US Airlines Will Recall Furloughed Workers In $15 Billion Aid Deal

It looks like 32,000 furloughed airline employees will be back on the payroll for four months, in what can only be described as a very expensive deal.

$900 billion stimulus deal includes money for airlines

A bipartisan $900 billion stimulus deal is expected to be approved by lawmakers in the US shortly. This includes $600 stimulus checks for Americans, and some support for small businesses, but there’s also big support for airlines.

As part of the stimulus deal, US airlines are expected to get $15 billion in support, with similar conditions to the initial CARES Act. The major restriction is that airlines will have to put furloughed workers back on the payroll between December 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021.

US airlines furloughed a combined 32,000 employees as of October 1, 2020, when the initial CARES Act funding ran out. Those furloughs were almost entirely at American and United, while airlines like Delta and Southwest didn’t have any furloughs.

American furloughed the most workers among US airlines

These payroll costs are through the roof

I find the government’s approach towards providing airline support to be bizarre. First of all, since this is payroll support, is the intent of the $15 billion to prevent job losses? If so:

  • Spending $15 billion to put 32,000 people on the payroll breaks down to $468,750 per furloughed employee, and that’s to get them on the payroll for four months; that’s a salary of over $1.4 million per year
  • Airlines that haven’t furloughed workers are getting payroll support
  • This isn’t accomplishing much, because the pay is partly retroactive, and these employees will likely once again be furloughed come April 1, or more accurately, airlines will be looking for a third round of payroll support in order to “save airline jobs”

At the same time I have compassion. I feel bad for all the airline employees who have lost their jobs. I think they deserve help, and I think the government should do more for them.

But there has to be a middle ground between many Americans getting $600 checks and nothing else, and airlines somehow getting a deal that’s purported to be saving airline jobs, but at the cost of $468,750 per person for four months of payroll.

I guess I just have to come to the realization that the government (regardless of party) is very bad at efficiently spending money. This deal will benefit airline stocks more than anything.

Airlines have been grasping at straws to find reasons to claim they need aid, especially after downsizing their workforces the way they did. The most recent reasoning is the vaccine. Airlines claim they need aid so that they can help with transporting the vaccine, when that logic is quite backwards — transporting the vaccine will be good business for airlines, and it’s something they’ll make money doing.

Even airlines that didn’t furlough workers are getting funding

Bottom line

Airlines are expected to get $15 billion in payroll support as part of the new $900 billion stimulus. This will require airlines to once again put furloughed workers on the payroll for four months, though there are absolutely no guarantees these employees will have jobs come April 1.

With demand definitely not having recovered by then, you can bet that airlines will be looking for more funding in the spring.

Don’t get me wrong, though. I feel bad for all the furloughed airline workers who have likely been out of work and struggling, and am happy they’ll be getting a paycheck. I just wish more than a small percentage of the money actually went to people.

What do you make of this latest round of support for airlines?

Conversations (63)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Denzel Guest

As the taxpayers are bearing the financial burden, each airline should produce a business plan, available publicly, which accounts for the ask. The government should then appoint a 3rd party financial oversight committee which has ongoing access to the books and can verify that the appropriate transactions are taking place. If an airline is not willing to do that then, sorry, no dollars. I view the airlines as critical infrastructure; however, if they're leveraging public dollars then they need to be subject to greater scrutiny.

0
‼ 0
John New Member

Ben - Thank you. You get it! I, the American tax payer does not want my money going to pay flight attendants to sit at home and do nothing. This money disincentivizes them to look for another career. The industry will be smaller for years. There needs to be natural attrition to other industries. The money should have been given to all travel industries not just Airlines. What industry has the most consumer complaints? Airlines. Yet here WE are bailing them out. Let them fail. Once demand is back another will take their place.

0
‼ 0
Trolly Dolly Guest

There are far more than 32,000 airline employees affected by PSP, some of whom have continued to work in the midst of the health crisis among those who don't believe the virus is real or that airlines have a right to manage behavior on their premises with mask requirements or social distancing. And there are thousands of who have taken a voluntary leave of absence to mitigate the massive staffing surplus brought on by plummeting travel demand. No, senior employees did not sit on their ass while earning a regular paycheck but have been struggling to meet financial obligations while collecting meager unemployment benefits, hoping for a return to economic recovery. Extension of COVID relief is overdue for the entire nation, not just for privileged few in DC who are unaffected and don't need it

0
‼ 0
Chase Guest

Ridiculous, as usual. The Unions negotiated well in advance how all this was going to work when times got tough (reverse seniority furloughs), and that’s where they’re at now. Employees signed up for it when they agreed to be employed at the carriers and belong with the Unions. This is why Ben’s math is correct; the specious argument that the money covers ‘all’ is not reality, because the company and Union already laid out the process when costs don’t match revenues if they need to use it. There were no ambiguities involved until everyone started sniffing at the public trough in the name of ‘saving’ a few more jobs at insanely high costs for an extra 4 months. It’s a colossal waste of money on an industry that is no stranger to booms and busts. If you don’t like it...get another job, perhaps a more STABLE one if that’s most important to you!

0
‼ 0
David Guest

@David I agree. Airlines exist in a realm of entitlement/"alternative facts". But, in the error....um, ahh ERA...of C19 isn't that true of a large swath of society? The US Airline industry doesn't "work" when confronting rapid fundamental "change". Deregulation slayed a # of marquee UNIVERSAL BRANDS (i.e. Pan Am). 9/11 sliced legacy brands in half UA/AA/DL...no more CO/NW/HP-US. C19...??? With the exception of deregulation...airlines were dramatically impacted by events that occurred in a finite period of time & resulted in seismic change. Deregulation was a could/might/maybe....the economics were unknown & the "change" couldn't be properly forecasted for years/decades. The logical question is-----precisely what's different circa Dec 2020 than April 2020? The one absolute is that $25B won't "buy" DEMAND....so, obviously $15B ain't gonna "buy" demand. The Globe is racing towards a positive C19 "tipping point" due to Herd-Immunity (yes, that's been "organically" happening for the past 10+ months) & 2 >90% vaccines...the "tipping point" will occur when #'s crater....the problem is that the hour/date/month of the "tipping point" is unknown. Argghh...it's all too confusing & such a colossal failure....when that "tipping point" occurs, I know that I can NEVER go (sans mask) to my favorite restaurant & plan a big family vacation...the restaruant no longer exists. Albeit, C19 has allowed for gained perspective. A 50yr old friend posted a "C19 Rant" upon FB....& he is (was) a logical & considerate person. His premise was that @ 50yr he had about 25 "good yrs" left & thus 1yr = 4% of his life & the C19 risk was, on a % basis, fantastically improbable that he'd contract it & die....so lockdowns/masks/etc were by definition "insanity". He did a lot of math & his #'s appeared logical...he got a lot of thumbs-up & comments, etc. I simply asked----"What happens if you flip your numbers & skew them towards everything that you could possibly need medical attention for---car accident, bike crash, chest pains, sudden slurred speech. You start slurring your words at breakfast, your wife jumps into action & your en-route to the hospital within 5 mins. You arrive at the hospital &....no space, they're turning people away....your wife argues w/ Nurses...and then a Nurse says....you'd better get a move on to Hospital # 2...tick-tock, the "golden hour". Finally, you arrive at Hospital #3 & they immediately inject Activase 4 hours after onset of symptoms. Well, unfortunately you missed the "golden window" & you need speech rehab & physical rehab....and that's all because of an overwhelmed healthcare system due to C19 & your 4% stupidity exercise actually equates to your QOL being 50% of what you imagined for the next 25 yrs". Oddly, I was un-friended....maybe it's not just airlines that exist in a realm of entitlement & "alternative facts"....its also where a lot of our friends reside! -David

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published

Keep Exploring OMAAT
  • March 18, 2020
  • Kate
53
Canada Is Closed