Is Southwest Airlines Planning International Expansion, Or…?

Southwest Airlines has just made an interesting regulatory request, which is causing some people to wonder whether the airline is planning a significant international expansion. However, there’s likely a boring explanation.

Southwest requests approval for international expansion

@IshrionA flags how Southwest has just filed with the Department of Transportation (DOT), requesting permission to operate service to any country that is part of the Open Skies agreement with the United States. This includes many countries in Europe, Latin America, Asia, Africa, etc.

In other words, pending airport slots and availability, this would allow Southwest to massively expand internationally, without needing to request regulatory approval for each new route.

What’s actually going on here? Is Southwest getting ready to plan a big international expansion? Currently, the airline operates domestically, and also flies to select destinations to Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean.

The answer is likely pretty unsexy. We know that Southwest is starting to partner with international airlines, with the first partnership being with Icelandair. To start, this is an interline agreement, but one certainly assumes that the airline eventually hopes to launch codeshare agreements.

If Southwest wants to codeshare with foreign airlines, it needs this authority to do so, so of course it’s logical that the airline is finally filing for this. It’s easy authority to get, and even beyond that, there’s no downside. So is it possible that Southwest plans some major international expansion at some point in the future? Sure. But I wouldn’t view this announcement as being indicative of that, as this is something that needed to be done anyway.

There’s likely an innocent explanation for this request

Could we see Southwest expand internationally, though?

As mentioned above, I don’t think this regulatory filing is indicative of Southwest expanding internationally, but rather it’s about the carrier’s new strategy of partnering with international airlines. Furthermore, it’s useful to have this flexibility anyway, if the airline does decide it wants to expand internationally in the future.

That being said, Southwest is seemingly changing everything about its business model at the moment, so could we also see the airline increasingly pursue international flying opportunities? Admittedly Southwest is kind of growth constrained at the moment, given the number of 737 MAX delivery delays we’re seeing.

Personally, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Southwest increasingly pursue more international flying within the Americas, where it’s to more destinations in the Caribbean, or to Northern South America. It’s not a great time to add service to Canada, but maybe that could happen in the future as well (though that comes with so many challenges, given the operating cost disadvantage, plus high airport and government taxes and fees).

We can’t rule out that Southwest may eventually operate some sort of flights to Europe, given that Breeze claims it wants to do that with A220s. But I just think the opportunities there aren’t amazing:

  • Southwest would be really limited in terms of the markets in which it can operate, using Boeing 737 MAXs; the Northeast to Dublin might work, but not much more than that
  • I just don’t see much upside, since economy fares across the Atlantic are cheap for most of the year, and Southwest can’t tap into premium demand

But heck, with the pace at which Southwest is changing right now, who knows, maybe the airline will be flying all-business class 777Xs a decade down the road…

Not the sexiest plane for long haul flying!

Bottom line

Southwest has requested blanket authority to take advantage of the Open Skies agreement that the United States has. This will allow the airline to expand internationally. However, don’t expect anything too exciting. The most likely explanation is that this is just being requested in anticipation of codesharing with foreign airlines.

What do you make of this Southwest regulatory request?

Conversations (17)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Samus Aran Guest

Southwest's privacy policy, updated this year, mentions EU and UK privacy laws. Perhaps this might hint at where they plan to expand internationally?

0
‼ 0
WestCoastFlyer Guest

The WN expansion to MEX was a disaster. Big problems with their distribution, no presence in travel agencies, inability to accept Mexican issued credit cards. WN does not need a repeat of Mexico City. WN should stay focused on their amazing destinations like Midland and Brownsville which is the core of the airline.

0
‼ 0
Ruaty Nail Guest

Canada (Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto and Montreal) would be at the top of my wish list.

0
‼ 0
Brian W Guest

They seem to be copying Frontier and maybe JetBlue serving place abit further out than just the Caribean and Central America. Still waiting for Southwest to serve Toronto and Vancouver.

0
‼ 0
Exit Row Seat Guest

As mentioned, WN is in a bit of a bind while it looks to expand its footprint. Its foray into Hawaii has been a mixed bag. And the MAX had limited range compared to a A321NEO or LR. Therefore, a WN hop across the Pond is highly unlikely. Even JetBlue is experiencing some remorse with its Euro footprint. As for direct Latin America service, it is somewhat limited due to service already provide by DL, AA, UA, & B6. The application is more likely to pad its bets to support foreign carriers by providing domestic carry forward service.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published