Shocking Ethiopian Airlines Safety Allegations

Ethiopian Airlines’ former chief engineer has just painted a shocking picture of the safety culture of the airline, and I’m not fully sure what to make of it.

I Have A Lot Of Respect For Ethiopian Airlines

Let me say that I’ve historically had a ton of respect for Ethiopian Airlines. Africa is a tough continent for aviation, and Ethiopian Airlines has done amazing work. They’ve built an incredible global route network, they’re profitable, they’ve been great for connecting Ethiopia to the world, and they’ve even invested in and helped other African airlines.

They’ve really done fantastic things to elevate aviation on the continent, in my opinion, and they’ve also come a long way. Just look at how airlines like South African Airways and Kenya Airways are doing, and you’ll appreciate just how far they’ve come.

Ethiopian Airlines’ Former Chief Engineer Speaks Out

The Associated Press has the story of Ethiopian Airlines’ former chief engineer, Yonas Yeshanew, who has filed a whistleblower complaint with the US Federal Aviation Administration and other international regulators. He resigned this past summer and is currently seeking asylum in the US (he currently resides in the Seattle area with his wife and two kids).

Now, before we even get into the details, I think some context is important. Ethiopian Airlines describes Yeshanew as a disgruntled former employee and denies all of his allegations. They say that he was demoted due to a “serious weaknesses in leadership, discipline and poor integrity.” As they said in a statement:

“He is a disgruntled ex-employee who fabricated a false story about Ethiopian Airlines, partly to revenge for his demotion while working in Ethiopian, and partly to probably develop a case to secure asylum in the USA. We would like to confirm once more that all his allegations are false and baseless.”

Conversely, Yeshanew says he was never demoted, and was actually promoted several times during his 12 year career at the airline.

That’s intended neither to credit nor discredit him, but rather just to share what both sides have to say about the credibility of these statements. It’s a bit puzzling that they can’t even agree on whether he was demoted or not…

I’d also note that I feel like there have been safety whistleblower complaints at just about every major airline over the years, no matter how good their record.

Allegations Against Ethiopian Airlines

This whistleblower complaint follows the carrier’s 737 MAX crash earlier this year. In his complaint, Yeshanew accuses Ethiopian Airlines of a pattern of corruption, including fabricating documents, signing off on shoddy repairs, and even beating employees who got out of line. As he said:

“The brutal fact shall be exposed … Ethiopian Airlines is pursuing the vision of expansion, growth and profitability by compromising safety.”

According to the whistleblower’s accusations:

  • An FAA audit from three years ago found that nearly all of Ethiopian’s 82 mechanics, inspectors, and supervisors, whose files were reviewed, lacked the minimum requirements for doing their jobs
  • In emails he urged top executives to end the practice of signing off on maintenance and repair jobs that were done incompletely, incorrectly, or not at all, and that was ignored (including him asking the CEO directly)
  • He said in an interview that on the day of the 737 MAX crash, Ethiopian’s COO worried the airline would be blamed for the crash because of their maintenance issues and violations, and ordered that records of the downed plane be checked for mistakes; Yeshanew recalls the COO saying “we pray to God that this will not point to our fault”
  • The day of the crash someone logged into the computerized record-keeping system for the downed plane, noting that a “roll to the right” was also reported by pilots three months earlier

Perhaps the most shocking allegation is that Ethiopian Airlines has a jail-like detention center at Addis Ababa Airport. This is allegedly used to interrogate and intimidate employees.

Yeshanew knew of at least two employees in the past three years who were beaten up there. He was also taken there for 10 hours and questioned, because they suspected he was talking to news organizations:

“If you are in jail, it means you’ll be beaten, you will be tortured. There is no difference in the current political system of Ethiopia.”

Bottom Line

I’m not sure what to make of all of this. It goes without saying that these allegations are absolutely awful, and a serious investigation needs to be done. That being said, I don’t think it’s necessarily fair to take all of the allegations as fact, given that we’re talking about one former employee who is also seeking asylum (the report notes that similar complaints have been filed in the past, and some other employees have confirmed some aspects of his claims).

Ethiopian Airlines has done great things for aviation in the region, and they’ve grown in a way that’s both sustainable and impressive, and they deserve credit for that. They’re no doubt the best in their set of competitors. But if this is true regarding safety, then some serious things need to change.

What do you make of these accusations against Ethiopian Airlines?

Conversations (57)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

BillC Gold

@Tefere Gebre -- "This makes it clear that you either work for Boeing PR or just willing to defend Boeing at any cost…." -- Uh ... *Not*! I'm merely evaluating Boeing's Engineering and Management options on how to respond to Airbus's NEO versions in an expeditious manner! Anyone with credible Engineering or Management backgrounds can relate to these same issues! Did you notice that I *did* fault Boeing for its *flawed* implementation of MCAS? However, keep in mind that Implementation and Concept are *Not* the same thing! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- "... Boeing basically decided to load up a huge engine on a 60 year of 737 and call it new… Its not or never was a software issue… the MAX should never have been allowed to fly." Did you read my thread above on the Engineering and Management aspects of Boeing's choices? Do you realize just how many aircraft today *must* rely on software in order to even "fly" (ie, stay in the air)? *All* Airbus aircraft use software as well -- are you aware of the A320/A320NEO Center-of-Gravity issue that, after decades of service, has just recently become center stage with some EU airlines, due to cabin seating configurations? And *how* is Airbus going to "fix" this "flaw" in their decades-old design? Through *Software*! There is absolutely *Nothing* wrong with incorporating software within the control loop of aircraft today -- commercial or military! Like I said in my post above -- an inadequate or flawed *Implementation* does *not* therefore invalidate the underlying "Concept*! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- "BTW: you keep say 'one accident' … how about Lyon Air?" -- Uh ... I can't seem to locate your "one accident" reference in this thread? Help me locate that? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- "Boeing needs to scrap this thing… come up with a new aircraft that worthy of the skies." -- You should review what I posted above about Boeing's choices from both Engineering and Management perspectives! Keep in mind that it takes at least 6+ years to get a new design developed and certified! Is the global airliner market is going to just sit by and wait at least 6+ years for Boeing to develop and certify something brand new? That would be called their New Midsize Airplane (NMA or some guess 797) program, that has *not* been approved for launch, due to the current MAX issues!

0
‼ 0
Tefere Gebre Guest

@BillC "So it is NOT necessary, and is NOT feasible, to scrap the MAX and develop a brand new aircraft to replace the MAX! Boeing just needs to make MCAS more robust and consistent in its intended behavior under ALL flight situations before re-certification happens!" This makes it clear that you either work for Boeing PR or just willing to defend Boeing at any cost.... for the reasons stated by yourself (Boeing not having a real answer to Airbus) and being pressured by American Airlines, Boeing basically decided to load up a huge engine on a 60 year of 737 and call it new... Its not or never was a software issue... the MAX should never have been allowed to fly. BTW: you keep say "one accident "... how about Lyon Air? Boeing needs to scrap this thing... come up with a new aircraft that worthy of the skies.

0
‼ 0
TDeb Guest

if the guy is telling us the Truth. He supposed to leave his job a head of time. my question is why now? Even if the claim is true , he is part of the problem . because he was there , keep silent for years and enjoy his work at the expense of peoples live. In can smell something .............from Boeing side, but the investigation has to be commence.

0
‼ 0
Ten Guest

If the FAA had deemed the technical staff unfit to perform their tasks or meet their minimum requirements, Ethiopian's services to the USA would have been impacted, subjected to audits and/or discontinuation. Ethiopian flies multiple flights per day to the USA, passenger (Washington, Chicago, Newark, JFK) and cargo, and is about to also start flying to Houston. Words like “we pray to God that this will not point to our fault” can be interpreted in a number of ways from Amharic to other languages. But if they were truly said, any company representative that is involved in such accident would think it and say it out loud. If someone slipped and fell outside your home in icy conditions, you would still say something along those lines so you are not blamed/sued for it.

0
‼ 0
Grey Guest

By claiming that FAA determined their maintenance was insufficient, it makes me doubt most of the claim being made. Ethiopian is permitted to fly to America. Ethiopian is permitted to fly to the EU. So clearly the aviation regulators in these jurisdiction have determined that they are a safe airline meeting all of the criteria to fly there. If they failed an FAA inspection, surely they would have been barred from flying to USA.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published