Why Delta Pilots Oppose Delta’s New Partnership

Foreign airlines pose a risk to aviation jobs in the US! Sound familiar? Nope, for once it’s not Delta making these accusations against the Gulf carriers, but rather it’s Delta’s pilots union making these accusations against Delta management.

Delta’s new transatlantic joint venture

A couple of weeks ago I wrote about how the US Department of Transportation tentatively approved a new comprehensive joint venture between Delta, Air France, KLM, and Virgin Atlantic.

Currently Delta has a joint venture with Virgin Atlantic, and Delta has a separate joint venture with Air France-KLM. However, with this new joint venture there would be a single partnership between all the airlines, allowing them to coordinate schedules and pricing across the Atlantic.

When the DOT makes a decision like this, there’s always a period for public comment, before final approval is granted. It’s normal to see objections, especially from competitors.

However, this time around we’re seeing objections from a party you don’t often hear complaints from — Delta’s pilots.

Why Delta’s pilots oppose the new joint venture

The Delta Master Executive Council of the Air Line Pilots Association (which represents Delta pilots), has made their concerns regarding this new joint venture clear.

They believe that additional conditions are necessary to ensure that Delta operated services and US aviation workers realize the promised benefits of the amended joint venture.

Specifically, Delta’s pilots are urging the Department of Transportation to:

  • Expand the scope of their proposed five year review of the joint venture to assess the impact it has on US aviation jobs, and the balance of flying and growth opportunities generated in joint venture markets; in other words, they want to see after five years how many flights Delta has added, compared to how many flights partner airlines have added
  • Impose an interim review of the joint venture on December 31, 2019, to ensure that progress is being made with these metrics

The reason they’re concerned is because what they saw following the approval of previous joint ventures:

In 2013, the Delta MEC expressed strong support for the Delta-Virgin joint venture on the basis that it would “produce new flying opportunities for Delta and its employees”—and thereby grow and enhance US job and career opportunities—through expanded service offerings between the US and the United Kingdom.

Nearly six years later, the promised growth in US-UK services has accrued almost exclusively to Virgin, and the promised US job and career opportunities predicated on Delta operational expansion in that market have failed to materialize. In fact, Delta-operated flying in the critical New York-London market has actually decreased since the Delta-Virgin joint went into effect.

This use of the JV mechanism to effectively outsource Delta flying to a foreign carrier whose flight crews work under substantially less favorable wages and work rules is fundamentally inconsistent with the Department’s public interest objectives of strengthening the competitive position of US air carriers relative to foreign air carriers, and encouraging fair wages and working conditions.

They note that this joint venture, if approved, would significantly reduce Delta’s financial incentive to expand their own operations in the markets, allowing significant transatlantic growth on other airlines instead.

Bottom line

While Delta has the all around best labor relations of the “big three” US airlines, in this case the pilots definitely aren’t wrong.

When it comes to battling the Gulf carriers, Delta always talks about how critically important it is to protect US aviation jobs. However, many of their joint ventures haven’t led to the amount of expanded flying you’d expect, as Delta has instead left much of the expansion to partner airlines.

Now, in this case I think the pilots may be raising their concern a bit too late. Delta already has joint ventures with the individual airlines involved, so I’m not sure we’ll see all that much expansion because of this joint venture. Rather I think we’ll see more schedule coordinating.

What do you make of the objections of Delta pilots?

Conversations (36)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Spiffy Guest

Bob, you’re an idiot.

0
‼ 0
AvCommenter Guest

Delta management appears to be making a rational commercial decision (at least if they can get away with it): Virgin is the cheaper provider of air service between London and the US, and Delta’s 49% ownership of Virgin allows it (Delta, the company, and Delta management) to benefit from the efficiencies of using Virgin metal (and its two-pilot staffing of many flights) rather than the more expensive Delta metal (with three pilots on all flight under, one assumes, the Delta-ALPA DL MEC collective bargaining agreement). The DL MEC can protect itself against such “outsourcing” in negotiations with Delta. If there are indeed violations of the existing labor agreement, there is recourse to binding arbitration. The last thing the US Department of Transportation should do is insert itself into this labor-management dispute. The Delta pilots have more than enough negotiating strength to address the issue if it is really that important to them. Their call for DOT intervention is an attempt to have the Government plump its thumb in the scales in their favor. This is not to say that DOT’s tentative approval of this mega-JV was the right decision: I am strongly inclined to agree with the criticisms voiced by JetBkue in the proceeding—but that is a different discussion. All that said, the behavior of Delta management demonstrates in spades just how hypocritical Anderson and now Bastian have been in their fevered tirades against the Gulf carriers, not to mention the tens of millions of shareholder dollars they have wasted on this anti-consumer campaign. Shame!

0
‼ 0
Bob Guest

Delta pilots suck They are a bunch of Navy Brats that just land on taxiways

0
‼ 0
Cristian Guest

Gate people in west EU make around 25 Euro per hour , that's one thing; second, I believe is just outsourcing and cutting costs with any costs for D. The more pilots they have the bigger the problem.

0
‼ 0
Rebecca Guest

Delta's 'sharing' of ATL-LHR routes to Virgin stinks for frequent fliers ... so much so that I make sure I am on Delta metal. Maybe it would be better with the new arrangement, but if not, I am with the pilots. And I am probably with them on principle anyway.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published