Vietnam Airlines Boeing 787 Suffers Botched Takeoff In Munich: Runway Overrun, Tail Strike, Shredded Tires

Over the weekend, a Vietnam Airlines Boeing 787 had an accident while taking off on a long haul flight from Germany to Vietnam. Fortunately no one was injured, though this has to be one of the most unusual and terrifying close calls we’ve seen in a long time.

I’d like to post a recap of what happened and an update, because the Civil Aviation Authority of Vietnam (CAAV) has just released its preliminary report into this incident, and it only deepens the mystery.

Vietnam Airlines 787 struggles to take off on very long runway

This incident happened on Saturday, August 15, 2026, and involves Vietnam Airlines flight VN34, scheduled to fly from Munich (MUC) to Hanoi (HAN). The flight was operated by a 10-year-old Boeing 787-9 with the registration code VN-A867.

At 1:57PM local time, the plane started its takeoff roll on runway 26L, which is 4,000 meters (13,123 feet) long. This is about as long as commercial runways get, so it’s way longer than what even a fully loaded Dreamliner would need.

However, something went seriously wrong with this takeoff. The plane accelerated down the runway… and kept accelerating, and accelerating, and accelerating. Eventually the plane overran the end of the runway, causing damage to runway lights. In the video you can see that huge clouds of dust rose around the aircraft, as the tail struck the ground.

Fortunately the plane did manage to become airborne, though the crew immediately declared an emergency. The plane climbed to 10,000 feet, and the crew reported that they had an indicator that they had an issue with tire pressure.

The plane circled around the area for around 90 minutes (either to burn or dump fuel), at which point the aircraft performed two low approaches over the runway, so damage could be assessed.

The path for Vietnam Airlines flight VN34

Then the plane landed on runway 26R on the third approach, and it became disabled on the runway, closing the runway for an extended period of time. That landing was at 3:57PM, two hours after the plane first took off.

There’s even video footage from inside the cabin during the takeoff.

Then there are pictures showing the tire damage and tail strike after the plane returned to Munich.

I think it’s safe to assume that this plane will be on the ground for quite some time, and isn’t going anywhere any time soon…

Preliminary report gives some clues about what happened

Looking at the video of the takeoff, there’s nothing that stands out to me as being particularly unusual. It looks like the plane is accelerating decently, the flaps are in use, etc. But the plane just keeps going and going.

On the surface, it’s hard to comprehend what could’ve happened here. If the pilots felt something was off during the takeoff roll, they’d logically abort the takeoff. And a 13,000+ foot runway is particularly long, so they should’ve had a major buffer here.

Typically when we see incidents like this, it’s because the takeoff performance for the plane wasn’t calculated correctly. Did the crew not have the right “numbers” for this flight when determining takeoff performance? It appears there may be a little bit more to this.

While we’ll have to wait some time for a full investigation to be performed, Vietnamese authorities have released some preliminary details about the incident, based on flight data and interviews with the pilots:

  • Around halfway down the runway, the pilots noticed that the speed stopped increasing for around two seconds
  • The plane then reached the V1 speed (“the point of no return,” the speed at which pilots commit to taking off), but then the speed dropped again
  • The pilots decided there wasn’t enough runway left to reject the takeoff, so they increased engine power and rotated the plane, with around 91 meters (299 feet) remaining
  • At that point the 787 left the paved runway, had a tail strike, and four of the main gear tires lost pressure
  • At the time of the incident, the plane weighed 240 tons, under its maximum takeoff weight of 247.2 tons, and the weather was good

This preliminary report does somewhat explain how this issue is likely more complex than just incorrect weight calculations. The investigation is now about why the plane didn’t continue to gain speed during its takeoff roll. We also now understand why the pilots reportedly didn’t abort the takeoff, since they reached their V1 speed.

I think we also have to acknowledge how close this was to being a catastrophe. Imagine if the plane was just a little bit slower, and then ended up in the grass, where it would almost certainly not have been able to gain speed and then get airborne anymore. Everyone onboard that flight should be grateful to be alive.

Bottom line

A Vietnam Airlines Boeing 787 had a seriously messed up takeoff from Munich, as the plane overran the runway on takeoff, causing it to damage runway lights and strike its tail, with huge clouds of dust rising. When the plane came back to land, it also had serious issues with its tires, and the full damage of the tail strike was discovered.

Particularly given how long Munich Airport’s runway is, this is a really wild incident. A preliminary report suggests that during the takeoff roll, the pilots noticed that the plane stopped gaining speed, and at one point, even slowed down a bit. However, at that point the pilots felt they no longer had enough runway to stop.

This could’ve had a much worse ending. I’m curious to see what we learn as the investigation continues…

What do you make of this Vietnam Airlines runway overrun in Munich?

Conversations (80)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Win Whitmire Guest

Whether flying a General Aviation aircraft or a Part 121/135 aircraft, there's an unwritten "rule" called "50/70". V1, not withstanding, if the aircraft has not accelerated to 70% of VR by the time you reach 50% of the runway length, you need to STOP! There's another couple of speeds that we review before the takeoff. 80K is for two things: It provides a visual that the aircraft airspeed indicators are functioning AND they agree on speed. It also delineates the "low speed" vs "high speed" abort procedures. V1, you gotta fly (BUT there is a caveat), VR, rotation and V2 (single engine climb speed) and V2+20 (single engine maneuvering speed). Up to 80K we will discontinue the takeoff for just about anything. Between 80K and V1, we will discontinue takeoff for any fire or fire warning, an engine failure, fear that the jet won't fly and a direct wind shear alert. After V1, we will abort ONLY if we fear the jet won't fly OR no runway left to fly. That's where the balanced field length (already figured into the various airspeeds) is considered. Rather than do the math, the "50/70" rule will work. A low speed abort, the crew will talk among themselves and with company maintenance as to whether to try the takeoff again or go back to the gate. A high speed abort...back to the gate PERIOD either under power or towed in.

0
‼ 0
Chris Guest

boeing 787 wonderbox ?! terrible manufacture nowadays...

0
‼ 0
Tim Dunn Diamond

I would imagine the Europeans are doing their own investigation and they will get to the issue of what really went on. If there is an allegation of potential engine failure or misoperation, I am sure GE will be involved pretty quickly to understand what happened.

0
‼ 0
polarbear Diamond

ISn't there is a video somewhere from airport vehicle showing breaking marks close to the end of the runway. Anyway, preliminary report is due soon - this will tell

0
‼ 0
UncleRonnie Diamond

Gross incompetence from both pilots. Set off down the runway, then pick up a magazine and read it expecting the computer to send the plane safely into the air? Morons.

0
‼ 1

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published