Icelandair Seattle Flight

@rphumphries Tweeted an interesting question to me this morning:

@OneMileataTime why is there always a random Iceland Air plane parked outside the Alaska hangar at SEA?

I’ve noticed the same thing, though never put much thought into it.

Icelandair

After doing a few minutes of research I figured out the answer… kind of. The Icelandair flight to Seattle lands at 4:40PM, while the flight back to Reykjavik leaves at 3:30PM. So the plane literally sits on the ground in Seattle for 23 hours every day.

Icelandair

That seems incredibly inefficient and like horrible aircraft utilization, so I did a bit more digging to figure out why they’d leave their plane sitting in Seattle for that long.

Icelandair’s business model relies heavily on passengers looking to travel from the US to Western Europe, especially in winter, when Iceland isn’t exactly a “hot” destination. Part of the reason this works so well is because Reykjavik is an easy airport to transit (compared to London Heathrow — remember that argument?) and Iceland is more or less right on the way between the US and Western Europe, so it works for them.

But part of providing efficient connections is making sure all the flights are timed properly. For example, all flights from Reykjavik to the US depart between 4:55PM and 5:10PM, while all flights from the US to Reykjavik arrive between 6:20AM and 6:45AM. This is so that the connections are timed well between the US flights and Icelandair’s ~20 destinations in Europe. After all, one of the selling points of Icelandair’s connecting service is how short the total travel time is.

So if Icelandair pushed their flight from Reykjavik to Seattle forward by ~2.5 hours or pushed the return from Seattle to Reykjavik back by ~2.5 hours the plane could do a same day turn, though it would miss all the onward connections, which more or less eliminates the point of the service for most of the year.

Still, it’s hard to imagine they can turn a profit on a flight that requires 23 hours of ground time every day…

Conversations (22)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Phillip Diamond

Oops! I'll be quiet then! ;-) For some reason I thought it was 4x weekly! Quite a waste of aircraft utilisation then. Two aircraft a day to cover the route almost!

0
‼ 0
lucky OMAAT

@ Phillip -- The flight *is* daily. :)

0
‼ 0
Phillip Diamond

@ lucky - Agreed. What I mean is that if it is a 23 hour layover, that same set of crew will come to Seattle and leave the next day having had a rest. If the flight left after 90 minutes, they would have needed a second set of crew as the first would need to rest - regardless of whether they have to leave them behind in a hotel or have them travel as passengers back to Iceland. This wouldn't be an issue if the flight was daily, as there is no way around it.

0
‼ 0
lucky OMAAT

@ Phillip -- Regardless of whether the plane sat on the ground for 90 minutes or 23 hours they'll only need one set of crew per flight. They spend one night in Seattle either way.

0
‼ 0
Phillip Diamond

I imagine part of it might also be crew utilisation? By doing it this way, they only need one set of crew members for the return flight, as opposed to two. It would only be worth having two sets of crew if the flight is daily, I guess?!

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published