Why Are Airplane Seats Called Suites, And Which Airline Started The Trend?

Why Are Airplane Seats Called Suites, And Which Airline Started The Trend?

7

Some time back, a reader asked me a question about why first and business class seats with doors are often referred to as “suites.” By definition, a suite is a succession of something, like two or more rooms forming a larger space. An airplane seat is generally just one space, but might be surrounded by walls and have some sort of a door, so where exactly does that expression come from?

It’s a fair question, and I think the backstory is quite interesting, so let’s discuss this a bit.

Airlines have conditioned us to use the term “suites”

On the most basic level, many airlines have marketed their premium airplane seats as suites. This is true in business class (British Airways Club Suites, Delta One Suites, Qatar Airways Qsuites, etc.) and first class (on more airlines than I can count).

British Airways Club Suites business class

Generally this refers to seats that have doors, though there are exceptions, like Japan Airlines’ Sky Suites, which don’t feature doors.

Japan Airlines Sky Suite business class

There’s no doubt that on some level the term has just been used long enough that we have come to accept it without questioning it much.

It’s not unlike how the term “social distancing” was used during the coronavirus pandemic, in place of physical distancing. When you get in an elevator and there’s signage, shouldn’t it ask you to maintain your physical distance, rather than social distance? That of course assumes elevators aren’t the center of your social life. I digress…

Some airlines deserve credit for marketing their premium products uniquely while still being accurate. For example, All Nippon Airways’ business class is called The Room, which I think is a fair descriptor for a business class seat with a door.

All Nippon Airways The Room business class

Meanwhile Etihad Airways’ A380 first class is called The Apartment, which also seems fair, since an apartment can be just one room.

Etihad Airways The Apartment first class

However, neither “room” nor “apartment” strike me as terribly aspirational terms. Arguably the only “real” suite in commercial aviation is The Residence on Etihad Airways, which features three rooms — a living room, a bedroom, and a bathroom.

Etihad Airways The Residence living room
Etihad Airways The Residence bedroom
Etihad Airways The Residence bathroom

The first airlines to use “suite” to describe seats

So, which airlines were first to start referring to their airplane seats as suites? As far as I know, the very first airline was Emirates, around 2004, when it started flying the Airbus A340-500 with first class seats that had doors (it was honestly remarkably similar to the carrier’s first class product today).

I can kind of see how Emirates was the airline to make that jump, as it also installed minibars at all first class seats, and marketed its “dine on demand” as “room service.”

Singapore Airlines really took that to the next level in 2007, when it started taking delivery of its Airbus A380s. The airline marketed the forward cabin on these planes not as first class, but as Suites Class, so that’s really when the term truly went mainstream (the below cabin is the second generation “Suites Class” product).

Singapore Airlines The Suites first class

So that’s where the term originated, but of course over the past roughly two decades, we’ve seen the use of the term spread massively.

What’s the logic of the suites term, though?

For as long as flat beds have been around on airplanes, airlines have been trying to market a hotel-like experience. The idea is that you fall asleep in one city, and wake up in another, having gotten a good night of sleep. British Airways has been doing this for decades now, as you can see in the below ad.

Brussels Airlines even markets its long haul travel experience as “a boutique hotel in the air.”

I think the adaption of the term “suite” is simply an extension of that. Suites are (generally) the best accommodations you’ll find at hotels, so not only do airlines want you to believe that you’re in a hotel, but they want you to believe that you’re enjoying the best accommodation by being in a suite.

For that matter, I think both airlines and hotels misuse the term “suite” in the same way:

  • A junior suite that has just one room without a separate living room isn’t really a suite, is it?
  • If you’re going to consider it a suite because it has a bathroom, then isn’t every hotel room a suite?
  • Instead hotels use the term suite to suggest that there’s a sleeping area and a living area (even if in the same room), and I think airlines are going for something similar; your “suite” can be used as a place to dine, lounge, relax, or sleep

Bottom line

It’s interesting how airlines widely use the term “suite” to describe first and business class seats on planes that (typically) have doors. I think it’s just a term we’ve come to accept even if it’s not terribly logical.

I’d speculate that the term comes from airlines trying to market their premium experiences as being hotel-like, and “suite” is a term that everyone is familiar with at hotels, and it sounds luxurious.

What’s your take on airplane seats being referred to as “suites?”

Conversations (7)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. justindev Guest

    Just marketing gimmick via which they can charge a premium and idiot consumers pay the premium.

    It's similar to airlines in the USA using the nomenclature First Class for a domestic product that is comparable to premium economy internationally - if that much. Airlines would not be able to profit as much, if they were to just call it what it is - premium economy.

  2. E39 Diamond

    Something so nostalgic about the previous F suites on SQ's a380s, I miss them

  3. Timtamtrak Diamond

    Suite manta ray of Santa Fe, the reality is the use of language in terms of marketing a product loses value with each passing year. I’m not for over-regulating this kind of thing because context and semantics matter, but companies can get away with calling products pretty much whatever they want now. A 300-room “boutique” hotel offering a “bespoke” experience to every guest… riiiight.

  4. Will Guest

    What qualifies as an airplane junior suite?

  5. Eskimo Guest

    I think the idea is that your seat is a separate bedroom with doors (and false sense of privacy, there isn't any) separating you from the rest of the cabin.
    Hence, the term suite.

    So technically, every other seats without doors can potentially be marketed as "junior suites"?

    DeltaOne junior suites on their dreadful 767. Tim's gonna love this fluff.

  6. 1990 Guest

    It's basically whether there's a 'door' or not. LOL.

    1. 1990 Guest

      And, for those 'in the know,' remember: "Don't slam the f-in' door!" --Winnebago Man

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

justindev Guest

Just marketing gimmick via which they can charge a premium and idiot consumers pay the premium. It's similar to airlines in the USA using the nomenclature First Class for a domestic product that is comparable to premium economy internationally - if that much. Airlines would not be able to profit as much, if they were to just call it what it is - premium economy.

0
E39 Diamond

Something so nostalgic about the previous F suites on SQ's a380s, I miss them

0
Timtamtrak Diamond

<b>Suite manta ray of Santa Fe</b>, the reality is the use of language in terms of marketing a product loses value with each passing year. I’m not for over-regulating this kind of thing because context and semantics matter, but companies can get away with calling products pretty much whatever they want now. A 300-room “boutique” hotel offering a “bespoke” experience to every guest… riiiight.

0
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,527,136 Miles Traveled

39,914,500 Words Written

42,354 Posts Published