because at some point you might just be able to achieve it. For that you should then be rewarded.

0
‼ 0
Eskimo Guest

People need to realize, life isn't fair or equal. Stop trying to one size fit all the world. Some will be better, some will be worse. Some will be equal, some will be discriminated. Some will be Marxists, some will be Capitalists. Some will be Democrats, some will be Republicans. Can we all stop forcing personal ideology to everyone else, accept each others difference, and live in peace.

1
‼ 0
JetSetFly Guest

People need to realize that these days airlines and hotels have award programs NOT loyalty programs. Businesses have loyalty to their shareholders NOT customers. Period. To them, it’s about extracting as much money off customers as possible with some vague promise of benefits “if available”. If you realize that, then it is no longer a question of what’s fair or not. People need to step back and look at the real picture. As for it’s not fair that Americans getting multiple points for a dollar, in reality is Americans are paying extra for those points. A hamburger should cost $5 but it is marketed at $6 because somebody has got to pay for that interchange fee. It’s certainly isn’t going to be the restaurant owner. The people who looses out in the end are poorest Americans who don’t qualify for credit cards and general population who don’t know how to play mileage games. People who reads this site consistently are the ones who’s laughing to the bank so to speak. If Europeans want to pay more for their goods, then surely they should be allowed to get in the fun. You can’t have it both ways….ie. law restricting high interchange fees while complaining the other side of the pond gets more points per dollar.

0
‼ 0
Rock DeAugustine Guest

I find it hilarious that Europeans thinking American having a credit card status is unfair. They're all quite happy to decry all other aspects of Americans society, and crow how quality of life is so much better in Europe with subsidized health care, guaranteed vacation time, seven and a half hour work days etc. I think the small percentage of the American population that carries these credit cards and actually goes to Europe and uses them can be forgiven... Remember Europeans, Americans don't travel... Right?

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published