Southwest Adds Airline Partnerships, Starting With Icelandair

Southwest Adds Airline Partnerships, Starting With Icelandair

9

Southwest Airlines is currently undergoing a major transformation, as the airline looks to improve its financial performance. This includes introducing assigned & premium seating, adding redeye flights to the schedule, and more.

In September 2024, the airline announced plans to introduce airline partnerships, which represents a major shift from the carrier’s old way of doing business. There’s now an update, as the first airline partnership has just been launched.

Southwest & Icelandair launch interline partnership

Southwest Airlines plans to progressively introduce new airline partnerships, with the first one now being live. This is intended to connect customers with more global destinations, and to generate additional demand for travel across the Southwest network.

Icelandair is Southwest’s first airline partner, and the partnership has just gone live. Southwest is really starting slow, as initially this is an interline agreement between the two airlines:

  • The partnership has launched as of mid-February 2025, initially covering flights through Baltimore (BWI)
  • The next gateways for this partnership are expected to be Denver (DEN) and Nashville (BNA), though there’s no exact date for that launch yet
  • Initially, it’s just possible to book tickets as part of this agreement through Icelandair’s website, and not through Southwest’s website
  • Once Southwest introduces assigned seating, it’ll also be possible to book itineraries including travel on both airlines through Southwest (currently Southwest lacks the technology)
  • Eventually there should be frequent flyer reciprocity, allowing Rapid Rewards members to earn and redeem points, but there’s no timeline for that yet

Just as an example of this partnership now being live, I just went to Icelandair’s website, searching an itinerary from Tampa to Keflavik. There are several connecting options, with one of those being through Baltimore, with the first segment on Southwest.

The Icelandair & Southwest partnership in action

As you can see, this is a very basic level of cooperation. An interline agreement just allows tickets to easily be booked across two airlines. We’re not even talking about a codeshare agreement, or anything like that. But still, it’s major progress for Southwest, which has historically not done much in the way of partnerships.

Southwest is expected to introduce at least one other airline partnership within the next year, though details about that aren’t yet known. To state the obvious, I think it’s a sure bet that Southwest won’t be trying to join one of the global alliances, and won’t be partnering with any major US airline. Clearly this is just about generating additional demand at long haul gateways.

I’d imagine that Southwest may take a similar approach to Alaska Airlines, before it joined oneworld. The carrier partnered with all kinds of long haul airlines offering service to the West Coast, so maybe Southwest can do something similar for airports on the East Coast. It seems that airlines like Condor would be a good fit, though they have limited airports where they overlap.

Southwest is a massive airline, but up until this point, hasn’t offered any airline partnerships, so this is a pretty major development. Interestingly, around two years ago, Southwest had a job posting for the position of “Senior Manager Airline Partnerships.” So it’s clear that this is something that Southwest has been working toward for some time.

Here’s how Icelandair Chief Commercial Officer Tómas Ingason describes this:

“We are very excited to have formalized our partnership with Southwest and honored to be chosen as Southwest’s first airline partner. The partnership will open new and exciting connections for our customers onwards with Southwest to numerous destinations in North America, and at the same time, their customers will benefit from our extensive connections to Iceland and Europe. We welcome Southwest to our strong partnership portfolio in the US and ever-growing group of partner airlines and look forward to working together in offering our customers smooth and enjoyable travel experiences.”

Meanwhile here’s how Southwest EVP and Chief Transformation officer Ryan Green describes this:

“It’s fitting for us to launch this chapter of industry-standard airline partnerships with our longtime friends, Icelandair. Beyond an ability to offer each other’s Customers access to new destinations and like-minded travel experiences centered around hospitality and value, we’re grateful to have been guided by their expertise and best practices in building our program.”

Icelandair is Southwest’s first partner

This isn’t going to be some goldmine for Southwest

I suppose it makes sense for Southwest to partner with some global airlines, but I don’t think this will materially change the carrier’s financials for the better. There are two major issues here.

The first issue is that this kind of traffic generally isn’t very high yield, based on how revenue is split. I mean, a transatlantic Icelandair economy ticket might cost $500, and Southwest would be getting a small percentage of that revenue.

The way these agreements are structured differs, but the airline might be getting revenue based on the percentage of the total trip distance it carries a passenger. You can bet that these tickets connecting to global partners won’t have the same revenue per segment as if Southwest sold the seats directly. But it’s a way to sell seats, and an occupied seat is better than an empty seat, especially since Southwest is unlikely to cannibalize its own business this way.

The other general challenge here is that Southwest’s fare types just aren’t very compatible with those of other airlines. For example, Southwest includes two free checked bags on all fares (and this policy will continue), which is a way more generous policy than with most other airlines.

So I’m curious how this will work in the context of these partnerships, when Southwest passengers are connecting to an airline that doesn’t allow any free checked bags, or maybe allows one free checked bag, on a particular fare.

I don’t see this being all that profitable for Southwest

Bottom line

Southwest Airlines is launching airline partnerships as of this year. Icelandair is Southwest’s first airline partner, and that partnership has just kicked off for connections in Baltimore (BWI), with Denver (DEN) and Nashville (BNA) expected to follow soon.

Ultimately it makes sense for Southwest to find more ways to fill seats, though this isn’t likely to be some cash cow for the airline, especially when you consider that Southwest tends to command more revenue per seat mile than most other carriers with these kinds of arrangements (given all that’s included with Southwest fares).

What do you make of Southwest launching airline partnerships?

Conversations (9)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Exit Row Seat Guest

    For those originating from North America, I don't see much of an advantage. Most American are not familiar with FI unless they are from the east coast. Also, to make a second connection (Reykjavík) on your way to the Euro Continent is a bit exhausting. I've experienced FI and I wasn't too impressed.
    For those from the Continent, FI attracts the ULCC (ie: flip flop and backpack) group. They might be interested in the...

    For those originating from North America, I don't see much of an advantage. Most American are not familiar with FI unless they are from the east coast. Also, to make a second connection (Reykjavík) on your way to the Euro Continent is a bit exhausting. I've experienced FI and I wasn't too impressed.
    For those from the Continent, FI attracts the ULCC (ie: flip flop and backpack) group. They might be interested in the thru service to the American heartland, but will be surprised when blocked by "reserved seats" in an open seating arrangement. They'll have fun wrapping their head around that one!!
    I don't think the US legacy carriers have much to worry about.

  2. DCAWABN Guest

    While it's unlikely to be a deterrent for most, if I'm booking Saga Class to/from KEF then being herded onto a WN plane for my onward connection, I'm going to be less than thrilled. Granted this is similar to being crammed into European Business on literally all but TK. But I don't recall WN stating that their new seating structure will have open middle seats by design as part of a business class-like offering. All...

    While it's unlikely to be a deterrent for most, if I'm booking Saga Class to/from KEF then being herded onto a WN plane for my onward connection, I'm going to be less than thrilled. Granted this is similar to being crammed into European Business on literally all but TK. But I don't recall WN stating that their new seating structure will have open middle seats by design as part of a business class-like offering. All of this just fills so niche. Like the two showed up dateless to Airline Prom and were like, "I don't have a date. YOU don't have a date. Fuck it...wanna dance?" with nothing really in common and no previous compatibility.

    1. STEFFL Diamond

      Seems like, you have never really flown Intra European Business Class much lately ?
      ITA, offers lie flat seats on some routes.
      Even tho, in Europe it’s still called Business Class vs. US carried love there “FIRST” Class without even any leg-rest or anything that reminds anybody on a 2+ hour flight of anything that’s “FIRST”, not even the plastic cup of water offered before take off!
      Things are shifting and just...

      Seems like, you have never really flown Intra European Business Class much lately ?
      ITA, offers lie flat seats on some routes.
      Even tho, in Europe it’s still called Business Class vs. US carried love there “FIRST” Class without even any leg-rest or anything that reminds anybody on a 2+ hour flight of anything that’s “FIRST”, not even the plastic cup of water offered before take off!
      Things are shifting and just because LH-Group, AF/KL or BA-Group does not offer Business Class as TK does, things are shifting slowly! Just to let you know.
      It’s all a thing of planning! To get the most for your $.

  3. STEFFL Diamond

    CONDOR-SOUTHWEST … no good match!
    :-(
    1. DE already partners with AS
    2. DE serves just 5 airports that would fit for WN connections, BUT interfere with AS partner flights.
    3. i guess AS much more important to DE (even if AS sucks in customer satisfaction of background booking ability and FQTV service) but the route map of both airlines is just a much better fit.
    REALLY SAD THING, both...

    CONDOR-SOUTHWEST … no good match!
    :-(
    1. DE already partners with AS
    2. DE serves just 5 airports that would fit for WN connections, BUT interfere with AS partner flights.
    3. i guess AS much more important to DE (even if AS sucks in customer satisfaction of background booking ability and FQTV service) but the route map of both airlines is just a much better fit.
    REALLY SAD THING, both US airlines fly planes, that most Europeans would try to avoid (737-MAX) and compared to US travelers, those who care about a save plane in the sky, avoid such airlines!
    Luckily, there is other options.
    CONDOR just got rid of all overaged BOEING planes, for a lot of good reasons.

    1. ImmortalSynn Guest

      "both US airlines fly planes, that most Europeans would try to avoid"

      Right, which is why Ryanair is the largest airline by passenger count within Europe (737-MAX).

      Swing-and-a-miss there, bud.

    2. STEFFL Diamond

      @ImmortalSynn:
      Ryanair is mostly relying on low income and NON frequent flyers!
      I do NOT consider these passengers most Europeans!
      This forum here is mostly frequent traveler people, therefore Ryanair or even TUIfly and sorts of 1 time a year flyers usually just watch the price, vacation package or availability on 1-2 flights a week schedule, BUT not an aircraft type!
      Easy to make out, what a typical frequent flyers would...

      @ImmortalSynn:
      Ryanair is mostly relying on low income and NON frequent flyers!
      I do NOT consider these passengers most Europeans!
      This forum here is mostly frequent traveler people, therefore Ryanair or even TUIfly and sorts of 1 time a year flyers usually just watch the price, vacation package or availability on 1-2 flights a week schedule, BUT not an aircraft type!
      Easy to make out, what a typical frequent flyers would look at, other then the price!
      In my case, if i have a choice, i DO deselect like many others too, certain aircraft and also try to avoid a certain aircraft manufacturer.
      It all has it’s reason(s).

    3. STEFFL Diamond

      If you (and maybe some others here too) got the time … watch this:
      VERY informative and educating on how some NOT SO COOL things are tried to NOT being to much being put in public.
      BUT, the danger to it is evident!
      https://youtu.be/swlVkYVSlIE?si=r3ncbuX7SBBXfEI2

      just watch, on your next 737-MAX flight. ;-)
      ….. Coming from a 737 check pilot and long time airline employee!

  4. stogieguy7 Diamond

    Using your example of TPA-KEF, this doesn't look very compelling. This is an airline that markets itself as being a price leader, while not being a ULCC. Yes, the stopover at KEP is inconvenient, but hey we'll make it painless, smooth, and at a price that's worth it. You can even stop over for a visit if you'd like. Sounds great.

    But.....that itinerary shows pricing that's not great and a very long trip on...

    Using your example of TPA-KEF, this doesn't look very compelling. This is an airline that markets itself as being a price leader, while not being a ULCC. Yes, the stopover at KEP is inconvenient, but hey we'll make it painless, smooth, and at a price that's worth it. You can even stop over for a visit if you'd like. Sounds great.

    But.....that itinerary shows pricing that's not great and a very long trip on a narrowbody. Sure, if you're going to KEP it works. But, Icelandair is mainly used as a one stop to Europe. Would you do that from TPA? I sure wouldn't. 3 stops and a fare no better than a nonstop or 1-stop straight to the continent. Tough sell.

  5. AeroB13a Guest

    Ben, have you forgotten the partnership with Yorkshire Airways too?

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6VLYpKGVBUg

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Exit Row Seat Guest

For those originating from North America, I don't see much of an advantage. Most American are not familiar with FI unless they are from the east coast. Also, to make a second connection (Reykjavík) on your way to the Euro Continent is a bit exhausting. I've experienced FI and I wasn't too impressed. For those from the Continent, FI attracts the ULCC (ie: flip flop and backpack) group. They might be interested in the thru service to the American heartland, but will be surprised when blocked by "reserved seats" in an open seating arrangement. They'll have fun wrapping their head around that one!! I don't think the US legacy carriers have much to worry about.

1
stogieguy7 Diamond

Using your example of TPA-KEF, this doesn't look very compelling. This is an airline that markets itself as being a price leader, while not being a ULCC. Yes, the stopover at KEP is inconvenient, but hey we'll make it painless, smooth, and at a price that's worth it. You can even stop over for a visit if you'd like. Sounds great. But.....that itinerary shows pricing that's not great and a very long trip on a narrowbody. Sure, if you're going to KEP it works. But, Icelandair is mainly used as a one stop to Europe. Would you do that from TPA? I sure wouldn't. 3 stops and a fare no better than a nonstop or 1-stop straight to the continent. Tough sell.

1
STEFFL Diamond

Seems like, you have never really flown Intra European Business Class much lately ? ITA, offers lie flat seats on some routes. Even tho, in Europe it’s still called Business Class vs. US carried love there “FIRST” Class without even any leg-rest or anything that reminds anybody on a 2+ hour flight of anything that’s “FIRST”, not even the plastic cup of water offered before take off! Things are shifting and just because LH-Group, AF/KL or BA-Group does not offer Business Class as TK does, things are shifting slowly! Just to let you know. It’s all a thing of planning! To get the most for your $.

0
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,527,136 Miles Traveled

39,914,500 Words Written

42,354 Posts Published