Yikes: United Boeing 767 Strikes Truck & Light Pole On Newark Approach

When you’re driving on the highway, you don’t generally expect that you’re at risk of being hit by a commercial aircraft. Yet that’s exactly what just happened. I first covered this yesterday, but would like to provide an update, as some more details have been made available.

United 767 causes damage on New Jersey Turnpike

This incident happened on Sunday, May 3, 2026, and involves United Airlines flight UA169, flying from Venice (VCE) to Newark (EWR). Specifically, the flight was operated by a 23-year-old Boeing 767-400ER with the registration code N77066, and there were 231 people onboard, including 221 passengers and 10 crew.

At around 1:50PM local time, after a roughly 8hr30min flight, the aircraft was on a visual approach to Newark’s runway 29. It obviously approached too low, to the point that the plane hit both a light pole and a catering truck on the New Jersey Turnpike (I-95), just past the runway perimeter.

The point of impact was a little over 700 feet from the runway threshold. Prior to the landing, the tower advised the pilots that winds were 300 degrees at 15 knots, gusting to 31 knots, and visibility was good. So winds were on the gustier side, but not that far off from the runway heading, and not in a way that should’ve made this a particularly challenging landing.

One video is taken from inside a car, and doesn’t show a direct impact, but you can hear people cursing, obviously in disbelief at what they saw.

Another video is from inside the bakery truck that was hit by the wheel of the aircraft (the wheel reportedly crashed into the driver’s window). The video is rather graphic, but fortunately it sounds like the driver wasn’t seriously injured.

When the plane landed, pilots reported to air traffic control that they felt something when they landed near the runway threshold, and there was also confirmation that there was a hole in the side of the plane.

In a statement, the airline confirmed the incident, saying the plane landed safely and taxied to the gate under its own power, with no passengers or crew being injured. The carrier’s maintenance team is now evaluating damage to the aircraft, as well as investigating the cause.

It’s worth mentioning that United’s official statement only references that the plane “came into contact with a light pole,” and makes no mention of the truck that was hit.

The FAA is now investigating this United 767 incident

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is now investigating this incident, so let’s see what comes of this. There were no reports of any issues with the aircraft prior to the “contact,” so it sounds like the plane just ended up lower than it should’ve, for whatever reason.

Newark’s runway 29 is commonly used for landings, but it’s not terribly long, at 6,725 feet in length. That’s not problematically short, but it also means that pilots are trying to make sure they don’t land too far down the runway. Furthermore, with the New Jersey Turnpike right there, it makes for some dramatic approaches.

Just a few weeks ago, video footage was uploaded of a United Boeing 777-200ER making what looked like a dangerously low approach to the same runway, to the point that a person in the car was screaming.

Incidents like what we saw just shouldn’t happen. The Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) lights were operational during the landing, which should’ve given the pilots a clear indication that they were too low. Was this an unstable approach, or how did they mess this up so badly?

While United still has a great safety record in the scheme of things, the airline does seem to have more takeoff and landing incidents than American and Delta (at least in terms of those that are widely talked about), and it’s hard to know what to make of that.

A couple of years ago, the FAA even increased oversight of United, due to a series of incidents. However, the investigation ultimately didn’t reveal any major systematic issues.

Bottom line

On Sunday, a United Boeing 767 had an eventful approach to Newark Airport, when it struck a light pole and a truck on the New Jersey Turnpike. While Newark’s runway 29 is known for some low approaches, this is obviously a major issue, and should never happen. Fortunately no one onboard the aircraft was injured, and it still landed safely. Furthermore, the driver of the truck didn’t sustain serious injuries, which is a relief.

What do you make of this strange United 767 incident?

Conversations (90)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

KBC Guest

You forgot about the black or hispanic truck driver driving into the plane and the black or hispanic woman or man who installed the pole too high.

0
‼ 0
AeroB13a Guest

The game is on! The ‘Dunn’ is about to be well and truly done! Ben is sure to benefit from the clicks generated while I amuse myself running rings around an illiterate red neck Walter Mitty. You were given an opportunity to walk away with your head held high, but no …. You wanted this verbal intercourse Timmy darlink, now prepare to be well and truly stuffed!

0
‼ 0
Miles Guest

Do they really need to have light poles sticking up right at the threshold of a runway? Can't the cars use their headlights for 3 seconds there at night?

0
‼ 0
Capt Buck Lucky Guest

Runway 29 is extremely short for a heavy jet in my opinion. I have few types but no 767 experience. I have never landed anything bigger than an A320 on runway 29 EWR, it's doable, but tight. I have landed on runway 29 dozens of times in a regional jet and it still feels quite short, even in a small jet. Google quotes the minimum landing distance required in a B767 somewhere around 5500' feet. The published runway data for EWR shows a typical three degree glide path resulting in touchdown with 5541 on runway 11 EWR. Runway 29 has no ILS, so no glide path touchdown distance is published, but 29 is the inverse of 11 and 29 has a threshold that is displaced about 225 feet, meaning 225 shorter, so a normal touchdown following a normal three degree glide path approach, crossing the threshold at standard height of 60 feet means an aircraft would only have 5316' to stop. This is extremely uncomfortable for pilots, so they cheat low on the approach to get more runway for stopping. Often this is an unconscious reflex to the short runway sight picture. Cheat two inches too much or hit a sink pocket on short final and you take out a light pole on the I-95. Entirely predictable and understandable for an aircraft of this size landing on a runway this short. United should put a stop to this practice and if not perhaps the FAA should step in. Based on the winds there are rare days where 11/29 may be the only runway that is within limits for aircraft crosswind restrictions. This does pose a very serious operational dilemma for United. They are putting their heavy pilots in a tough spot expecting them to land on 29. Perhaps they should buy a certain JFK based airline and gain the operational flexibility to land heavies on JFK 31R or 31L on those rare days when winds are howling out of the northwest. 31L is 14,511' long and 31R is 10,000. Food for thought...

0
‼ 0
Pointing out Nonsense and Hypocrisy Guest

Nowhere in the article was DEI mentioned, but it was LEFT WING posters who immediately raised it. So the actual racists here are the Dems. Talk about irony. It's completely understandable that Dems think this way. After all, the KKK was founded by Democrats, they implemented Jim Crow laws, and they fought against passage of the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s. Thank goodness Lincoln emancipated the slaves and modern day Republicans got the Civil Rights Act passed. These are unfortunate facts for modern progressives, but they are indisputable facts. History remembers the truth.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published