Will US Airlines Need To Reinvent Their Business Models?

A longtime OMAAT reader messaged me an interesting question, which is something I’ve been wondering about as well. I figure it makes for an interesting discussion…

US airlines don’t really directly make money flying

Here’s an interesting question about the fact that even profitable US airlines don’t directly make money transporting passengers:

I’ve been sitting on this question for a while and was wondering if you had any thoughts. Earlier this year, it was reported that CASM (cost per available seat mile) for American, Delta, Southwest, and United, was higher than RASM (revenue per available seat mile) in 2024. While that’s partially due to aircraft shortages in some cases, that’s still not great. 

Obviously, they were profitable because of their credit cards and frequent flyer programs, and that’s where my question starts. As points continue to get devalued, lounges get increasingly packed, and elite status gets harder to attain (and requires more credit spending, if getting status just from credit cards), can airlines count on their frequent flyer programs as their main revenue generators in the long run, or will they will need to look elsewhere? 

If so, where do you see airlines turning to? It seems unlikely they could turn these type of profits just from flying alone. 

I’d also add that as a result of frequent increases in requirements to earn elite status, devaluations in the value of actually having elite status, and award redemption devaluations, airlines face another headwind, which is that they’ve probably caused a lot of folks in their 20s and 30s to become “free agents” when it comes to airline loyalty (as they’ve only really traveled in an era with declining value in being loyal to a specific airline), which could cause the value of frequent flyer programs to decline over time as well. 

In 2024, the “big four” US carriers had over $200 billion in revenue, and combined, they had net income of around $8 billion, and operating income of around $14 billion. All four airlines had higher CASM than RASM. United was the closest to breaking even (16.7 cents CASM vs. 16.66 cents RASM), while Delta was the most profitable, but had quite a gap (19.3 cents CASM vs. 17.65 cents RASM).

Of course, the reality of the “big four” US carriers essentially earning their profits through non-flying means makes it tough to maintain a competitive airline industry. Smaller airlines don’t get the same opportunities with their frequent flyer programs, so how are the supposed to compete, and turn a fair profit?

It’s worth noting that this is all still a fairly new trend. Pre-pandemic, RASM was higher than CASM at profitable US airlines. However, we’ve seen a massive increase in costs (particularly labor costs), and this has changed the economics of the industry.

One way that airlines are improving their CASM is by flying larger, more fuel efficient jets, like the A321neo. While that helps with costs, it also means there are more seats to fill, and that can be a challenge in some markets, and puts downward pressure on fares.

United is closest to turning a profit flying planes

What does this reality mean for the future of airlines?

I find this all to be an excellent question, and I don’t actually have a great answer, other than saying that I have the same question. I guess a few thoughts come to mind:

  • At this point, airline labor costs are unlikely to decrease, and if anything, they’ll keep going up, given that newly negotiated contracts include incremental pay increases in the coming years
  • The major US carriers aren’t even directly making money flying passengers during what I’d consider to be among the best of times, and that says nothing of the potential impact of any sort of an economic downturn
  • Consumers often like to label airlines as greedy, and that’s not fair, as this is one of the most difficult industries in the world; I think we sometimes see poor decisions made by airline executives, but the airline industry is hardly greedy

I don’t think airlines will be able to reinvent themselves in any sort of a meaningful way, beyond just continuing to do everything possible to monetize their customer base. I mean, you know it’s a tough time for the industry when Southwest, the United States’ most long term profitable airline, throws in the towel and says “hey, let’s be just like everyone else,” while not having first class or long haul flying.

The way I view it, the future of US airline profitability comes down to two things…

I think more industry consolidation is inevitable

I know it’s not a popular take, but I think that one way that industry unprofitability will be addressed is through further consolidation. There’s a general belief out there that “oh, industry consolidation is done, and a thing of the past.” However, consolidation has been happening for decades, and I think it will continue to be the case going forward.

There’s simply not room in the market for so many players all trying to undercut one another, with increasingly limited differentiation (look at Southwest copying the business models of other carriers, all while ultra low cost carriers try to become more full service). Airfare will need to go up somewhat.

Take Spirit, as an example. JetBlue tried to take over the airline, and that takeover was ultimately blocked by regulators, in order to preserve competition in the industry. But an airline can only have a negative 20% operating margin for so long, before something’s gotta give. Of course we all want low fares, but shareholders can only subsidize those for so long, before bankruptcy comes knocking…

Airlines can only sustain losses for so long

Airlines will keep trying to monetize their customers

Frequent flyer programs started as a cost center to get people to be loyal to an airline, but of course they’ve taken on a life of their own, and have now become the most profitable part of US airlines. Ultimately airlines have access to a huge membership base, and there are all kinds of things they can market to members. Of course credit cards are the most profitable, but there are other opportunities as well.

So I think airlines will keep trying to do that. However, personally I’m a bit more skeptical of airlines’ ambitions to grow their loyalty revenue. Some US airlines expect that their frequent flyer program revenue will increase by up to 50% in the coming years, and I just don’t think that’s realistic.

On the one hand, interest in travel is probably at an all-time high in recent years, and there are more people willing to splurge and spend their disposable income on premium travel experiences. On the other hand, consumers have a lot more choices, and the increased profitability of airline frequent flyer programs is contingent on consumers acting irrationally:

  • Airline elite status just isn’t worth as much as it used to be, with upgrades so hard to come by; that eliminates a huge incentive to earn status
  • We’re increasingly seeing people use cards that belong to the major non-airline points ecosystems, where you can redeem rewards efficiently toward the paid cost of a ticket, rather than just earning miles, and that offers lots more flexibility
  • Redeeming miles in general is becoming more difficult, and as airlines increasingly switch to dynamic and revenue based award pricing, the incentive to be loyal to an airline decreases

Personally, I think we’re reaching the point of market saturation when it comes to the growth possibilities for airline frequent flyer program profitability. There are so many airlines competing not just with one another, but also with other products outside the airline frequent flyer program ecosystem.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not suggesting airline frequent flyer programs will collapse, and suddenly become unprofitable. However, I don’t think we’re going to see the level of growth that some airline executives are predicting, and are counting on to continue to increase their profits.

One other thing worth mentioning is that there’s always talk among some politicians of trying to cap interchange fees, which would make the credit card industry much less profitable. If that were to ever happen, that would have a massive impact on airlines and consumers, as current credit card agreements are essentially subsidizing airfare.

I don’t think loyalty revenue will grow as fast as before

Bottom line

Nowadays, the major US airlines are earning most of their profits through non-flying means, and in particular, through their lucrative credit card agreements. While this has proven a reliable source of revenue, it presents a challenge, since it’s hard for smaller airlines to compete, as a profitable loyalty program requires scale.

So, will US airlines have to reinvent themselves? Personally, I’m not sure what their next amazing innovation could be, other than continuing to monetize their customer base in every way possible. I think the more likely scenario is that we see industry consolidation, and the same cycle continue as before.

How do you see all of this playing out?

Conversations (86)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Anthony Guest

Ben as I mentioned the other day, Elon Musk or someone like him will bring air travel to a difference. Much larger craft, 1000 or two on board, might not even need jet fuel. All seats will be good. Maybe only one class. Until then, Airline travel is like Heathrow Airport, has run its course and needs to reinvent and revamp.

0
‼ 0
AeroB13a Guest

This missive is not a windup, I will simply attempt to explain one’s own experience of the US aviation industry from an English travellers perspective. I cross the pond on a monthly basis, we visit family in the US two or three times per year. We travel within the US on various regional carriers. In general terms, as I see it, the US carriers are providing a very basic point A to point B, Uber-like service. One does not look forward to what has become a battle to travel between destinations. Often one is exhausted by the time one leaves the destination airport even after very short airtime, relieved to be free from the ordeal. The Asian and Middle Eastern airlines offer something which US carriers no longer provide. They offer a far better overall flying experience. Furthermore, they have to a great extent, put some of the glamour back into the flying experience. At the risk of pointing out the obvious and sounding male chauvinistic, the days of the PanAm eye candy, trolly Dollie’s, has long gone in the US. For better or for worse it is always going to be a contentious matter of opinion. The US airframes, cabins, etc, to the outsider, often look outdated and tired. The cabin crew, less warm and welcoming, serving very mediocre refreshments, sometimes apparently begrudgingly. The old adage “Service with a smile”, is no longer applicable. The European airlines appear to have seen the writing upon the wall and are catching up fast. There is further evidence that my experience is reasonably accurate if one cares to take into account global customer satisfaction surveys. Some poo-poo the SkyTrax World Rankings simply because it is not a US organisation, or perhaps, because they do not like to read the opinions of others. However, as there is no US airline rated in the top twenty and some are rated in the bottom third, surely this must mean something significant? There you have it, a customer opinion backed up by those of a global survey, now I await my fate at the hands of those who choose to shoot this messenger.

0
‼ 0
Barbarella Guest

I think the question stems from a sort of black-and-white understanding of the business. In reality you should separate the marketing (generating demand) and production (catering to demand) parts of the business. The production is about having the right plane at the right time with the right cost structure as requested by the marketing/sales side. Every airline faces the same challenges on production despite differences due to network and technological capabilities. On the generating demand there is the question of sales channel that differ vastly between airlines and where they opereate. The corporate channel is for example a healthy and profitable channel that exists worldwide and has stayed so, only American was stupid enough to think they could squeeze more out of it. What has gradually changed along the years in the US is the sales channel for the non corporate traffic: holidays VFR etc. There, more and more demand has been funneled through the miles and points system which has had several benefits to airlines: capture market share before any decision of flying is done, control the pricing in a manner that makes price comparison difficult, control the currency in which airfare is traded which means there is little other option to redeem the miles value than on airfare. Obviously the system has been too greedy and increasingly consumers are seeing that relying on airlines for currency is not a very healthy idea for them. I predict they will more and more move towards a currency handled by a middleman (points or hard cash) that can be more readily compared in value vs other airfare and other purchases. What airlines will lose in the process is the opportunity to generate very irrational purchase decisions (for example someone sitting on a pile of miles, seeing an expensive redemption with lots of surcharges and needing to top up miles and still going for it). Some of those redemptions will continue to happen if the consumers stick to a points system than hard cash. Still I see increased competition between airlines as demand will be less captive in the future. That increased competition will drive down margins (that are not great with the last crew cost bump) and lead to more consolidation. But all of that will happen very gradually as airlines will try to find a new equilibrium in their business model. We will also see if airlines in fortress hub manage to keep the consumer captive with miles or if they'll switch to points. The points system definitely has a few cards to play there. What counts for credit cards is people keep using them.

0
‼ 0
Alex Guest

Maybe the model will change and for example to Europe one carrier will create a hub similar to what ME carriers have done and the connections are with train or LCC. Everybody can survive 2.5 hours from Munich on an LCC to their hub and then train. The model to travel will change. The flt to the hub will be like shuttle service with possibly three classes and the first class pax will fly nonstop closest to final destination. Let’s face it, if u can pay 15 k to Europe now u can also pay 25 k. Miles are not relevant to this clientele. Similar in Aia once high speed rail moves beyond China.

0
‼ 0
Paper Boarding Pass Guest

One avenue that "won't" work is acquisition of a hotel chain and/or rental car agency. UA attempted this in the '70s with long term disappointment. And Allegiant recently stubbed its toe on its Florida resort in the middle of no where. Current hotel service has hit rock bottom post COVID. And the horror stories of Hertz would scare anyone. In fact, these two services would not add any significant margin to the airlines. Each is cutting service to the bone to break even. (The only exception to the above is the oil refinery near Philadelphia owned by DL which has provided mixed results). Consolidation doesn't seem to add much to the recipe. Economy of scale only goes so far when the labor rates of the acquisition are brought in line with that of the new owner. Even with our current administration, there would be push back considering that the big four currently control 70% of the market. Spirit needs a dance partner, so Frontier still has that engagement ring in its back pocket. And JetBlue can only survive if it finds a long term dance partner of its own (foreign or domestic like re-igniting the NEA with AA). Long term, the only answer is: - automation (ie: diminished customer support) - outsourcing (bone of contention with heavily unionized airlines) - leverage of airline alliances (via adjoining gates or terminals at airports, handoff services, etc) - keeping labor cost under control (if in doubt, see "outsourcing" above) If the airlines don't get a handle on the situation, they will end up like Eastern, Pan Am, or TWA with corporate raiders picking the bones. The same is currently happening with Southwest and Elliot. Who's next??

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published