Boeing Raises Airbus A321XLR Safety Concerns

Ultimately aviation safety is a collaborative effort, but are there limits to that?

Boeing’s Airbus A321XLR fuel tank concerns

In June 2019, Airbus revealed the new A321XLR, which will be the longest range narrow body aircraft in the world in 2023, when deliveries are scheduled to start.

This plane has been extremely popular with airlines — hundreds have already been ordered, and Boeing is nowhere near having an aircraft that can compete with this, so it’s no doubt a huge competitive advantage for Airbus.

American Airlines has ordered 50 Airbus A321XLRs

Well, Bloomberg is reporting that Boeing has expressed safety concerns with the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) over the A321XLR. This is in response to a consultation paper by the regulator about Airbus’ plans to install insulation panels on the floor of the A321XLR.

In a filing, Boeing’s director of global regulatory strategy stated that:

“Fuel tanks integral to the airframe structure inherently provide less redundancy than structurally separate fuel tanks.”

Essentially the Airbus A321XLR will have extra fuel tanks underneath the floor of the passenger cabin, to give the plane additional range. Airbus is looking to install insulation panels between the cabin and fuel tanks — since there isn’t enough room to install ones fully meeting existing standards, the company needs some regulations to change.

Airbus now needs to prove through tests that these fuel tanks are as safe as previous designs. In the meantime Boeing is expressing concerns. The EASA has stated that it agrees with Boeing’s concerns around the “structural crashworthiness” of the tanks, and the risks of fire due to heat transfer from an external threat.

Airbus will have to prove that new A321XLR fuel tanks don’t pose a threat

Fair, ironic, or both?

Like I said, aviation safety is an industry-wide effort, so on the surface all safety concerns about a new design should be shared, in my opinion.

At the same time, given that this is coming from Boeing, the motive sure seems questionable. Boeing has just spent the past two years trying to get its 737 MAX ungrounded after two fatal crashes. Investigations have shown the extent to which Boeing tried to cover up safety concerns with the plane.

Yet here’s Boeing, publicly sharing safety concerns about Airbus’ newest plane, which it can’t compete with.

Personally I think Boeing’s feedback is ironic and not with the purest of intentions, but still fair, since ultimately all safety concerns should be addressed.

Should Boeing really be talking after the 737 MAX fiasco?

Bottom line

Boeing has raised concerns about the fuel tank design of Airbus’ new A321XLR aircraft, which is due to enter service in 2023. There’s no doubt a bit of irony to Boeing raising safety concerns about an Airbus aircraft after the 737 MAX fiasco, but hey, it’s probably all for the better in the end.

What do you make of Boeing’s concerns with the Airbus A321XLR?

Conversations (46)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Vince Guest

Boeing....hum, lithium batts...hum and how many fires, issues with these? Boeing should be more concerned about their own issues.

0
‼ 0
Tom Guest

It's quite simple, Boeing 737 Max plane has innumerable deficiencies, and it can't compete with Airbus A321XLR. Boeing had plenty of time to develop a NMA that would be suffice for U.S. air carriers. Its humorous to hear Boeing raise safety concerns about their rival. No problem! Airbus will deploy bigger and more powerful engines to compensate the extra weight gain, and still reach the 4700nm goal. Boeing should do what Airbus is doing " mastering" building planes that not only meets the needs of the U.S. air carriers, and its passengers, but surpassing those requirements. The epidemic of building cheap, for max " gain" are over, if Boeing builds great planes, people will fly them, until then, I'm waiting for the A321XLR, " delayed" but not " denied"

0
‼ 0
Maxmotor Guest

@ Ethan There were 21 A320-100 models manufactured.After an increase in maximum takeoff weight and range it became the A320-200.The limited number of 100 series manufuctured had nothing to do with safety.Pilot error was found to be the cause of the airshow crash.

0
‼ 0
Max Guest

By the way. Congratulations Ben for not removing comments under this article and not following other aviation websites which removed comments completely under articles abut this topic. It seems that your are much more resistant to Boing pressure for censoring negative comment about their smear campaign. One more time congratulations and big thank you.

0
‼ 0
Max Guest

Typical Boeing trash propaganda. They killed over 300 people with 737MAX du to their greed and now they talk about safety!? Is this some kind of joke? They don't have product which would compete with A321XLR so they start smear campaign instead of hard work on new airplane which airlines and passengers want. Boing is disgusting and I do not intend to fly on their airplanes especially 737MAX.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published