Southwest Airlines Ends Chicago O’Hare Flights, And That’s Not Surprising

Southwest Airlines is pulling out of one of the United States’ busiest airport, and if anything, I’m surprised the airline tried to fly there in the first place.

Southwest pulling out of Chicago O’Hare as of June 2026

As of June 4, 2026, Southwest intends to discontinue flights to Chicago O’Hare Airport (ORD), as the airline will instead focus on Chicago Midway Airport (MDW). The airline states that this decision was made as part of an ongoing effort to refine its network, and that “operating at Chicago O’Hare continues to be challenging, and we are confident we can serve Chicagoland through Chicago Midway.”

I suspect the reference to “challenging” refers to the profitability of routes from the airport, rather than challenges as a result of overcrowding at the airport. With American and United battling it out at O’Hare, the FAA has now ordered flight cuts there.

Southwest currently serves around a dozen destinations out of O’Hare, including flights to several hubs and focus cities, like Austin (AUS), Dallas, (DAL), Denver (DEN), Las Vegas (LAS), and Phoenix (PHX), as well as some other point-to-point routes, like to Fort Myers (RSW).

Southwest will pull out of Chicago O’Hare Airport

It’s logical for Southwest to focus on Chicago Midway

The Dallas-based carrier’s history with serving Chicago O’Hare is interesting. Shortly after the start of the pandemic, all airlines looked for new flying opportunities, given how travel demand evolved. Historically, Southwest served Chicago via Midway Airport, but as of 2021, the airline decided to try serving O’Hare Airport as well.

This strategy of serving the major airports where the airline doesn’t have a presence hasn’t really worked out. For example, at the same time Southwest also started service to Houston Intercontinental Airport (IAH), complementing service to Houston Hobby Airport (HOU), but the Intercontinental Airport service was pulled in 2024.

As I see it, Southwest launched flights to Chicago O’Hare (and for that matter, Houston Intercontinental) as a bit of a test, at a transitionary time for the airline. Could Southwest tap into a new customer base by flying out of these major international airports, rather than Southwest’s smaller fortress hubs? Or would Southwest’s existing customer base value the flexibility offered?

Personally the strategy didn’t make much sense to me. Southwest was never going to be able to compete with American or United at O’Hare, in terms of schedule or loyalty. The only way the airline could compete would be on price, and Southwest isn’t in the business of trying to undercut the competition on pricing, as it’s not an ultra low cost carrier.

I also think it’s worth considering that within the past couple of years, we’ve seen Southwest start to allow flights to be booked through online travel agencies. I think that’s also an interesting angle to consider. By flying to the smaller airports, the airline may have sometimes been excluded from search results, based on the patterns with which people research flights.

When you go to Google Flights and search for a flight from “MIA” to “ORD,” you wouldn’t see options to MDW. Has Southwest maybe been trying to see how actually adding flights to the major airports impacts booking patterns? Either way, I would’ve been more surprised if this were a success, and if flying to these airports was the best use of resources (aircraft).

There’s value in focusing on fortress hubs

Bottom line

As of June 2026, Southwest Airlines will discontinue flights to Chicago O’Hare Airport, roughly five years after launching service there. Operating a fairly small network out of O’Hare when you have a massive hub at Midway doesn’t seem terribly logical to me, especially when it’s a hub for two airlines. This move follows a similar situation in Houston a while back. The moral of the story is that airlines love their fortress hubs.

What do you make of Southwest cutting O’Hare flights?

Conversations (25)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Jason Guest

With the acknowledgement that I frequently flew out of MDW as a kid growing up (I even flew out of CGX; anyone remember CGX?), I have rarely understood the recent changes in Southwest... Ben is quite right when he writes that WN is not an ULCC, but without any international airline partners or membership in one of the three major alliances, WN is far better off (IMHO) by lowering their expenses and flying out of airports like DAL, MDW, HOU, LGA, OAK and similar, so-called "secondary" airports in and around major metropolitan areas. The only exceptions I can think of off the top of my head are LAX (due to the overall geographic sprawl of Los Angeles) and SEA (because PAE is can't handle the traffic, and it's simply too far away from anyone living south of SEA).

0
‼ 0
nocomments Guest

"View all comments" is not loading properly...

1
‼ 0
Mark Guest

Lately the comments section (other than the three featured comments) won’t display, so sorry if this has been already mention… but what about IAD? They’re pulling out of there too. Similar circumstances, with an established hub carrier and larger operation in the same area.

3
‼ 0
Jacob Guest

On the flip side, the strategy of increasing flights at the main airport does seem to be working for them in the Bay Area. OAK is a Southwest fortress hub, and they're also the leading carrier at SJC, but historically they haven't had a huge presence at SFO. They've been slowly increasing their SFO presence and shifting some routes from OAK to SFO (such as BWI and BNA), and so far that seems to be going well for WN (and arguably caused AS to begin to retrench).

1
‼ 0
FGCUFlyer Guest

Growing up in the north Chicago suburbs, MKE was 45 minutes north and ORD was 30 minutes south. My family would drive the extra 15 minutes when we needed the extra luggage by flying Southwest (when that was the differentiating factor). Many articles describe WN’s departure from ORD as confirmation that the airline is abandoning the North / Northwest suburbs population; however, many fail to realize its proximity to MKE. ORD was starting to cannibalize both MDW and MKE in a lot of leisure markets. It’s disappointing, but not the end of the world all things considered. Unpopular opinion, but it seems like it had to be done.

2
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published