Who Is Right In the UK’s Battle On Airport Retailers?

On Tuesday I wrote about the interesting situation going on with airport shops in the UK, which is outraging consumers.

UK retailers pocketing VAT on duty free purchases

To briefly summarize, basically UK airport retailers request your boarding pass when you purchase something, whether it’s a pack of gum or an expensive bottle of champagne. The prices include VAT (value added tax), and they charge it to you regardless of whether you’re traveling within the UK/EU or not. If you’re traveling within the UK/EU, that VAT has to be paid to the government. If you’re traveling outside the UK/EU, the retailers are pocketing the 20% VAT.

To contrast that to the US system, here we have duty free shops which show prices without tax. If you are in fact traveling internationally (and can prove it by showing your boarding pass), you’ll receive the tax free pricing. However, you can still buy something from the shop if traveling domestically, but tax will be added to the purchase price.

To many this felt like UK retailers “stealing” from consumers in a sneaky way, and caused outrage.

Heathrow-Duty-Free

What has the response been?

Well, the story that broke earlier this week seems to have gone somewhat viral, and that has resulted in a few things.

First of all, some are calling on the UK government to make a law requiring shops to pass on the tax savings to consumers. Via The Telegraph:

Shops should be forced by law to reduce their prices in airports, the retail watchdog has said, as it urged ministers to pass new legislation to end the VAT rip-off.

“We don’t have any powers to make retailers adhere because [passing on the VAT relief] is not law,” the head of the dispute arbiter told BBC Radio 4.

“The Government needs to make this a law [and] say to the retailers in airports you must, not we want you to, you must pass on this relief and you must make it very clear to your shoppers what it is they are getting for their money.”

Furthermore, as mentioned above, passengers are under no obligation to show their boarding passes when making purchases. Of course retailers want to see the boarding passes since there’s a chance they can pocket 20% on purchases. But it seems not all retailers are adhering to that rule:

On Wednesday, however, reporters from this newspaper found many shops at Heathrow were declining customers who refused to show their boarding cards.

Shop staff in Boots said as many as half of customers were refusing to give their flight details. In defiance, one person waved above their head the pages of a newspaper displaying the story.

The Telegraph also found evidence that customers who complained were wrongly told it was a “requirement” under airport rules for all shops to check boarding cards.

In the text of an email, seen by this newspaper, a Dixons Travel representative wrote: “I can confirm that the requirement to check the boarding pass at all our airport stores is in compliance with the BAA rules and this is not our own policy.”

When challenged, a spokesman for the company said: “We can confirm that this is not our policy and this advice was incorrect.”

There seems to be a lot of misinformation out there. If the retailers want to defend this practice then they at least have to follow the correct rules rather than making up their own, or they’ll really be in trouble.

Why retailers aren’t wrong (other than how they’re going about it)

It’s easy to think of this as the greedy retailers “stealing” 20% of the money of travelers. But I don’t think that’s the case.

The reality is that operating retail shops at airports is expensive. Rent is higher and staff are often paid more. Yet in many cases airport retailers have the same prices as outside the airport. Margins in retail can sometimes be quite small, so there’s a good chance that a large percentage of profits for airport retailers actually come from the VAT refunds they pocket.

Let’s be practical here. Some are suggesting airport retailers should be forced to “reduce” their prices since they’re pocketing the 20% VAT for many travelers. That’s not happening.

What are the possible solutions?

  • Airport retailers could raise prices across the board and then issue the 20% refund to those traveling outside the UK/EU
  • In terms of logistics, retailers could list the UK/EU traveler price and then the non-UK/EU traveler price; this would likely complicate things, increase wait times, and increase staffing requirements, all of which could further raise prices
  • Airport retailers could maintain the status quo, perhaps with a bit more transparency about the system, or at least posted signs about why passengers are being asked for their boarding passes

I do take issue with the lack of transparency involved, and in particular with the misinformation from retail associates claiming that showing a boarding pass is a requirement, which isn’t the case. Consumers reasonably assume that when they’re asked for their boarding pass past security there’s a reason for it, other than a retailer trying to pocket cash from them.

But this battle isn’t as simple as airport retailers meeting their profitability goals and then just pocketing an extra 20% on many travelers. That 20% is probably an integral part of retailers’ bottom line.

I’ll be curious to see what happens with this. It doesn’t impact me one way or another, since I don’t remember the last time I’ve bought anything at an airport in the UK. That being said, I think consumers should be careful what they wish for, because if retailers lose a lot of their VAT refunds, it will likely result in price increases.

What do you think is the solution to the UK airport VAT/boarding pass fiasco?

(Tip of the hat to Mike)

Conversations (20)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Troy Guest

How is this not fraud? If the money is collected under the assumption that it's tax, then it should be paid as tax. If the retailer were to add a 5% surcharge which was to be donated to a charity, but not actually donate anything, would that not be illegal? The argument that they already have high operating costs, or higher overheads for being at an airport premises is rubbish. No one forced their hand into opening a business at the airport, and they should have known their operating costs going into the deal and be ensuring sufficient margins to allow them to trade and make a profit without resorting to scamming customers. Also worth noting that for the higher end retails stores - like your Gucci & Prada etc, most of their "standard" retail stores are located in premium locations. Thus they would already be budgeting significantly higher operating costs - so you would expect the difference in operating costs compared to an airport to be minimal. Lastly i don't think it's unjustified for an business located at the airport to charge a premium over what they may charge at other locations. You pay for convenience and location with everything you buy. The only issue is when that premium becomes almost extortion IE a bottle of water past security being double the cost of the same bottle prior to security etc..

0
‼ 0
callum Guest

Not really, as you'd have a continuous stream of people arguing about how deceptive it is because they thought they'd get the cheaper price. All this shows is how ridiculous and petty the UK public is. I'm incredibly glad I no longer have to work in retail.

0
‼ 0
@mkcol Gold

Ben you say "In terms of logistics, retailers could list the UK/EU traveler price and then the non-UK/EU traveler price; this would likely complicate things, increase wait times, and increase staffing requirements, all of which could further raise prices" This is precisely how it used to be done with very simple, clear, colour coded price tags on the shelf. It didn't complicate anything for anyone, wait times at tills are no different now, staffing requirements I doubt would be any different either - how so? Because the scanned boarding card would indicate which price you were entitled to!

0
‼ 0
Paul Feagan Guest

I originally wrote about this on my www.bugadvisor.com blog back in November last year although my focus was on the inconvenience of having to retrieve and show a boarding pass when buying a sandwich. At the time I wrote to Boots and asked them to confirm that I could decline to show my boarding pass - they replied that I was within my rights not to show the pass and I've been refusing every week when I fly since that date. There was one time when a lady at Boots LHR T3 was a bit funny with me, but apart from that all the staff were okay. If you'd like to read the Boots letter in full then it is here http://wp.me/p2BxLS-hZ

0
‼ 0
David Guest

The price being advertised is almost always £x including VAT where legally due. As such, they are effectively advertising that the price is the same for everyone but EU passengers have a VAT component included. It allows them to offer fixed pricing to all passengers while ensuring an adequate margin to cover their costs. Other companies do this too. For example, Uber in Australia has some drivers who are registered for GST (the equivalent of VAT) and some who aren't. So their prices are advertised as "inclusive of GST where payable" but are the same total irrespective of the incidence of GST.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published