Painful To Watch: American & British Airways Compare Their Business Class Products

It’s not really a secret how I feel about British Airways business class. Even when the food and service is good, the seat is my least favorite fully flat business class hard product I’ve ever flown.

Meanwhile even when American’s food and service is horrible, at least their reconfigured planes feature direct aisle access from every seat, and most of them feature Wi-Fi.

The two airlines are part of a transatlantic joint venture (along with Finnair and Iberia), so understandably they want to promote the benefits of it.

oneworld-transatlantic-joint-venture

However, I think they’ve taken it a step too far with their latest ad. It’s called “British Airways Versus American Airlines — Which Is Better?” In the ad, two kids (each representing an airline) argue whether American or British Airways business class is better. Eventually they come to the conclusion that both airlines are great.

Here’s the ad:

First of all, the kids in the ad are adorable, and the idea behind the ad is cute.

The problem is that the two kids basically come to the conclusion that both airlines are great. Why?

  • They both have fully flat seats
  • They both have noise canceling headphones
  • They both have personal touchscreen monitors with on-demand entertainment
  • They both have power supplies
  • They both have “luxury washbags”

After covering those points, they come to the conclusion that both airlines sound really good. Again, I get they’re trying to convey the message that American and British Airways have a joint venture, but I think collectively they’re really selling themselves short here. It’s not often I’m advocating for American’s onboard product, but…

Yes, it’s true they both have fully flat seats. But is anyone going to argue that these fully flat seats…

British-Airways-Business-Class-777 - 1

…are the same as these fully flat seats?

American-Business-Class

Is anyone going to argue that these noise canceling headphones…

British-Airways-A380-Business-Class - 11

…are the same as these Bose noise canceling headphones?

American-Business-Class-777-06

British Airways’ fleet is certainly more consistent, in the sense that all planes have the same sub-par fully flat business class seats.

But American has been investing a lot of money in their international hard product, and there are noteworthy aspects to the product, like direct aisle access from every seat, Bose noise canceling headphones, and Wi-Fi on many of their planes.

When trying to market the joint venture, American and British Airways should instead be focused on the number of daily flights they offer to London, etc. Perhaps the biggest problem with this ad is that virtually all airlines they’re competing with offer all those things — Delta, Virgin Atlantic, and United all have flat beds, power supplies, on-demand entertainment, amenity kits, etc.

But to literally do a side-by-side comparison of the products and to come to the conclusion that they’re basically the same and “both airlines are great” is really an insult to consumers, and also an insult to the money American has invested in their new seats. I guess that would explain why the video was posted on British Airways’ YouTube page, and not on American’s.

Or who knows, maybe American can integrate this into their “World’s Greatest Flyers” ad campaign — after all, the #GreatestFlyers don’t care whether they have direct aisle access or not, and the #GreatestFlyers don’t care whether there are eight or four seats per row, as long as they have a flat bed. 😉

Regardless, the biggest sin of this commercial is that it doesn’t do anything to differentiate the American and British Airways joint venture from the competition, since all major airlines offer what they’re advertising.

What do you think more of this ad? Are they focusing on the wrong similarities, or am I wrong about the onboard products?

(Tip of the hat to View from the Wing)

Conversations (46)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Tommy L New Member

BA have "enhanced" their advertising budget as well, I see. Such a disgraceful downgrade from the literal tear-jerkers of the past. *sigh*

0
‼ 0
Kyle Guest

BA has flat screen tvs! How amazing! *cringe*

1
‼ 0
Gordon Guest

I too used to sigh to discover my BA coded flight was operated by AA, but the new 777 product is excellent and now my preference over BA - except upper deck 747. In bed mode, the BA seat is actually my favourite because it allows me to raise my knees; which you can't do on AA, KLM, Delta or Qatar type seats where your lower legs are tunnelled within the seat infront. The major weaknesses of the BA seat is a lack of storage, combined with a tiny screen and small table. Once you are served food in BA you are stuck in the seat until service is over. BA service itself makes no effort to suggest quality e.g. removing plastic plate covers and decanting foil containers on to serving plate at seat. Overall I get the impression that BA continually tests the market to see how low they can go. The most recent further unbundling of the economy product will surely descend further. Their one saving grace is good lounges compared to the US and most other European carriers.

1
‼ 0
Ned Guest

This may be controversial but having been very impressed with the look of the new AA seat I found it uncomfortable for 7 hours in a way that the BA seat never is. The fold down ottoman is not flimsy on the BA planes as suggested by the author on recent reviews but it's for your feet, not your knees/fellow passengers to sit on etc. The Bose headphones on AA are nice but get taken off you an hour before you land and only Americans could give details of the Prosecco being served in the section titled champagne. Someone recently commented about how BA club is actually very competitive when it comes to seat width. How about an article that compares actual seat dimensions instead of the constant BA bashing? Yes, not having direct aisle access is arguably annoying but it is only an issue if the person is reclined with the footstool down in which case it really isn't a big step across their feet. My actual annoyance with the seat is that there is nowhere to stash the bottle of water they give you

0
‼ 0
Abhinav Agarwal Guest

BA is worried about Brexit and AA is worried about 2 poor probable Presidents. That's also a similarity! Lol, western world is like a sinking ship!

1
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published