Trump Ends Ban On Supersonic Flights Over United States Land

Trump Ends Ban On Supersonic Flights Over United States Land

38

Is supersonic commercial aviation one step closer to becoming a reality in the United States? Well, at least one major barrier standing in the way of it is being lifted…

United States paving way for supersonic commercial flight

On Friday, June 6, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order, instructing the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to end its ban on supersonic flight over United States land. Under current regulations, only military aircraft are allowed to exceed the sound barrier over land, and even then, there are restrictions on where it can be done.

Current regulations have been in place since 1973. The reasons for these restrictions are that sonic booms can be loud, and even capable of causing damage on the ground. So on the surface, seeing the reversal of a policy that has been around for over 50 years is pretty significant.

Here’s how the executive order describes the reason for the rule change:

“The United States stands at the threshold of a bold new chapter in aerospace innovation.  For more than 50 years, outdated and overly restrictive regulations have grounded the promise of supersonic flight over land, stifling American ingenuity, weakening our global competitiveness, and ceding leadership to foreign adversaries.  Advances in aerospace engineering, materials science, and noise reduction now make supersonic flight not just possible, but safe, sustainable, and commercially viable.  This order begins a historic national effort to reestablish the United States as the undisputed leader in high-speed aviation.  By updating obsolete standards and embracing the technologies of today and tomorrow, we will empower our engineers, entrepreneurs, and visionaries to deliver the next generation of air travel, which will be faster, quieter, safer, and more efficient than ever before.”

Trump’s executive order follows a bill pushed by Republican members of Congress in May 2025, which would’ve repealed the supersonic flight ban, as long as an audible sonic boom doesn’t reach the ground. That bill was justified based on the fact that the United States needs to compete with China, where Comac is developing the supersonic C949.

https://twitter.com/SecDuffy/status/1931121814484488487

Will we see supersonic commercial aviation, though?

In theory, I think it’s logical enough to lift the ban on supersonic flying over land, given how technology has improved. Assuming reasonable regulations stay in place and there’s no audible sonic boom on the ground, that seems sensible to me.

Here in the United States, we’re seeing aeronautics company Boom work on bringing back supersonic passenger air travel. The company’s main product is the Boom Overture, which is essentially intended to be the modern day Concorde.

It goes without saying that the company faces an uphill battle, as developing a completely new type of aircraft as an independent manufacturer is no small feat. Repealing the ban on supersonic travel over land is of course hugely positive for Boom, and is something the company needed to even have the slightest chance of success.

That being said, I’m still skeptical of the overall viability of this concept, on a variety of fronts. While the company clearly has a lot of smart people working there, the aircraft manufacturing business isn’t exactly an easy one.

First there’s the economics. Will the company be able to raise the many billions of dollars required to design this aircraft from scratch? Will Boom be able to price the plane attractively enough so that it makes sense for airlines? Will the operating costs make the plane commercially viable, and will the Boom Overture live up to the specs that have been promised (which have already been reduced significantly)?

Then there’s the actual logistical challenges of building an aircraft. How will Boom design an engine for this aircraft? How long will it take for this concept to be certified? The company has already achieved supersonic flight with a demonstrator aircraft, but obviously that’s not the same as building a jet big enough to accommodate dozens of passengers.

With supersonic travel being allowed over land, it also raises the question of whether there would be merit to coast-to-coast supersonic flights, or if the math just doesn’t add up there.

Fundamentally, the biggest issue with supersonic travel is that these planes would be in all-business class layouts. Airlines have a strong incentive not to pick up these kinds of planes, since they’d be cannibalizing their own premium demand on mainline jets. Like, we’re seeing airlines introduce bigger and bigger premium cabins, and adding all-business class jets to the mix won’t help with the economics of those planes.

Lifting the supersonic ban over land is great for Boom

Bottom line

The United States is ending its ban on supersonic commercial flight over land. This rule has been in place since 1973, so it’s a major development, and reflects that it’s now possible to operate supersonic flights without an audible sonic boom reaching the ground.

This is obviously great news for Boom, which is designing the Overture supersonic jet. I’m not sure it does much to alter the economics or appeal of the jet, but it at least keeps the concept in play, and makes it a littel more realistic.

What do you make of the US ending the ban on supersonic flights over land?

Conversations (38)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. traveldude New Member

    Boom Supersonic's valuation probably going Supersonic right now

  2. Lieflat19 Diamond

    Lucky is a Trump lover! Constantly reporting his eery move!

  3. FlyerDon Guest

    Anybody have an idea of how difficult it is for ATC to separate aircraft when one of them is going twice as fast as all the others? How about if a hundred are going that fast? Even if they can fly above FL500 they still need to get up there and then back down mixing with traffic flying half as fast. It’s going to take a much more sophisticated ATC system than we have now to handle a mix of traffic like that.

  4. KlimaBXsst Guest

    The hysterics about non-sonic booms due to Mach Cutoff, are perplexing to me. Wouldn’t our social heroes media heroes Tony Fauci, or Dr. Jill Biden encourage “trust the science?” It’s not as if Mach Cutoff is an imaginary phenomena, made up by Eastwick witches, or Salem warlocks, so thus please someone explain the hysterics.

  5. Hall Decker Guest

    "Sound Barrier" can be crossed without a boom ... seems like a prior life, I flew "in command of the rear seat" of an F-4 Blue Angel plane .."pilot flew out over the Gulf, told me he was going to 'goose the speed' ... then congratulated me for busting it. Something called the "mach cutoff", speed and height cause the 'boom' to fade out before it reaches the ground. I was a news reporter, Navy...

    "Sound Barrier" can be crossed without a boom ... seems like a prior life, I flew "in command of the rear seat" of an F-4 Blue Angel plane .."pilot flew out over the Gulf, told me he was going to 'goose the speed' ... then congratulated me for busting it. Something called the "mach cutoff", speed and height cause the 'boom' to fade out before it reaches the ground. I was a news reporter, Navy PR set up one 'orientation' flight for each annual event, to "demonstrate combat maneuvers."

  6. jojojo Guest

    this is another DUMB move by this orange king. so many lives will be harmed and then all the anxiety from living next to an airport and have to deal with loud booms. another illegal action that will kill americans

  7. Greg Guest

    Space X generated a known-in-advance sonic boom on re-entry landing just 25 miles off Oceanside and a path that flew over land.

    Shook hundreds of miles of populated coastal area, jostled attics and windows like a moderate earthquake.

    https://x.com/Dillonshrop06/status/1926392133155524817

    Not sure what loophole that used.

    1. Dusty Guest

      Probably a mix of "Who's going to stop me" and "Screw the rules, I have money".

  8. AeroB13a Guest

    How long will it be before all of the privately owned historic jets capable of Mach 1+ will be ‘banging’ around the American airspace?

    1. ImmortalSynn Guest

      Can you give an example of such "privately owned historic jets" that you think would be doing such at thing?

  9. Jeff Guest

    What's most stupid about this is that it is just an executive order (which is how he governs) -- that means that this order probably just lasts until January 2029, during which time we will have exactly zero commercial supersonic planes. So it's just a statement by him, not anything that has meaningful implications. In fact, given that it's nothing more than an executive order, no rational commercial actor is going to build planes based...

    What's most stupid about this is that it is just an executive order (which is how he governs) -- that means that this order probably just lasts until January 2029, during which time we will have exactly zero commercial supersonic planes. So it's just a statement by him, not anything that has meaningful implications. In fact, given that it's nothing more than an executive order, no rational commercial actor is going to build planes based on a business plan that requires flying across the continental US.

    1. ImmortalSynn Guest

      "What's most stupid about this is that it is just an executive order"

      Not entirely true.

      Both chambers of Congress have introduced legislation in order to codify this directive into permanent law, with the Senate version (SB1759) expected to be the baseline over the House's.

      https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/1759/amendments

    2. DiogenesTheCynic Member

      It is also not true that it is "just an executive order."

      The EO directs DOT to undertake rulemaking to remove the prohibition and establish a new noise standard. Those things cannot be undone in January 2029 -- they would take a further rulemaking process of a year or two, and the agency would have to justify why it is reinstating the prohibition after removing it very recently.

      Moreover, the current ban is...

      It is also not true that it is "just an executive order."

      The EO directs DOT to undertake rulemaking to remove the prohibition and establish a new noise standard. Those things cannot be undone in January 2029 -- they would take a further rulemaking process of a year or two, and the agency would have to justify why it is reinstating the prohibition after removing it very recently.

      Moreover, the current ban is itself regulation so yeah, the way you undo it is through regulation, which is what the executive order directs.

      Yes, without action from Congress, a future administration can undertake a process to undo this -- as they could with any regulatory action, like revising standards for drug approvals or emissions standards for power plants, which doesn't seem to mean those industries live in total uncertainty -- but anyone saying it's "just an executive order" does not know what they are talking about and should be ignored.

  10. Herb_Repozo Member

    “SuperSonic is back baby!”

    What an incredibly stupid thing to say. Job well done at ending a ban on something that no longer exists.

    Although, if this government is as effective at bringing back SST as they are at bringing back measles and other eradicated diseases, perhaps Boom will be a success!

    1. Nelson Diamond

      Don't hold your breath! Boom is maybe alone made for Airshows, just like the B777X. Supersonic Passengerflights is dead.

  11. Nelson Diamond

    Must be about the first decent thing he did in his life.
    Albeit, I don't believe Supersonic passenger flights will ever return and I'm sure I'm not alone.

    1. derek Guest

      Kamala wants to run again. She needs to take a stand if she supports this. Dr. Jill Biden was opposed to her selection after she viciously and falsely implied that Biden was a racist during a debate.

    2. Eskimo Guest

      You mean Kamala wants to lose again.

      It's not that Democrats are too dumb to realize that.
      They're just too dumb to realize repeating dumb strategies will still result the same.

  12. Northern Flyer Guest

    I was lucky enough to fly Concorde twice, once in each direction. Can’t think I will ever get the chance to fly supersonic commercially ever again.

    1. AeroB13a Guest

      Yes, I did the Rio-Paris in ‘82 after a stint in the South Atlantic.
      Hated the thing, couldn’t even stand up straight to urinate!
      I haven’t been on an AF aircraft since.
      However, I will try the New La Premiere suite out on the CDG-SIN route when it gets off the ground.
      No! I’m not taking the p***.

  13. Ivan X Guest

    I’m not following the logic of that there’s so much premium demand that premium cabins are getting bigger, but an all premium configured plane would cannibalize sales. If there’s sufficient demand, what’s economically problematic for an airline about more premium seats?

  14. Aaron Guest

    Maybe look into any financial, family, or any other type of links between President Taco and Boom?

    1. Big Al Guest

      TDS at it again. hahah so funny that you guys LOVE sitting in that space.

      cute

    2. Aaron Guest

      Not as much as you seem to love sitting in OTL space lol.

    3. Dusty Guest

      @Big Al
      What's telling is that MAGAts like you are so deep in the cult that you knee-jerk react to any criticism of Mango Mussolini with "TDS". Maybe think for yourself for once? Sorry, I know that's asking a lot.

    4. JDee Diamond

      Well, let's not forget how Republicans lost their shit when a "black man" was twice elected President

  15. Justin Dev Guest

    This is so stupid. No one who has ever been in the path of a sonic boom would think this is a good thing.

  16. GRkennedy Member

    "The reasons for these restrictions are that sonic booms can be loud, and even capable of causing damage on the ground."

    Yes and no. Another reason was that Concorde was a French-British plane, operated exclusively by Air France and British Airways.

    India had taken a similar measure which led Qantas to cancel its Concorde order.

    1. Justin Dev Guest

      @Grkennedy

      Sonic booms are more than just loud. They cause your body to vibrate, your house to shake... it is very disturbing. I experienced a sonic boom event in DC when they had to scramble F16s from AFB to intercept a light aircraft that was on a path to overfly the WH a year or two ago. They had to soon after explain via radio and tv what had occurred. It was darn unsettling and I do not want to go thru feeling the effects again.

    2. AeroB13a Guest

      People who live in ‘straw houses’ …. :-)

    3. Justin Dev Guest

      OY! Continue making stupid remarks. Perhaps you think doing so serves you well...

  17. Arps New Member

    excellent analysis, I would just add that Trump supporters are worse than morons, they are also depraved and immoral to the bone.

    1. AreoB13a Guest

      …. BOOM, BOOM …. Apes …. BOOM, BOOM ….

    2. Pete Guest

      If everyone ignored him, the comments would soon cease.

    3. Eskimo Guest

      That didn't work against Tim Dunn.

    4. AeroB13a Diamond

      Bro, have you not noticed that the likes of Tim, Apes, Aaron, etc, are simply clickbaiters for the likes of you and your clan ….

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Jeff Guest

What's most stupid about this is that it is just an executive order (which is how he governs) -- that means that this order probably just lasts until January 2029, during which time we will have exactly zero commercial supersonic planes. So it's just a statement by him, not anything that has meaningful implications. In fact, given that it's nothing more than an executive order, no rational commercial actor is going to build planes based on a business plan that requires flying across the continental US.

5
Aaron Guest

Maybe look into any financial, family, or any other type of links between President Taco and Boom?

3
Pete Guest

If everyone ignored him, the comments would soon cease.

2
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,527,136 Miles Traveled

39,914,500 Words Written

42,354 Posts Published