Owner Of San Francisco’s Biggest Hotel Stops Debt Payments

In the past couple of years we’ve seen a strong recovery in leisure travel demand. Unfortunately not all cities have benefited equally from that, with San Francisco probably being the major US city in the toughest spot. Here’s the clearest example of that…

Park Hotels & Resorts stops paying loan for San Francisco hotels

Park Hotels & Resorts is a Virginia-based investment firm that owns roughly 50 hotels. In San Francisco, the company owns the 1,921-room Hilton San Francisco Union Square (the biggest hotel in the city) and the 1,024-room Parc 55 San Francisco (the fourth biggest hotel in the city). Together, the two hotels have roughly 9% of San Francisco’s hotel room inventory.

The company has announced that as of June 2023, it has ceased making payments toward a $725 million loan that’s scheduled to mature in November 2023, which is secured by these two properties. The company intends to work in good faith with loan officers to determine the most effective path forward, which is expected to result in the removal of these hotels from its portfolio.

The hotels continue to remain open. The properties will probably be sold at a huge discount, and may continue to operate as their existing brands in the future. Only time will tell.

As Park Hotels & Resorts CEO Thomas Baltimore describes this decision:

“This past week we made the very difficult, but necessary decision to stop debt service payments on our San Francisco CMBS loan. After much thought and consideration, we believe it is in the best interest for Park’s stockholders to materially reduce our current exposure to the San Francisco market. Now more than ever, we believe San Francisco’s path to recovery remains clouded and elongated by major challenges – both old and new: record high office vacancy; concerns over street conditions; lower return to office than peer cities; and a weaker than expected citywide convention calendar through 2027 that will negatively impact business and leisure demand and will likely significantly reduce compression in the city for the foreseeable future. Unfortunately, the continued burden on our operating results and balance sheet is too significant to warrant continuing to subsidize and own these assets.”

What’s wild is that in 2016, these two hotels were valued at $1.6 billion, while now the company is walking away from these hotels over a $725 million loan, which is less than half of that.

The San Francisco Standard reports that in 2019, the two properties had revenue of $175.4 million and $95 million, while in 2022, those figures fell to under $30 million each.

Park Hotels & Resorts sold off the Le Meridien San Francisco and Hotel Adagio San Francisco in 2021. The company continues to own the JW Marriott Union Square and Hyatt Centric Fisherman’s Wharf, but hasn’t yet walked away from those properties.

Hilton Union Square San Francisco

San Francisco hotels are in a tough spot

I have to imagine that these won’t be the last hotels that investors walk away from in San Francisco. On the most basic level, San Francisco has long been the place for tech people to be, and the pricing for everything reflected that. Add in that the city was popular with conventions, and it was a very lucrative market for hotel owners.

Unfortunately for San Francisco, a lot has changed. With more people working from home, some companies having left the Bay Area, business travel being way down, and convention traffic nowhere near where it was pre-pandemic, the demand for hotels in San Francisco continues to be greatly depressed, with no signs of that changing.

For hotel owners, that presents a real challenge. They can’t charge the rates they used to charge, and even with lower rates, occupancy is way down. Many hotel investors seemingly thought that prices in San Francisco would only keep going up, and many bought at the height of the market. I imagine we’ll see a lot more hotel investors offload their assets in San Francisco.

The precedent being set here by Park Hotels & Resorts certainly won’t help with that either, when it comes to the general valuation of hotel real estate in the city.

Hilton Union Square San Francisco

Bottom line

The owner of San Francisco’s largest and fourth largest hotel has stopped making loan payments, as the company doesn’t see a path to recovery for the hotel industry in the Bay Area. Even though the two hotels were valued at $1.6 billion seven years ago, the owner is now turning over the keys to the properties over a $725 million loan.

At a time when it seems like we’re seeing record occupancy and rates in so many hotel markets, it’s important to keep in mind that’s not the case across the board.

What do you make of the owner walking away from two of San Francisco’s biggest hotels?

Conversations (52)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

dwondermeant Guest

@ ll5777779 Its sad what SF has become one of our nations greatest cities caught in a era I never saw coming just 6 or 7 years ago.And joy can still be had with a single visit and some great dining experiences and local scenery/views I remember when it was my dream to live there many decades ago Agree with much of you post except for the St Regis being a great points hotel or even being a great luxury hotel.Yes superior to anything in Fisherman's Wharf I suppose and some of the Downtown convention hotels. Their overpricing on point award rooms and revenue rates (likely much to do with the Bonvoy effect to be sure)are a rip off on a dated over hyped over rated property.The breakfast was crap (limited to one experience being truthful.Never coming back) The service near non existent and slow though well meaning.We walked out and happily went elsewhere.Luxury hotels need to be near defect free. I cant speak for dinner or lunch but out of season fruit and over cooked eggs at sky high prices is sad.The Hyatt's at the airport can cook better.Including the Hyatt Centric in F/Wharf and def a mediocre hotel! The former GM of the St Regis was a world class hospitality professional and class act. They do have some good front of house folks.You won't have to battle with me for an upgrade to a suite at the property as a lifetime Titanium Bonvoy member I will be at 10 other hotels happily.That said not trying to be mean spirited as we all have our different view points and if its something you personally get pleasure from as well as find value its all good.I do appreciate your kind words on San Francisco which will always have a place in my heart.

0
‼ 0
Bob Guest

There is no foot traffic anymore in downtown sf. Until companies enforce return to the office downtown will die. Considering the number of IT folks who can function at 90% remote they have no incentive to return to the office. Of course you also have plenty of non IT essential who enjoys afternoon naps who refuses to return to the office. Right now homeless, crazies and people looking to casually walk into Westfield mall and take whatever they want makes up a large population of downtown. I wouldn't go there if I can help it.

0
‼ 0
iamhere Guest

One of the big issues is that SF's economy is largely based on tourism which has not been happening to the extent that it was. Also, real estate is down these days compared to what it once was and the price they will exit at is because it is basically distressed and that the demand for the purchase is not there. When you really need the cash you will have to reduce the price.

0
‼ 0
Timo Diamond

I lied in SF for almost 8 years. I worked in a fancy office in the Financial District. I lived on the border of respectability between Upper Tenderloin & Lower Nob Hill, ha ha... that's what we told our delusional 30 yr old selves at the time in the mid-90s. Then moved to Hayes Valley long before its gentrification. I visit there about once a year but after my visit a year ago I'm done. It's a hollow dump. The depressing cold summer fog & rampant mental illness/drug addicts of the street bums makes for a rough night out. The retarded political class of SF must be run out on a railcar to right that sinking ship but the dumb citizens just can't stop voting for them. It will take decades to return to normalcy & sanity.

1
‼ 0
BradStPete Diamond

I moved to SF in 1979, before some of you were born...LOL The CITY (as we called it) was actually dressy, elegant and clean filled with nice people. I re-located to Florida in 1994. Irrelevant, I know, but my once elegant city is long gone. I have no desire to ever return. And FYI, I am a very liberal, proudly woke person. SF, you break my heart

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published