Uh Oh: Could Japan’s ANA & JAL Merge?

The Japanese government is hinting at the possibility of a merger between the nation’s two largest airlines. This comes just a week after we learned that South Korea’s two largest airlines — Asiana and Korean Air — will be merging.

Japanese government considers consolidation

The government of Japan is preparing to inject capital into the country’s airlines, in particular All Nippon Airways (ANA) and Japan Airlines (JAL). With Japan’s borders mostly closed, it goes without saying that these airlines are bleeding money.

Heizo Takenaka, who served on the Prime Minister’s Growth Strategy Council, has indicated that ANA and JAL will eventually need more support, and suggests that they should become one. Stocks of both airlines shot up following this news.

It goes without saying that this is still in the very early stages, and it doesn’t sound like any decision is imminent. It’s also noted that there are many ways they could go about this, from having one airline focus on domestic operations and one focus on international operations, or even just fully integrating operations.

It’s also anyone’s guess which airline would “survive” in terms of branding. There are pros and cons to both ANA and JAL, and both airlines are competitive in many ways. Personally I don’t think there’s one choice that’s more obvious than the other.

The government could inject capital into Japanese airlines

Let’s hope this doesn’t happen

There’s one major thing speaking in favor of a merger — if the government is going to provide funding to airlines, then in the short term I can understand how it doesn’t make sense to essentially be funding two airlines that are competing with one another.

But that doesn’t consider the long term implications of this:

  • While South Korea is one of the smaller countries to have two “large” full service airlines (it has a population of 51 million people), Japan is significantly more populous, with 127 million people
  • While I get that both airlines will likely be losing money for the next couple of years, the airlines were profitable prior to the pandemic
  • Long term it would be bad for consumers for the country to only have one global airline

ANA and JAL are among my favorite airlines in the world. Presumably that’s partly because they’re Japanese, and most things in Japan are awesome. However, beyond that I have no doubt that the two airlines having to compete so fiercely with one another has been a win for consumers, and has made them as good as they are.

A merger between ANA & JAL would be bad for consumers

Bottom line

The Japanese government may be injecting money into both ANA and JAL, and it sounds like the concept of a merger between the two airlines is at least being discussed.

While I can appreciate not wanting to fund two competing airlines in the short term, the long term implications of Japan only having one global airline would be terrible for consumers.

What do you think the odds are of a merger between ANA & JAL?

(Tip of the hat to Ron)

Conversations (31)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Miguel Guest

They have been profitable, mainly because for some routes (e.g Akita, Aomori...) they are the only way to go and a round-tripticket costs 70,000 JPY, (same as a round-trip to France). Second, for domestic flights their service is horrible, and ANA even sometimes asks its passengers to not use the toilet during the flight. In terms of service they are veeery far from Singapore Airlines, Air New Zealand, Qatar or Emirates level. Having said that, a merge is not the important thing, the point is to have more LCC companies and that the government tries to incentivate cheap airlines (as are Ryanair, Vueling or Norwegian in Europe>, because it doesnt make sense that in Europa a 2,000 mile frip costs 60 USD while in ANA or JAL costs an average of 300. Finally, u like Japan because u dont live here and u dont know well about the taxes here and the way to work here XD

0
‼ 0
Nick Guest

No mergers please.. I've got loads of AA miles I plan on unloading for JAL first again. What a wonderful product.

0
‼ 0
Bill Guest

ANA's international business service earlier this year was poor and their lounges overcrowded with lousy food. I've had better results flying United and eating in Polaris lounges. Maybe a merger would make them more of what they were several years ago.

0
‼ 0
Roman Guest

Maybe just a temporary merger of the airline division only for a short period say 5 years just to get them through this.

0
‼ 0
ryan0808 Gold

I think if the merger gets through then probably it would be JAL because it is the flag carrier.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published