Transpacific Flight Diverts After Man Tries To Open Emergency Exit

A recent transpacific All Nippon Airways (ANA) flight was a bit more eventful than most passengers were probably hoping for, after a diversion became necessary…

Tokyo to Houston flight diverts to Seattle after chaos

This incident happened on Saturday, May 24, 2025, and involves ANA flight NH14, scheduled to operate from Tokyo (HND) to Houston (IAH). The 6,677-mile flight was operated by a Boeing 787-9 with the registration code JA934A, and typically takes somewhere around 11-12 hours.

The Pacific crossing was reportedly uneventful, with the excitement starting around nine hours into the flight, after the plane made landfall, flying over Washington and Idaho. At that point, a passenger reportedly jumped up and tried to open the emergency exit, without any sort of warning.

Fortunately there were two military veterans seated nearby, who dragged him away from the exit, and pinned him down, so that he was restrained. The crew and the two men then used zip ties to restrain the guy.

Of course the decision was made to divert, and the plane headed toward the nearest major international airport, which was Seattle Tacoma (SEA). The plane landed there around 45 minutes after the incident, at around 4:20AM.

ANA Boeing 787 diversion to Seattle
ANA Boeing 787 diversion to Seattle

At that point, police boarded the aircraft, and the man was removed from the plane. Video footage shows this interaction, and the officers acting calmly. While the man involved in the incident hasn’t been identified, airport officials said that the suspect had a “medical episode,” and he was transported to a nearby hospital.

Oddly, during the diversion, another passenger onboard also became unruly and started acting strange, and he was removed as well.

The plane ended up taking off from Seattle at 7:04AM, after a little over 2.5 hours on the ground, to continue its journey to Houston. The plane touched down there at 12:42PM, roughly four hours after its scheduled 8:45AM arrival.

The good news and bad news from this incident

The good news with incidents like this is that there’s limited direct risk from someone trying to open an emergency exit during a flight. That’s because an emergency exit door can’t be opened in the middle of the flight, due to the pressure difference between inside the cabin and outside.

An emergency exit could only realistically be opened at a lower altitude, when the pressurization difference isn’t as big, and at that point the plane is also flying slower, and the risk is lower. Of course it goes without saying that seeing something like this is terrifying, regardless of the direct risk.

The bad news is that we’re seeing people try to open emergency exits with an alarming frequency in recent times. I don’t know if I’d describe these as “copycat” incidents, or what, since it’s not like this is ever successful.

However, it’s sad how the concept of strong passengers having to jump into action and restraint others seems to be on the rise. We’re not worried about terrorism on an airliner in the traditional sense, but there is reason to be concerned with these constant mental health situations.

Bottom line

An ANA Boeing 787 flying from Tokyo to Houston diverted to Seattle, after a man tried to open the emergency exit door at altitude. Fortunately he was quickly restrained and zip tied, and then removed at the diversion point. While the direct risk of this is limited (due to the pressurization difference between the inside and outside of the cabin), it’s still terrifying that this is becoming a pretty common occurrence.

Conversations (21)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

STUDIO BLANC  Guest

Unbelievable story — it’s hard to imagine someone managing to open an emergency exit mid-flight. Huge credit to the crew for handling it safely. Aviation security is more critical than ever.

0
‼ 0
StuffedRaven New Member

Bingo! JA934A is technically owned and operated by Air Japan. Basically you can only get into ANA as cabin crew if you're newly graduated and young enough. If you come from another airline, gave birth, you're tier-two riff-raff and Air Japan is the organization that'll take you. Different contracts and presumably lower pay. Air Japan is also where you might see non-Japanese pilots. ANA's been doing this for years - Air Japan is a strategy where they reduce their cost base. From where I live, the HND flights are ANA mainline and NRT flights are operated by Air Japan. This cost-cutting was so successful intra-Asia that ANA now openly, brazenly does this on the most lucrative US flights like these. But I would question if there's a little difference in competence in things like language skills and IRROPS and incidents like these. The last time this happened where a white guy bit a flight attendant, was also on a flight operated by Air Japan. That's for you to consider; I am personally not giving ANA my business ;)

0
‼ 0
Justin Dev Guest

Well to be honest, 6 hours into any flight longer than 7 hours would drive anyone to wanting to get off...

0
‼ 0
docntx Guest

I am "in the business," and have repeated over and over that I have observed people who are obviously impaired, either due to mental illness or intoxicating substances, and everybody just kind of "looks the other way." An out of control person in an hermetically sealed metal tube at 35 000 feet. What could possibly go wrong? People are not entitled to be a danger to themselves or others. But, there is always the risk of a gate agent or flight attendant now having another pretext to go on a power trip.

0
‼ 0
Eskimo Guest

Why do you need to divert when the person is restrained? What is the threat that is not contained?

1
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published

Keep Exploring OMAAT