More Details On Sin...
 

More Details On Singapore Airlines' 787-10, Debuting In April 2018

24 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
399 Views
Posts: 40504
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#7273]
wpf-cross-image

The 787 and A350 are two of the most popular new long range planes, and over the coming months we’ll see both Airbus and Boeing roll out stretch variants of these planes — Qatar Airways will be the launch customer for the A350-1000, while Singapore Airlines will be the launch customer of the 787-10.

Continue reading: More Details On Singapore Airlines’ 787-10, Debuting In April 2018

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


23 Replies
23 Replies
(@Debit)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 171

Nice accessory with long legs


Reply
 Ben
(@Ben)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 335

While its great that J will be fully-flat, that is a very tight looking fully-flat seat.


Reply
(@Emily)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 39

Can't wait to fly on these instead of their aging 380s 🙂


Reply
(@Aaron Chan)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 5

Hi, your SIN-KIX flight numbers should read SQ618/SQ619.


Reply
 ron
(@ron)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 449

Now let's see. I used to be an extremely loyal SQ flyer and have probably been 15+ years PPS Solitaire.
However since they introduced these 'diagonal sleepers' I have moved to GA, KL, TG, QR, EK for the very simple reason that the seats are unpractical to sit in and uncomfortable to sleep.
That, combined with super prices ex SQ, CGK and DPS makes them for my taste rather uncompetitive. My only flights with SQ last few years have been of the 'miles-burning' type and that job is now largely done as I have moved to other airlines.


Reply
Diamond
(@adamr)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Having flown both the old and updated J, F, and old Suites products, I'm actually kind of looking forward to this Stelia Opal configuration because I just can't sleep at that offset. I know I'm still fully flat but there's something about lying diagonally in the "box" formed by the seat that plays with my head - like lying diagonally in bed. Who does that?! I've never had a good night's sleep in SQ J. While the new seats will be tighter in most aspects, I enjoy cocoon-like spaces for sleeping and I prefer to lie parallel to my "bed". For me, this is a marked improvement. But I'm also a wee little fella at only 5'8".


Reply
(@Henning)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 7

What a coincidence - I‘m actually already booked on SQ118 in mid April, and after reading this, I instantly checked out the booking. And see, they are not displaying any aircraft type for this flight any more (their website is probably not yet capable of that), and the seatmap shows rows 11 to 20, like pictured above.

Sounds like the entire trip will be fun, as on the inbound KUL-SIN I‘m scheduled to fly on the A350 (first time for me) and now the return flight will also be something „new“, particularly when compared to the A333 that was scheduled for this flight at the time of booking.


Reply
 CRB
(@crb)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

the new regional biz class seat looks like it will be more comfortable for sleeping than the long haul seat that's a reverse herringbone masquerading as forward facing. No more sleeping diagonally!


Reply
 Nay
(@nay)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

ugh i was hoping that SQ would follow JAL and do a 2-4-2 in economy.


Reply
(@1353513636)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@avery111
Same. Although if they keep these on short haul and fly the A350s on long haul it won't be so bad. The C product on this plane isn't amazing either in contrast with most airlines who inaugurate 787s with cutting edge C products and terrible Y products (meaning this plane likely won't be on flagship routes).


Reply
(@adelaidearchitect)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

3x3x3 in Economy is disappointing despite it becoming the “norm”. It gives 3 pax per row the grief of the dreaded “middle” seat - while 2x4x2 has only two. Also less “reaching” for the FA’s when serving meals and drinks. When travelling with my wife we’ll actively seek the 2x4x2 configuration as with the “north/south” space becoming tighter - we can at least create our own little world with the “east/west” space. We’ve started upgrading to PE simply to find those “2’s”...


Reply
 Mak
(@Mak)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 232

I wouldn't assume that all of these aircraft will be used for mainline SQ operations.


Reply
 Hiro
(@hiro)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 327

At the moment their 787 business seat is bookable with partner miles (i.e. LifeMiles).


Reply
 Matt
(@Matt)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 1

Question to SIA. what’s the difference between scoots 787, 3x3x3 and SIA 787 3x3x3.. other than $$$
You have given up on your biggest selling point “service” the high density rows of 9 are ok for LCC carriers.
I expected more from SIA and will not be spending the amount you think people are stupid enough to pay for a sub standard cattle car.
CX have a load of new A350XWB... an aircraft designed for humans in economy.
Previously flown 787’s with NZ, BA, EY & Scoot.
All have been terrible. except scoot, got what I paid for!
The seats are too narrow and the aisles are just unsafe. SIA shame on you!


Reply
(@Jacks)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 2

Which following destinations after Osaka do you think ?

Example: on website SIA, if you ask for a reservation SIN – NRT in middle of July, SQ638 to go and SQ637 back = 777-300ER go and back ...but no First class and no Eco-Premium... and that doesn't exists on any configurations of the SIA 777...

Thus: do you think that Tokyo-Narita will be the following destination of the 787-10???


Reply
 Ian
(@Ian)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 2

Is there any indication how the business class seats A & K in the SQ 787-10 will alternate? In other words, which A & K seats will be right by the window and which will be on the aisle?


Reply
 Hiro
(@hiro)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 327

@Ian - I suspect the wheel-chair-friendly seats will be closer to the aisle and the rest towards the window.


Reply
 Hiro
(@hiro)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 327

@Jacks - don't think Tokyo routes will be operated by 787s since they are already operated by 77W and 350 - which means it'll be a downgrade if they decide to use them. The 787s at the moment are substitution to aircraft with angled flat 2-2-2 configured J cabin.


Reply
 Ian
(@Ian)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 2

Thank you Hiro! I realised that not long after posting my question, when I was taking a closer look at the seating plan. Indeed, that must be the case. Many thanks again!


Reply
(@Speedbird)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 378

@Emily Your joking right? You realize their oldest A380 isn't even ten years old, and their newest are rolling off the line as we speak? Furthermore, the 78Js are going on short/medium haul Asian routes, whilst the A380s are used for their trunk long haul routes


Reply
 Hiro
(@hiro)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 327
(@Jacks)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 2

I was right 🙂 in July SQ636 and SQ637 to Tokyo with 787-10...

YESSSSS 😀 it mean I will test the new C seat.
Just need to change for the best seat ... and wait to flight


Reply
(@NickSJ)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 7

Does anyone know whether SIA's new 787-10s will have crew rest areas above the cabin? If not, what is their range limitation with a single crew?


Reply