Catastrophe Narrowly Avoided For Air Canada A320 At SFO

Aviation is incredibly safe — arguably commercial flying is the safest way to travel — but that doesn’t mean things always go as planned. For every disaster there are a countless number of situations where disaster is narrowly avoided.

This past Friday night just minutes before midnight, an Air Canada A320 was approaching San Francisco Airport (SFO). The flight was coming from Toronto, and was carrying 140 passengers and crew. The plane was on final approach to runway 28R with good visibility when the following happened, per The Aviation Herald:

A short time after reading back the landing clearance the crew queried tower to confirm they were cleared to land advising they were seeing lights on the runway, tower advised the runway was clear and they were cleared to land indeed. Another voice chimed in calling they were lined up with the taxiway, tower immediately instructed AC-759 to go around as result commenting it looked like they were lined up for taxiway C. The aircraft went around from about 400 feet MSL. Other flight crew taxiing their aircraft on taxiway C commented the A320 was flying straight over them. The A320 positioned for another approach and landed safely about 15 minutes later.

Here’s the audio of the incident, which really puts the incident into perspective:

There were four planes awaiting takeoff on the taxiway that the A320 was about to land on. The Air Canada pilot tried to clarify with ATC that the runway was clear, because he saw lights. Little did the tower know that he was referring to the taxiway and not the runway. That was when the United pilot chimed in and said “where’s this guy going? He’s on the taxiway!” Then ATC instructed the Air Canada flight to go around. It landed 15 minutes later without incident.

For a bit of context, here’s a video of a nighttime landing on runway 28R at SFO. The green lights off to the right are that of the taxiway that the pilots were supposedly lined up to land on.

This is obviously a very serious incident that could have ended very differently. No one can really say for sure what would have happened if the United pilot hadn’t told ATC what he saw. The go around happened at just a few hundred feet, so this was all very close to landing.

This isn’t the first time that a plane has almost landed on a taxiway rather than a runway, though fortunately every time that has happened there weren’t planes on the taxiway, so this would have been a much more serious situation. When this has happened in the past, it has almost always been during the day. The thing is, at night runway lights look very different than taxiway lights, so it should be easier to distinguish the two.

However, I imagine we’re talking about two very experienced pilots with thousands of hours here, so it’s easy for me to sit behind my keyboard and say that. They were coming from Toronto so it was approaching 3AM “their time,” so it’s possible fatigue played an issue, that their eyes were failing them a bit, etc.

Regardless, this is a scary incident, and it’s now being investigated by the FAA.

(Tip of the hat to airliners.net)

Conversations (24)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Bob Guest

As a 30 year corporate pilot operating thru SFO for many years .. it's not uncommon for mistakes to happen and corrected before they become accidents. If we can learn from this situation is that both flight crews from air Canada and united spoke up when they noticed something wrong and saved the day. If air Canada did not query ATC when he saw lights on "what he thought was runway" this gave the united crew the clue they neeed to speak up and save the day, or this would have turned out much worse. Never be afraid to question anything in the world we live in today. In my profession opinion, even though the air Canada crew made the initial mistake they also communicated to ATC before it was to late ....and United crew was smart enough to catch it. This is a what professional pilots and ATC train for all our lives.

0
‼ 0
Basil Guest

I actually reached out to United via email and told them that they need to find and commend the pilot of UAL 1 who probably saved 1000 lives that night - I got a very nice email response - here it is - Dear Mr. XXXXX: Thank you for sharing this link. I read the story and listened to the recording. I'll forward your comments to the Pilot's supervisor and senior management, so he can be recognized. It was very kind of you to take the time to write. Thank you for your business and 1 Million Miler Premier Gold MileagePlus loyalty. We look forward to serving you on your next United flight. Regards, Dayna Winters Corporate Customer Care Case ID: 12483585

0
‼ 0
Anonymous Guest

Couldn't agree more with William Y. I would say the best course of action to protect American lives, would be a total ban on all foreign airlines from landing anywhere on US soil altogether. Who's with me? #MAGA

0
‼ 0
William Y. Guest

@PeterG: >Lets assume he was lined up for 28R ( why wouldn’t he be?) Yeah, let's not. Since the real pilots on the ground actually said he was not. He missed them by 100 ft. vertical, for f€cks sake. Why do you people have this insane need to defend the foreign pilot's right to kill 1000+ Americans? Do you think it'll somehow stick it to President Trump or what?

0
‼ 0
Chris K Guest

@Rhys Maybe my term "visual approach" was not entirely correct. Let's say non-ILS approach is less safe than one guided by ILS. This is because non-ILS approach increases the probability of pilot error, leading to a higher risk of controlled flight into terrain accidents. My guess is that 30 percent of all accidents featured in mayday episodes happened when pilots tried to land on a runway or runway direction without ILS or with the existing ILS switched off or out of order.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published