United Starnet blocking is back in full force

United Starnet blocking is back in full force

12

Two days ago I wrote a follow up on my “what’s a mile or point” worth post from about six months ago, and I talked about how United’s miles have increased in value. My reasoning was that United hasn’t been Starnet blocking for several months now, which is the practice of blocking partner award availability to (essentially) save money. Now, I’m positive it’s a coincidence, but as if somehow magic, United seems to be Starnet blocking again as of two days ago.

Actually, for me it has been among the worst I’ve seen in a while. I’ve been working mostly with Lufthansa first and business class awards, so can’t speak to other airlines, but it has been really, really bad for Lufthansa flights.

Here’s to hoping it’s not a permanent change at Mileage Plus. C’mon, Jeff, show us the “changes in the months ahead” that you think we’ll like!

Conversations (12)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Tom Guest

    Starnet Blocking + CO's sparse saver reward inventory on their metal (especially premium international travel) = Big trouble for those who fly the 'new United'

  2. Ryan New Member

    I booked my honeymoon on LH F a few months ago - best 270K miles anyone ever spent! Thank goodness I got it then and didn't wait to decide where or when to go.

  3. Darren Guest

    Sigh... I'm going to be optimistic and predict this is just a temporary tightening while the fine folks managing that inventory have their holiday breaks.

  4. Eric Guest

    I helped my parents book an LH award last night, which included DEN-FRA in F. C was available as well, on multiple days.

  5. Sam Guest

    @ gary

    so they are blocking so you can use the miles on a different *A carrier at the different time that'll probably cost UA the same amount of money anyways? The miles are still on the books as a liability for UA until you've used them, and assuming that people aren't just going to let the miles expire when they get *net blocked.

    The more they block the more people have the spend...

    @ gary

    so they are blocking so you can use the miles on a different *A carrier at the different time that'll probably cost UA the same amount of money anyways? The miles are still on the books as a liability for UA until you've used them, and assuming that people aren't just going to let the miles expire when they get *net blocked.

    The more they block the more people have the spend their miles on UA, and therefore UA will end up with a relatively balanced budget with its partners.

  6. Gary Gold

    @Sam that is NOT correct. The whole point of Starnet blocking was to prevent Mileage Plus from paying partners more than they had budgeted, NOT to get them to book via United. That's why blocking exists on routes not served by United, to destinations not served by United. When Mileage Plus blocked BKK-KTM flights almost every day it wasn't because they wanted you to fly United to KTM...

    It's been 3 months since the last...

    @Sam that is NOT correct. The whole point of Starnet blocking was to prevent Mileage Plus from paying partners more than they had budgeted, NOT to get them to book via United. That's why blocking exists on routes not served by United, to destinations not served by United. When Mileage Plus blocked BKK-KTM flights almost every day it wasn't because they wanted you to fly United to KTM...

    It's been 3 months since the last major blockage which lasted about 10 days. We've been really fortunate, only 10 days of blocking in 7 months until now. So sad to see it return, presumably keeping costs down before year-end.

  7. Sam Guest

    @ bschaff1

    the whole point of *net blocking was to get people use UA inventory, and it looks like its working. Here's to hopping its just a christmas thing.

  8. bschaff1 Guest

    I had no problem booking UA F TATL, but couldn't find anything else in F. It looks like all the LH and LX F has disappeared, but there is tons of C availability. Notable, I had no problem getting LH F on FRA-SIN. I was searching the same awards the last month and F is noticeable gone. In all honesty, as long as I can snag C awards I'm generally happy.

  9. david-alexis Guest

    US is doing the same (maybe or IT issue) I think it might be because of year end, maybe a high demand for reward seats during the hollidays, don't you think?

  10. Sean Guest

    Closing in on their year end budget numbers?

  11. Matthew Guest

    Yeah, SFO-MUC and FRA-ORD in LH F blocked for me.

    I thought we were past this...

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Bizarre, reverse, unexplainable Starnet blocking by United… - One Mile at a Time Guest

[...] little over a week ago I wrote about how United’s Starnet blocking is back in full force. For those of you not familiar with Starnet blocking, it’s the practice of blocking partner [...]

0
Tom Guest

Starnet Blocking + CO's sparse saver reward inventory on their metal (especially premium international travel) = Big trouble for those who fly the 'new United'

0
Ryan New Member

I booked my honeymoon on LH F a few months ago - best 270K miles anyone ever spent! Thank goodness I got it then and didn't wait to decide where or when to go.

0
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
4,788,713 Miles Traveled

27,627,500 Words Written

32,315 Posts Published

Keep Exploring OMAAT