British Airways announces 787 service to Austin, Texas

British Airways announces 787 service to Austin, Texas

22

British Airways announced today that they’ll be launching service between London Heathrow and Austin, starting March 3, 2014. The new service will be flown by a 787 and initially operate five times a week (every day except Wednesdays and Saturdays), and by the end of 2014 be daily.

The new service will operate the following schedule:

BA191 London to Austin departing 12:35PM arriving 5:00PM
BA190 Austin to London departing 7:00PM arriving 10:00AM (+1 day)

Kudos to British Airways for the innovation here. Routes like these — that no one saw coming — are what make the 787 awesome. While you have airlines like Qatar Airways flying the 787 between London and Doha, I don’t find that to be especially exciting since it’s a route they operated with great frequency before the 787. I love the new routes the plane has opened up, though, like Boston to Tokyo, Helsinki to Tokyo, Denver to Tokyo, etc.

British Airways 787
Photo courtesy British Airways

Conversations (22)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Alex Guest

    Given the variance in what fuel surcharge should be by aircraft type, the whole concept seems ripe for a class action lawsuit...

  2. lucky OMAAT

    @ Ivan Y -- Yep, in theory any added capacity should improve award space from that part of the country. At least in theory.

  3. lucky OMAAT

    @ Alex -- As Stephan notes the whole thing is a scam. I think there shouldn't be any at all and that the cost of fuel should be factored into the cost of a ticket. But you raise a great point given how fuel efficient the 787 is. Maybe it should have a battery surcharge instead. ;)

  4. Stephan Guest

    @Alex - BA fuel surcharges have nothing to do with fuel costs. Its a scam charge, user tax, administrative fee, whatever you want it to be and has no basis in any actual passenger costs to BA. It's a pure money grab, plain and simple.

  5. Ivan Y Diamond

    I'm based in Houston and this is probably a good news for people flying out of IAH and DFW More flights out of Texas should mean better award availability for all, right?

    A bit disappointed no first class on this flight but business seats must be in higher demand (at least, based on lack of J award space on IAH-LHR).

  6. Alex Guest

    Ben, do you think fuel surcharges should vary by aircraft type, and not route? After all, the 787 uses less fuel than an a380...so shouldn't the YQ be less?

  7. lucky OMAAT

    @ Josh G -- Indeed I haven't. Working on changing that with a US 90K award that incorporates LOT, ANA, and Ethiopian "Dreamliners." :D

  8. Josh G Guest

    Lucky, is it true you STILL haven't flown on the Dreamliner? I know you planned to fly on LOT but plans changed when they got grounded in January.

  9. Jason C Guest

    I hope so! Premium economy is listed at $5.5k! :D

  10. lucky OMAAT

    @ Jason C -- In fairness they just announced the route today, so I wouldn't consider their introductory rates to be sustainable long term.

  11. Jason C Guest

    Looks like fares are at a 60% premium over connecting flights. Happy as an Austinite, but for now UA's 787 from IAH is a better option.

  12. Kelly Guest

    Sure would love to see a foreign carrier - regardless of route or who they are - begin 787 service to PDX. While we appreciate Delta's offering of routes to NRT and AMS, we don't appreciate the fact that it's Delta operating them.

  13. Kevin Guest

    In addition Norwegian announced a bunch of 787 routes into Los Angeles and Oakland.

  14. Murali Guest

    Thanks Shane and Lucky. Yes YQ is an on going pain for transatlantic flights.

  15. lucky OMAAT

    @ murali -- Each way it'll cost 25,000 Avios in coach, 37,500 Avios in premium economy, or 50,000 Avios in business.

  16. lucky OMAAT

    @ Lark -- In theory, yes, though in practice I don't think we'll see that much innovation from United. They're using the 787s more as 767 replacements, and so far we haven't seen many innovative routes from them other than Denver to Tokyo.

    Keep in mind that when they first announced their 787 plans they had said they wanted to fly it to New Zealand first, which would've been awesome... though that hasn't happened yet.

  17. NB Guest

    @Stephan. I don't think it's the Grand Prix as that's only one weekend and it's before the route starts.

    @Mike. I'm sure it's all about taking European and Middle Eastern travellers to Austin - US flyers are more interested in miles than anything else.

    @Lark. I don't see UA innovating much with their 787s - they are too busy trying to downsize and replace their ancient wide body fleet.

  18. Shane Guest

    @murali, The problem with awards on BA will be fuel surcharges. They'll be steep (probably $600 pp)

  19. murali Guest

    This is great news! Any idea what the award pricing will look like? More than anything else, it can save good 6 hours in a round trip flight to Europe, with connecting times etc. Also, wonder if this will be an AA code share.

  20. Stephan Guest

    Suspect the US F1 Grand Prix had something to do with that decision.

  21. Mike Reed New Member

    As an Austinite it’s definitely nice to have this service, but the fare difference is such that connecting through Dallas into a widebody just makes sense. I suspect this will be more about destination traffic into Austin than anything originating here.

  22. Lark Guest

    This bodes well for United / United flyers, right?

    Doesn't UA have the largest number of 787's on order? Will be interesting to see additional route announcements.

    Only downside I see is when they take an existing route (SEA-NRT) and downguage it to a 787...

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Alex Guest

Given the variance in what fuel surcharge should be by aircraft type, the whole concept seems ripe for a class action lawsuit...

0
lucky OMAAT

@ Ivan Y -- Yep, in theory any added capacity should improve award space from that part of the country. At least in theory.

0
lucky OMAAT

@ Alex -- As Stephan notes the whole thing is a scam. I think there shouldn't be any at all and that the cost of fuel should be factored into the cost of a ticket. But you raise a great point given how fuel efficient the 787 is. Maybe it should have a battery surcharge instead. ;)

0
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
4,788,713 Miles Traveled

27,627,500 Words Written

32,315 Posts Published

Keep Exploring OMAAT
  • September 7, 2022
  • Ben Schlappig
113
Reclining Your Airplane Seat: Right Or Privilege?
  • May 28, 2022
  • Ben Schlappig
109
Should You Tip In Airport Lounges?