British Airways CEO...
 

British Airways CEO Alex Cruz Steps Down

30 Posts
9 Users
0 Reactions
345 Views
Posts: 40344
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#11555]
wpf-cross-image

There are some major leadership changes coming at International Airline Group (IAG), which is the parent company of British Airways, Iberia, Aer Lingus, and Vueling.

Continue reading: Wow: British Airways CEO Alex Cruz Steps Down

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


29 Replies
29 Replies
(@TravelinWilly)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 1

Bye bye POS!


Reply
(@Banana airline employee)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 1

Guess we found out who’s replacing TC


Reply
 KC
(@KC)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 65

The only sad thing about this is the future of the alexcruzmaybe Twitter account.


Reply
(@Grounded)
Joined: 15 years ago

Posts: 54

Historically, data shows that company insiders have been more successful than outsiders. Secondly, it is less common in Europe to hire outsiders compared to the US. Lastly, all these moves were likely part of the negotiations that happened when these airlines were merged into IAG.


Reply
Diamond
(@the-nice-paul)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

The writing was on the wall a few months back, when Walsh publicly slapped down Cruz.

Despite the US’s longstanding attachment to the “great men” theory, in fact most CEOs make only relatively small differences to their organisations. Which is why their vast pay packets and incentivisation schemes are unwarranted. The coincidence of circumstances is usually much more important.

Napoleon knew that: it’s why he said the one quality he wanted in all his generals was that they should be lucky.


Reply
(@Clare Evers)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 1

I personally think there will be a lot more of these articles over the coming months. Everything travelwise seems to be on the verge of collapse.


Reply
(@vlcnc)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 559

Alex Cruz has been the worst leader of BA ever - he deserves no respect, I'm surprised you actually say that Ben. Another talentless charlatan cutting a grift way above their competency and skills. He's presided over the destruction of the airline, handled every problem terribly and made industrial relations worse. The positive improvements to BA's dated premium product you mention would have happened anyway, aren't revolutionary because he's a moron with zero creativity or innovation - he's introduced an existing available everywhere and basically stolen other airlines idea of getting Do&Co to do catering it's hardly really a complex or innovative solution to the issues of BA's outdated product. Good riddance.


Reply
(@vlcnc)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 559

Also I have to add - his background is hardly stellar. He was at American during one of its worst periods, and Vueling is hands down the worst airline in Europe in terms of customer service and customer care. His history and whole career is pretty much all an appalling record.


Reply
 Bill
(@Bill)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 21

That’s right. Step down when there’s a real challenge. That’s why CEOs make so much $$$... to step down when things get tough, not to try to save the company. Must be nice.


Reply
 Jay
(@Jay)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 21

worst business class product in the world.


Reply
(@Justin)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 372

Didn’t realize the comment section here was basically a Marxist haven. Yikes.


Reply
 Opus
(@Opus)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 39

@vlcnc care to share your history and career?


Reply
(@Billy Bob Thorny)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 1

Hope that BA ditches there gag order in which they threaten Executive Club members for speaking out publicly.


Reply
 KW
(@KW)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 60

Good. He was a terrible leader that destroyed a once great airline. Only second in incompetence and brand destruction to Alan at Qantas.


Reply
(@ChrisC)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 457

Ben I want to challenge you on this comment you made

"...since the precedent was that the British Airways CEO becomes the IAG CEO"

What precedent? There have been only two IAG CEOs - Willie Walsh and now Luis Gallego.

If there had been half a dozen CEs of IAG all coming from the BA side then yes you could say the BA CE would always get the top job but that's clearly not the case.

If anything the precedent now would seem to be that there would be a CE from BA to be replaced by the CE of IB and then back to BA and so on. But again since we are now only onto our second IAG CE that's not exactly precedent either!

Uness there is something written into the IAG constitution that says BA supplies the CE and IB the chair they can appoint anyone they like to the jobs.

I wonder how well the PANJNY would be run if they appointed the Chair and CE based on merit and not because NY appoints one role and NJ the other.


Reply
(@stephen-morrissey-2-2-2-2-2-2-2)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Would be nice if BA would incorporate some Aer Lingus quality service and product.

But I won't count on it.


Reply
(@phogan)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 1

While it has been evident BA has embellished lovely service in Business and First, it has been extremely sad to see the downgrade in coach. This should be highly re-evaluated. Only a few years ago before Cruz, BA offered always such nice service for the regular cabin traveler, many of whom saved up to pay for a special trip (and not a business). BA’s attention to little details made the long international flight a wonderful experience far beyond other companies (ie hot towels before arrival), and why I would choose when possible over the decades of travel.


Reply
Gold
(@rich_az)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 346

Unfortunately (getting old sucks) I'm in my 50s with 30+ years of work experience at different companies and managers/leaders usually fall into 3 categories (sorry for the boring names):

1. Functional - Get the job done but nothing really great or bad.

2. Bad - Egomaniacs, power trippers, do it my way or the highway, etc. One of these can destroy a strong office/company in a short period of time. People tend to stay loyal, often more than they should, and enjoy their coworkers in a good office but once a bad manager gets there and a few key people leave the office, others look around and say "why should I stay?" and anyone with talent leaves and it becomes a domino effect.

3. Excellent - I was lucky enough to see a few of these. They treat people with respect, realize you can't squeeze blood out of a rock, hold people accountable while giving them freedom and tools to get the job done. As an office gets more talent, no one wants to be the weak chain and everyone tries harder and enjoys their coworkers (mostly).

Even with an excellent manager it can take a long time to build up and recruit top workers to the office unlike how quickly a bad manager can destroy an office/company.

I started my career with an excellent manager and it has spoiled me for much of the rest of my career since it is hard to find those in the real world. We had a team of people who got a ton job, many went far in their careers, and we worked and played hard. A great way to grow up (from college graduate to mid 30s).


Reply
 KC
(@KC)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 65

It’s fair to say Doyle doesn’t deserve recognition for the improvements at Aer Lingus. That said, Cruz doesn’t deserve recognition for the improved club suite either - that was before his time too, as were the A350 orders. To be fair to Cruz, the negatives were already there before, and he was hardly able to do anything positive because Walsh was calling the shots. Do I think with Walsh now gone he’d have done anything good even without covid? No. But it’s probably unfair to blame him for all the failures at BA since he’s been there. He’ll be remembered for the economy food debacle and the hi-vis jacket. That’s about it. As you say, Doyle has been around BA for longer than Cruz had - now it’s up to Doyle to see what he can do now Walsh isn’t around to foul things up.


Reply
(@Rebecca)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 20

Be careful for what you may have wished for or please to see happen.

BA is up the creek without a paddle in a storm. This is not a case of just bringing back full service and world beating products. They come at a price, a very large one, and how many of these people are currently spending or will be anytime soon.

I wonder how long Doyle will truly last?


Reply
Diamond
(@mojoe)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 308

I'll tip my hat to the new constitution
Take a bow for the new revolution
Smile and grin at the change all around
Pick up my guitar and play
Just like yesterday
Then I'll get on my knees and pray
We don't get fooled again
Don't get fooled again
No, no!

Meet the new boss
Same as the old boss


Reply
Diamond
(@glenn-t)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 1212

Genteel "stepping down" or getting fired/shown the door?
One doesn't do "stepping down" unless there is some "stepping up" plan somewhere else. That does not appear to be the case here, so I guess he's putting up the 'Airline Exec For Hire' shingle given he's not near retirement age.
Should Doug Parker be nervous?


Reply
(@UpperDeckJohnny)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 136

@vicnc
Absolutely spot on. He should join the other faker, Mueller just as useless on the scrap heap.

If Willy Walsh was calling the shots on Cruz, that makes Cruz a useless yesman of a CEO. If Willy was not, then Cruz did it on his own, so he's equally useless.

Good riddance does even come close to how I feel about this moron.


Reply
(@airqjusa)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Strategically I wonder if Qatar Airways is happy with these changes. Is the relationship with Mr Gallego as strong as it was between Mr Walsh and Mr Al Bakkar. Could we see QR bid for the 70+% of shares it does not own, given the rumours that IAG may want to sell off BA as a standalone airline particularly now that the UK is out of the EU and about to do a deal or no deal on trade with Europe. All we do know is that change is coming faster than ever now with the pandemic and airlines need financially strong owners. I suspect over this Winter we are going to see some very interesting moves.


Reply
(@vlcnc)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 559

@William Q Jones: Technically QR can't buy a majority stake in BA still as all EU law becomes British Law when we leave the EU at the end of the year. This piece of legislation would have to be individually repealed and new legislation proposed before that could happen.


Reply
Diamond
(@kerry)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 405

@William Q Jones can you cite any source for the “rumours that IAG May want to sell off BA as a stand-alone airline”? BA has generally been by far the most profitable arm of the group, so I cannot see a situation in which they would flog it off.

QR would never get permission from the UK to hold a majority and foreign majority ownership of airlines is barred in the EU as well.

Overall this is a positive move - Sean Doyle was a BA exec from the days when they were a world-leading airline, not from a low-cost carrier background. Hopefully he brings a different management philosophy with him and helps to restore some pride (and better labour relations) among BA staff.


Reply
(@airqjusa)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Rumours are just that - they swirl. You can never say never. The airline world has changed for good. Direction post COVID is totally different to pre COVID. Cash burn of BA is enormous and will continue for the foreseeable future in business terms and IAG does not have unlimited access to cash. The UK state was not prepared to help VA and would not have the capacity to help BA given the skyrocketing UK debt. There is speculation over multiple European airline bankruptcies airing at the moment. Qatar is a very good friend of the UK and the QR CEO is nothing if not very ambitious. I would not bet on anything remaining constant at the moment. Whatever you think about the management changes, the new people have a huge rock to push uphill against a resurgent virus.


Reply
Diamond
(@the-nice-paul)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@Kerry
“QR would never get permission from the UK to hold a majority”

That’s a bold assertion. The UK has consistently demonstrated its willingness to flog off pretty much anything commercial to foreign owners (and don’t forget Qatar is already the owner of vast chunks of UK infrastructure and has huge property holdings in London (the frequency of QR flights between Doha and London is not at all a coincidence, and nor is it coincidence that QR’s flight number 1 flies to London)).

I’d be amazed if (post-EU) the current UK government tried to block an attempt by IAG to sell BA to the Qataris. They might even encourage it, seeing it as preferable to it being owned by Spain (with whom the UK’s relationships are already rapidly freezing. British possession of Gibraltar is a running sore to Madrid, and the long-running dispute has only been suppressed because of both countries’ EU membership. With that ending for the UK, expect the EU to pivot behind Spain’s claims to the territory).


Reply
(@Rebecca)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 20

@The nice Paul, If BA were to be sold to QR it will be Al-Baker calling the shots all the way. Great for customers as we will get top notch products. However all staff for back office functions will all be gone abroad if not already done so and cabin and to a certain degree flight crew will all get new contracts on lower rates.

Otherwise if QR upped the shareholding Al-Baker will be on the IAG board for sure!


Reply