Terrifying: Southwest 737 Descends To 150 Feet Above Tampa Bay

Southwest Airlines can’t seem to stay out of the news lately when it comes to concerning safety incidents. A couple of days ago I first wrote about yet another near catastrophe, which might just be the scariest one we’ve seen so far. I wanted to provide an update, as I just saw an interesting analysis of what may have caused this, and it’s kind of shocking.

Southwest 737 MAX has near disaster on approach to Tampa

This incident happened on Sunday, July 14, 2024, and involves Southwest Airlines flight WN425, scheduled to fly from Columbus (CMH) to Tampa (TPA). The flight was operated by a less than one-year-old Boeing 737 MAX 8 with the registration code N8841L.

The flight was scheduled to depart at 4PM and arrive at 6:10PM. The plane took off roughly on schedule, at 4:15PM, and most of the flight was routine, though it took a bit longer than usual due to weather enroute, as the plane made several detours.

On top of that, weather conditions in Tampa weren’t great that day, with rain and strong gusts, so it was a tricky approach.

Around 2hr50min after departure, the plane was on approach to runway 10 at Tampa Airport (it’s worth noting that this runway is rarely used by commercial aircraft, but in this case it was the best runway due to the weather conditions). As the plane was coming in over Tampa Bay, while around four miles from the runway, it descended as low as 150 feet, according to ADS-B data.

Where the Southwest 737 reached its lowest point

Let’s not mince words here — that’s terrifying, and seconds from disaster. For context, that altitude is just a bit more than the 737’s wingspan. That also doesn’t factor in that the plane was coming in right over the Courtney Campbell Causeway, which is elevated above the water.

Worst of all, the pilots didn’t even seem to realize what was going on. Instead, they only increased altitude again after an air traffic controller warned them about a low altitude alert. Here’s how that interaction went at first:

ATC: “Southwest 425, low altitude alert, check your altitude. Tampa’s altimeter is 30.14.”
Pilot: “30.14, thank you, Southwest 425.”

The pilots sure sound calm, for better or worse. The Southwest plane then started to slowly gain altitude again. Then the conversation continued as follows:

ATC: “Southwest 425, you plan to go around?”
Pilot: “Yeah, we are, we have to go, Southwest 425.”
ATC: “Southwest 425, roger, cancel approach clearance, go around runway 10. For now you can fly runway heading and climb and maintain 1,600.”

After this incident, the jet ended up diverting to Fort Lauderdale (FLL), where the weather was better. There were several other diversions that day. The plane landed safely in Fort Lauderdale at 7:45PM, after 3hr30min in the air.

The overall flight path of the Southwest 737

Below you can see a depiction of what happened, plus you can hear the ATC audio. Thanks to “You can see ATC” for discovering this incident in the first place.

The plane on approach immediately ahead of this was also a Southwest 737. When that plane was four miles out, it was at an altitude of 1,300 feet, so that gives you a sense of just how far off 150 feet is. The crew of that flight was asked by air traffic control to report on weather conditions, and stated the following:

“Actually three miles in was moderate rain and just a light chop. The bad stuff is probably 5, 6, 7 miles out with that gust.”

How could this Southwest Tampa incident happen?

We’ve seen a slew of Southwest incidents recently, though I have to say, this one seems like it was the closest to being a disaster. The plane was 150 feet above the bay, and that doesn’t even account for the bridge that’s elevated above the water.

First and foremost, the air traffic controller here deserves massive kudos. This could have had a very different outcome, and he might have just saved a lot of lives that day. I know air traffic controllers have stressful jobs, but credit to this guy for his performance and timing. If he had waited a few more seconds, this could have had a different outcome.

At first, one theory had been that the pilots had the altimeter set incorrectly. For those not familiar with the altimeter, this is the instrument that measures the altitude a plane is at. The catch is that the altimeter always has to be set to local settings, based on the conditions in a place. However, unless the altimeter was on a completely wrong setting, that wouldn’t explain more than a couple hundred feet of altitude difference. So there must be more to this…

That brings us to what might just be the most likely explanation as of now. The excellent YouTube channel “blancolirio” (run by an airline pilot) has an analysis of the incident, and presents an interesting theory (around seven minutes into the video).

Based on analyzing the data and downloading it into Google Earth, it sure looks like the pilots may have mistaken the Courtney Campbell Causeway for the runway, so they were seconds from trying to land on a bridge, miles from the runway.

Of course this completely defies logic. One has to wonder how two airline pilots could make such a mistake, when it should be obvious that this wasn’t the runway. Then again, there’s not any other logical explanation for why pilots would be flying a plane down to 150 feet, while several miles from the runway. We’ll see what the investigation reveals, but based on the plane’s altitude and heading, it’s hard to imagine that this wasn’t the case…

Were the pilots preparing to land on a bridge?

Does Southwest have an issue with its safety culture?

It’s kind of unbelievable how many close calls Southwest planes have had lately. Just in recent months, we’ve seen a scary go around in Hawaii, a dangerously low approach in Oklahoma City, an inflight Dutch roll, and taking off from a closed runway. And those are just several of the incidents that have been reported.

This incident in Tampa sure seems eerily similar to the Oklahoma City incident, where the plane descended to a dangerously low altitude several miles from the runway.

Is this just bad luck, or does Southwest have a problem? Admittedly Southwest is a huge airline, and operates a lot of flights each day. However, a disproportionate number of the recent incidents involving pilot error are at Southwest.

Just about all US airlines have more junior cockpits than they did before the pandemic, given how many new pilots have been hired. However, what’s specifically going on at Southwest that’s causing this? It’s beyond my pay grade, but at this point I think it’s hard to fully chalk this up to a coincidence.

For all the increased oversight that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has over United Airlines for safety issues, maybe it’s time for the government to look at Southwest’s situation with pilots…

What’s going on at Southwest lately?

Bottom line

A Southwest Airlines Boeing 737 MAX had a pretty wild approach to Tampa Airport. Weather conditions weren’t great, and for whatever reason, the plane descended down to 150 feet around four miles from the runway. Fortunately the air traffic controller received a low altitude alert and warned the crew, at which point they initiated a go around.

An investigation has now been opened into what happened. It would appear that the most likely explanation is that the pilots had mistaken the bridge for the runway. It’s shocking that this is an error they could make, but it makes more sense than any other theory.

What do you make of this latest Southwest incident?

Conversations (84)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Cathy Guest

Could it have been a down burst ? Given that the preceding pilots mentioned worse weather about 8 miles further out

0
‼ 0
Dan Guest

I am a retired airline captain with many thousand hours in the B737. Most Legacy air carriers tune in the ILS (Instrument Landing System) frequency for the landing runway. That gives us guidance and vertical clearance for that particular runway. If we make major deviations from the approach, we receive both verbal and visual warnings. In every FAR Part 121 airplane there is a GPWS (Ground Proximity Warning System). That too gives us verbal and visual warnings if we are too low, etc. We also set our altitude that we want to hold or go to on our Flight Management System which can be connected to our auto pilot system. That too gives us audio and visual warnings. For this crew to be so screwed up that they were off course and all over the sky up and down, something was very wrong. I suspect they were disoriented not knowing where they were. They obviously lacked situational awareness of where they were up, down or course wise. The warning signals from the Altitude Hold FMS, ILS, or GPWS are loud and LOUDER. The ONLY way that they can be ignored or not heard is by disabling those systems. For normal operations, disabling the GPWS is a flight violation. The GPWS control panel is safety wired. If that wire is broken, there is a mandatory maintenance write up explaining why. Regardless of what in the hell was going on in the cockpit of this airplane, it is clear that this crew ignored / disabled ALL of these warning devices. For that reason alone, they should be terminated. As a former union representative with 22,000 hours of accident free flying time, I do not make this statement lightly. This near disaster took place with INTENT. Both pilots are responsible for the safety of the passengers and crew. If they were lost, then say so. If they had a problem with the airplane then say so. To my knowledge none of this took place. I am familiar with this airline and it appears that they foster a cowboy mentality by cutting corners to save time and money which almost always compromises safety. Ref. this airline had a similar near mishap while making an approach into Honolulu. Folks, two near misses with disaster is not a coincidence.

0
‼ 0
Anthony Joseph Guest

It's a company and work ethic issues that are the problem. Pilots have about the best working conditions in the universe; they make a more than comfortable income even with their working hours capped at ~1000 hr/yr.\ They ARE BEING PAID TO BE PAID 110% alert when they are in the cockpit and to have continuous self re-education when on the ground.... and they have have tons of time to do this in hotel rooms on layovers etc. A lot of Gen Z'ers are a selfish bunch who have poor work ethics and unrealistic expectations on "entitlements". If the captain is flying the plane, it's up to the first officer to be totally alert on the rest of the logistics and questioning (situational awareness) what is going on, particularly during bad weather landing .... instead of sitting back being scared and "going for the ride". Many, many an aircraft accident caused by pilot error was because of poor cockpit communications between the pilots, particularly on decision making prrocess and having clear consensus on actions in the cockpit. Haven't we learned from the past?

0
‼ 0
TTuan Guest

Haha too bad... both pilots are white. Maybe the industry should open up to more qualified DEIs instead of gatekeeping it to be so white?

0
‼ 0
DeeplyConfused Guest

I’m deeply confused by how all these incidents are happening with no reports from the passengers afterward. Is everyone that zombied out and unaware of their surroundings nowadays? Not even looking out the window when something feels weird? It just seems hard to imagine you don’t notice suddenly flying very near the ground then climbing again and landing somewhere else. Thanks for the write up.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published