Air France 777 Vandalized By Greenpeace

An Air France 777 has just been vandalized by Greenpeace at Charles de Gaulle Airport.

Greenpeace “paints” Air France 777 green

Today a group of Greenpeace protestors spray painted an Air France 777 green at Charles de Gaulle Airport. It’s not known how exactly they managed to bypass security and get onto the tarmac (but that seems like a safety concern, and someone should be held accountable), but they did manage to do so. They spent quite a while spray painting the plane, wearing white suits that said “greenwashing in progress.”

The plane that was spray painted was an Air France 777-200ER with the registration code F-GSPB. The plane was delivered to the airline in 1998, and hasn’t flown for nearly a year. The last flight for this plane was on March 17, 2020, from Rio de Janeiro to Paris.

For those of you not familiar with Greenpeace, it’s a non-governmental environmental organization that describes itself as using “non-violent creative action to pave the way towards a greener, more peaceful world, and to confront the systems that threaten our environment.”

What was Greenpeace’s motive?

Greenpeace is angry because the organization believes a significant reduction in air traffic is needed to address climate change. Here’s how Greenpeace’s website describes its actions and stance:

This morning, Greenpeace activists entered the tarmac at Roissy-Charles de Gaulle airport to denounce the government’s greenwashing on the air. Faced with the climate crisis, it is necessary to regulate and reduce air traffic so that it is compatible with the Paris Agreement, while anticipating the reconversion of this sector and the social consequences that this would have for all workers. and affected workers.

A few days before the start of parliamentary debates on the “Climate and Resilience” bill, we would like to firmly remind you that the technological innovations so much praised by the Minister for Transport, Jean-Baptiste Djebbari, will not be enough to stem the climate crisis. The regulation and reduction of air traffic are essential.

Specifically, Greenpeace argues the following:

  • All airport expansion projects in France need to be stopped
  • Flights should be banned for markets that have train service that takes less than 6hr; previously the government had agreed to a policy like this for train rides of up to 2hr30min
  • More money needs to be invested into train service, so that it’s available in even more markets
  • Airlines shouldn’t be able to get out of their environmental obligations through carbon offsetting, but rather they need to reduce emissions significantly, and this can’t just come through getting more fuel efficient planes

If you’re wondering how politicians are taking this feedback, it seems like the answer is “not very well.” Greenpeace France Tweeted at French Transport Minister Jean-Baptiste Djebbari, saying the following:

“So with all these elements @Djebbari_JB: when do you really start reducing air traffic, to bring the sector into line with the climate emergency?”

Djebbari simply responded to that Tweet by saying:

“Criminal proceedings?”

Bottom line

Greenpeace managed to break into the secure area of Charles de Gaulle Airport and spray paint an Air France 777 green, as part of an environmental protest. The organization is doing this a few days before France’s government discusses a climate bill.

Conversations (53)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

SBS Diamond

@J2K - WV Tesla was just too funny to burden it with technical details :) I completely agree with your post on substance, though. Regenerative braking is a major advantage of electric and hybrid cars, and of course even if this particular Tesla is not charged from solar panels, one can still buy all-renewable electricity in some places. Of course, the same Greenpeace Luddites protest against transmission lines that make things like Eastern Interconnection possible. Electric cars are less of a choice for people living in old apartment/condo buildings that lack the infrastructure for chargers - and there are plenty of these buildings, especially in New England, New York, and elsewhere in old industrial Northeast.

0
‼ 0
Grant Member

It’s a shame this didn’t happen at sea. The French Navy is 1-0 versus greenfarce in what was quite a decisive win some years back.

0
‼ 0
Jim Member

Hmmmm... Greenpeace, it’s a non-governmental environmental organization that describes itself as using “non-violent creative action to pave the way towards a greener, more peaceful world, and to confront the systems that threaten our environment.” In the States, vandalism is considered an act of violence, at least under federal law. I guess Greenpeace is not longer using non-violent ways. I also agree, someone or more needs to be held accountable for the security breach. I can see TSA ordering Air France to increase security checks on those flying to the U.S. because of this.

0
‼ 0
J2K Guest

@SBS While I agree with the valid technical points you make, I have to nitpick your WV Tesla anecdote. It is funny on the face of it, nevertheless two big things are missed here, which I've see said again and again. So here goes. 1) While 91% of electricity generated within WV's borders may be from coal, this is not the same electricity on its grid. All of WV is under PJM, which is an operator that runs an area much larger than WV. PJM itself is part of the Eastern interconnection of the US, which covers. The mix of generation within PJM and the eastern US has a much smaller fraction of coal than 0.91. In fact there's a good bit of nuclear. 2) MOST IMPORTANTLY: When people say that EVs are powered by fossil fuels, they're missing that EVs use regenerative braking a ton, and so make much more efficient use of their energy to produce motion. Same reason a Tesla rarely needs a brake job. Even if the charge is from >50% coal + gas generation, this might still beat a non-hybrid gasoline car on CO2 emissions. Why? Because the latter can't put the genie back in the bottle. Once you burn the gas to spin the engine, most of the energy is lost as heat, whether through friction or out the tailpipe. Braking does nothing to help that, just costs money (typically more for those who fly past me to sit at that visibly red light).

0
‼ 0
Vidargun Guest

@UpperDeckJohnny So true - this is actually the only solution to our climate challenges. Nobody would ever give up 90% of their income and live like paupers for saving our environment and earth.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published