I’ll have what the DOJ is having, please

What’s the Department of “Justice” smoking? According to this Reuter’s article, “the U.S. Justice Department opposes broad antitrust immunity for Continental Airlines Inc (CAL.N) to join UAL Corp’s (UAUA.O) United Airlines and other members of the Star alliance, documents showed.”

That doesn’t make any sense to me, but I’m sure they have a plausible explanation, especially since the airline industry lost over five billion dollars ($5,000,000,000) last year, right?

antitrust enforcers said approval is likely to harm competition on some international routes, including flights between U.S. cities and Canada and China.

Well, yeah, that’s kind of the point of partnerships, isn’t it? At the same token, I don’t see why they singled out Canada and China. I don’t see any massive capacity reductions to either of those destinations as a result of Continental entering a partnership with United and joining the Star Alliance.

The proposed agreements also could harm domestic competition and raise fares on some routes, Justice Department lawyers wrote in public comments.

So what are ya’ll proposing, that we continue to let the airlines run their course in a recession and probably top last year’s losses? Yeah, that sounds like a plan. After all, we could just bail them out if that doesn’t work.

The DOJ also said Continental, United and the other carriers have offered “little in the way” of consumer benefits arising from the alliance.

Well, yes and no. There are certainly more benefits to them than to us, but I wouldn’t call the deal completely one-sided. Consumers have a lot to gain from alliances” Just look at all the reciprocal benefits we get out of alliances, from reciprocal award availability to reciprocal lounge access to priority boarding on other airlines to more direct flights. I’d say the development of alliances is the best thing to come out out of the airline industry in the past ten years.

Conversations (9)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Oliver Guest

How about some real reporting here. Is the DOJ able to stop anything? Is the DOJ opposing CO joining Star Alliance, or something else? What's the real deal with TATL vs TPAC? Comments here and on FT indicate one was opposed (rejected?) and the other other wasn't. Which one is it? It's a nice opportunity for laywer/union/liberal bashing but ultimately I see little "reporting" or true analysis in this post and its comments. Some of you guys are frequently bashing journalists for crappy airline industry knowledge and reporting. Here's your opportunity to do some good work and really explain what the situation is and why you think the decision is wrong. Leave out all the crap about smoking pot and alleged bias of the DOJ -- it doesn't add anything to the credibility of your posts.

0
‼ 0
nun Member

Why would they allow DL and NW to become the world's largest airline? This is idiotic.

0
‼ 0
Dan Webb New Member

Sooo...consolidation is needed in the financial industry to help it survive....but we can't do that in the airline industry. I'm confused. Oh wait, the airline industry has lots of union votes. I forgot. Sorry.

0
‼ 0
Sam Guest

we all expecting things like this would happen after Obama get his hands on the DOJ. Exactly why DL/NW rushed into the merger. they may have carried out the consolidation in a bad economic situation, but it still beats having to wait 8 more year before the next Republican government, which is exactly what UA, and CO are going to have to wait for. It really goes to show how short sighted the system is forcing the CEOs to be.

0
‼ 0
andrewwm Guest

They got the TATL limited exception (Reuters article doesn't mention this) which covers 90% of what they'd want it for anyway. Right now CO + AC + UA + CA control almost all of the nonstop action to China; most of this is grandfathered in, but adding one more airline that flies an important non-stop route to PEK is just going to make the monopolistic pricing even worse. Right now if you look at flight times comparison of TPAC (China) to comparable trips in Europe, it's pretty clear that TPAC flyers are getting gouged (even moreso than prices indicate - China has minimal taxes compared to Europe). No need to make it even worse. TATL, though, it's pretty clear that the configuration of airlines in various alliances is not going to matter much, given the rock-bottom prices and cutthroat competition already in place.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published