SWISS A220 Races To Avoid Zurich Curfew, Fails And Diverts

A Zurich-bound A220 diverted to Geneva last night. Should the pilots be commended for their optimism, or were they just unrealistic?

London to Zurich flight diverts to Geneva due to curfew

This incident happened on Monday, June 10, 2024, and involves SWISS flight LX339, scheduled to operate from London (LHR) to Zurich (ZRH). The flight was operated by a two-year-old Airbus A220-300 with the registration code YL-ABJ. This was actually an airBaltic jet operating on behalf of SWISS, as SWISS wet leases some of these planes (airBaltic has significant wet lease operations, given the impact that Russian airspace closure is having on the airline).

This flight was operated by an airBaltic A220

This 470-mile flight was blocked at 1hr40min, and was scheduled to depart at 8:05PM and arrive at 10:45PM (there’s an hour time change). Unfortunately the inbound aircraft from Zurich was running a bit over an hour late, so the aircraft only ended up taking off from Heathrow Airport at 9:22PM.

You might not think much of this, except for one important detail — Zurich Airport has a strict curfew of 11:30PM. 11PM is actually the latest scheduled arrival time, and then flights can land between 11PM and 11:30PM only if they’re delayed. So this SWISS flight goes up against that limit under normal circumstances, and is only scheduled to land 15 minutes prior to the latest scheduled landing time, and 45 minutes before the latest possible landing time.

The flight departed London, and made its way to Zurich for over 40 minutes. At 11:05PM Zurich time, the jet began its descent from 31,000 feet, in a race against the clock, given that it had to land within 25 minutes. It’s clear that the pilots were hauling you-know-what. They made good time, and were over the city of Basel (under 50 miles from Zurich) before 11:20PM.

However, at that point it became clear that based on the approach pattern and runway being used, they’d miss the curfew by a few minutes. As a result, the plane made a turn to the southwest and diverted to Geneva Airport (GVA), where the crew and passengers had to spend the night.

The SWISS flight that diverted to Geneva

This morning, the same aircraft ended up operating the short 143-mile flight from Geneva to Zurich as flight number LX5039. It departed at 9:49AM and landed at 10:20AM, just under 12 hours after the scheduled arrival time.

Under EU261 rules, passengers are at least entitled to having their expenses covered, plus cash compensation. That being said, we’re talking about SWISS, so odds are that the airline will blame the incident on Boeing 737 rudders, or something.

Were the pilots just overly optimistic, or…?

I can’t help but be curious about what went on in the background here:

  • When the plane got ready to push back from Heathrow, did the pilots maybe optimistically hope that they’d make the curfew?
  • Because these were airBaltic pilots, were they maybe less familiar with how strict the Zurich curfew is, than a SWISS pilot might have been?
  • Did SWISS and/or the pilots decide that it was still better to have the plane overnight at a SWISS hub, rather than at Heathrow?

I would speculate that the pilots probably thought that they’d be able to beat the Zurich curfew, and were just optimistic. I can also see the circumstances that could have caused this:

  • The jet started its pushback at Heathrow at 9:01PM, and then it took 21 minutes until the plane took off, which is a bit longer than usual; for example, the flights on the two prior days took 16 and 19 minutes from pushback to takeoff
  • While the flight time for this route varies, over the past couple of weeks it has ranged from 1hr9min to 1hr30min, and on average it takes somewhere around 1hr15min

So if the plane managed to take off within 16 minutes and then had a flight time of 1hr9min, it would’ve landed in Zurich with minutes to spare. I imagine that once the jet pushed back, the pilots were committed to giving it a shot. Unfortunately it didn’t work out quite as planned, though…

The crew may have been a bit overly optimistic

Bottom line

What was supposed to be a quick SWISS flight from London to Zurich last night ended up being an overnight journey due to the curfew at Zurich Airport. The jet departed behind schedule due to a late inbound aircraft. Once airborne, it became clear the plane wouldn’t make it to Zurich before 11:30PM, at which point the aircraft diverted to Geneva. Passengers ended up arriving in Zurich around 12 hours behind schedule.

What do you make of this SWISS curfew diversion?

Conversations (64)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Baz Guest

The last train from Geneva to Zürich is at 21:10. So clearly an overnight in Geneva would be necessary. It seems strange that they didn't choose Basel, where they could have landed in time for passengers to get the last train to Zürich, which would have been a minor inconvenience for passengers and saved the airline a lot of money in compensation.

0
‼ 0
Pierre Guest

That's definitely not a pilot decision... It's indeed the other way around, pilots raise concerns and company OCC decide if they have to go or not and where they have to divert... Pilots are responsible for safety not for scheduling the operation and its consequences... An airline is much more than 2 pilots in the front... There are several levels of management...

0
‼ 0
Jim Guest

I don't think pilots and airline professionals tell you how to do your job. Not sure why you think you're qualified to do the same.

0
‼ 0
Patrick Guest

Hi Ben. 1. UK 261 applies to flights departing or arriving from or to the UK, (essentially identical to EU 261 compensation). 2. How do you find the pushback time for a flight. if not onboard? Flight radar gives the wheels up time. Thanks. Patrick

0
‼ 0
N1120A Guest

Hard curfews are ridiculous, especially for arrivals.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published