Here's Why Avatar A...
 

Here's Why Avatar Airlines Won't Fly A380s

33 Posts
16 Users
0 Reactions
192 Views
Posts: 39789
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#11554]
wpf-cross-image

Avatar Airlines is America's most promising airline startup (and has been for the past 28 years). A few days ago I wrote about the company's generous offer to British Airways. Well, Avatar Airlines has reached out to me to both thank me for my "excellent optimistic report" about the company's future, and also to shed…

Continue reading: Here’s Why Avatar Airlines Won’t Fly A380s

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


32 Replies
32 Replies
(@switzerland)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Insert the "you, the joke, flying over your head" GIF in your response to them. Please


Reply
 bruh
(@bruh)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

My question is 'Why a 747'? You sure you can fill at least 50% of the seats on flights to Rockford, or Sanford, or Albany, or Trenton?


Reply
(@Ulisesrguez)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 30

This is just hilarious, this makes Global Ghana Airlines look like a 5 star airline in comparison!


Reply
(@Andrew)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 44

Why not a Concorde?

After all you are talking about a fictional airline, they can fly whatever they like...


Reply
(@corpkid)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I fly Allegiant frequently as they are the only direct connection between my two homes (Sanford/Orlando and Asheville). Doesn't hurt the flight usually costs me <$50, either. The only problem I could potentially see here is how *LONG* it would take to load and unload the 747's. A lot of the people who fly these discount carriers are not frequent fliers and thus the whole process moves quite slowly.


Reply
(@Potato)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 135

"Avatar plans on being an all-Boeing 747 airline, and it has offered British Airways’ parent company a 22% stake (which it values at $165 million) in exchange for the 26 Boeing 747-400s that the airline is retiring."

Give us your planes for free in turn you get to bet on our success. Doubt that IAG has much interest in becoming a shareholder in that venture (particularly given that they could hand over the 747 fleet to Level and let them fly 'em) and be subordinated to virtually everyone if Avatar inevitably goes belly-up.


Reply
Diamond
(@mojoe)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 308

Fascinating. Avatar's model would turn the narrow-body, high-frequency model on its head. If (British Airways was willing to play along and) Avatar could get BA's unwanted 747's added to its fleet, then that would mean no cash expense/payments for aircraft acquisition and low expenses (on a per-passenger basis) for pilots.

Not sure Avatar's idea will come to fruition, but it would be neat to see 747's flying around for another decade or more in the U.S.


Reply
(@Willie Walsh)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 1

I think after 28 years of trying to get off the ground, the name Avatar is appropriate. That is all the airline will ever be. Besides, the FAA won't even take them seriously. I think BA is having a good chuckle over their proposal.


Reply
 Matt
Gold
(@matt-4)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Now that we have a detailed explanation, the business model makes total sense.


Reply
(@norman)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

In all seriousness if they can sell tickets for 19.99 I don't see why this model wouldn't work. Whether or not 10k of rev covers all costs is another story. Lol


Reply
(@bill-n-dc)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 408

I like the Iowa airports shout out 😉


Reply
(@corpkid)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Are they going to deck these out with max economy seating (ala Allegiant/Spirit)? If so isn't that like 500+ seats? (:


Reply
(@Alex James)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 29

Ben - this isn't the first time that a comedy US airline start-up has flown to Trenton and Islip - do you remember BALTIA? BALTIMORE, TRENTON, ISLIP AND ALBANY...


Reply
(@FabinhoBP)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 61

We are all so bored, that we have actually wasted our times commenting on such a ridiculous story.
While we are still wondering if the Pros (AA,DL,UA,WN,B6) are going to survive these times, can anyone really believe in such a ridiculous business venture ??? LOL


Reply
Gold
(@gringoloco)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

PGD doesn't have the runway length for loaded 744s. Damn it -- back to the drawing board for another 5 years.


Reply
 Kaj
(@kaj)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Wait - didn't Baltia already scarf up all the retiring 747s?


Reply
(@Richard)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 6

Perhaps they should revisit the idea of the A380, and approach Emirates, who currently have lots of spare airframes and also might seek feeder-routes into their US-gateways ?

I mean, if it works for B744s, just imagine how much lower the fares might be, on all-economy A388s !


Reply
 JBR
(@JBR)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 68

If this is a serious proposal, I can't see Dougie and AA being too happy about having their role of feeding BA planes taken away.


Reply
Gold
(@ben-holz)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

r/whoosh


Reply
Gold
(@dander)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

this would be funny if it ever happens and if it is profitable


Reply
(@UpperDeckJohnny)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 135

Avatar CEO ex 747 Captain?
US Company?
US Domestic flights only?

Try these reasons for not flying the unquestionably more economical, and it is well documented more comfortable 380

Avatar just remains loyal to bouncy Boeings.

This is only one side of this best joke of the year/decade/century. And one flight a day that pax will wait for? Bigger joke.


Reply
 Ash
(@Ash)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 1

A better business plan would be a modified 747 which piggybacks a modified space shuttle, with high density seating in the cargo bay.

Mid flight, from say Miami to LA, the space shuttle could detach for those wanting to get off in Dallas.

On the next LA to Dallas flight, the shuttle could be reattached to the 747.

Avatar should be bold, don't do this by halves.


Reply
 KC
(@KC)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 65

I’m avoiding making a joke about this. It would be nice to have BA’s 744s back in the skies and not broken up at Kemble and I could see this happening. I can see Señor Cruz thinking this is a good idea, so maybe. If this did happen, it would be interesting to see if BA or other IAG airlines would be interested in feeding whichever regional US airports (probably not those in IA) they’d serve. BA already do CHS and can take dreamlifters so... Actually CLT has relatively cheap landing fees and it’s a hub. Just not sure they’d be able to park a 747 at the new terminal A (the only non international terminal that AA don’t have a monopoly over).


Reply
(@lukas-2)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Ben, this was among your top 10 posts of all time 🙂 Made my day.


Reply
(@jan-s)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I still don't know if all this is a joke or not.


Reply
 KC
(@KC)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 65

Let me backtrack on my Señor Cruz comment earlier. Maybe Pogue Mahoney will do it.


Reply
 Ww
(@Ww)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 91

Such a joke of an article...and not April Fools! I thought even the name is suspect; 'Avatar', meaning 'an imaginary online image' (or an Hindu deity). What an awful name for a 'serious' airline start-up.


Reply
(@quinn)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Why did they photoshop winglets onto a 747-8i when they have raked wingtips? Or did they photoshop the engine nacelles from a 747-8i onto a 747-400?


Reply
(@John Luffred)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 29

OMG.
"AVATAR"
SERIOUSLY BEN?
YOUR NEW "DELTA"
Starting an airline now is just crazy!
Widebodies domestically?
Fuel hogs!
Especially the 747.


Reply
(@UpperDeckJohnny)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 135

One light at the end of this ludicrous saga is

Ex CEO of IAG Willy Walsh, ex Ryanair, I believe
CEO of BA Alex Cruz ex Vuelling

Both [extra] low cost carriers

Maybe they'll finally agree a takeover from Avatar and alchieve their objective of turning BA into a low cost carrier. They're not far off already.


Reply
(@Barry)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 2

It’s ok, IBM laughed at Bill Gates, now compare IBM to Microsoft and you decide who had the last laugh.


Reply
(@Dave C)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 1

747 into Trenton-Mercer? Maybe a landing with serious overrun into the woods. No need to worry about a takeoff. But who worries about such detail.


Reply