Whoa: Lufthansa Wants To Stop Fighting With Employees, Aims For Labor Peace

Lufthansa has long struggled with labor relations, and it has cost the airline dearly. Over the years we’ve seen endless strikes at the airline, and in the end, management seems to lose. It’s amazing how executives at the airline make the same mistake over and over, while expecting different results.

The irony is that Lufthansa Group CEO Carsten Spohr is a former pilot, so you’d think he’d be on the side of labor. But it’s clear that as soon as he crossed over to management, he’s had a certain disdain for those who keep the airline running (at least that’s what his actions reflect).

Well, could Lufthansa finally be turning over a new leaf? Management seems to be suggesting so, but only time will tell if this is just talk, or if there’s meaningful action behind it.

Lufthansa wants to work with labor on long term solutions

This is Lufthansa’s 100th anniversary, so it’s supposed to be a year of celebration. Instead, this spring we saw employees stage back-to-back-to-back strikes, as both pilots and flight attendants had industrial action that grounded the airline for roughly a week, costing the company hundreds of millions of dollars. This also caused Lufthansa’s CityLine subsidiary to be shut down overnight.

While we haven’t seen formal strikes since then, the contract negotiations are ongoing, so additional industrial action isn’t yet off the table. However, for the first time that I can remember, it seems like Lufthansa management is actually acknowledging that it needs to change its approach with labor.

In talking about labor relations at the carrier, Lufthansa’s Chief Human Resources Officer, Michael Niggemann, said that “we need to talk with each other again, instead of about each other.” He also said that “it’s important that we not only find solutions to the current collective bargaining disputes, but also create a solid foundation for cooperation in the years to come.”

Those are certainly the right words, so let’s see if there are any actions behind that. Slightly more concretely, it seems that the two parties have agreed on a framework by which they’ll arbitrate labor disputes, with the union representing pilots informing members that negotiations will be used to find solutions, rather than industrial action.

Generally Lufthansa’s labor relations issues have come down to a lack of goodwill and cooperation between management and the unions.

Despite being the “flagship” airline, Lufthansa is the lowest margin airline in Lufthansa Group. How you want to analyze that depends on your perspective:

  • Management keeps creating new airline subsidiaries due to this lack of profitability, arguing that the labor contracts for Lufthansa directly are too expensive
  • Labor unions argue that Lufthansa is the least profitable airline because the airline group keeps outsourcing flying, so of course what’s left is of limited value, since the flagship brand is being “sacrificed”
Lufthansa’s 100th anniversary hasn’t been great for labor

Air France-KLM is to “blame” for Lufthansa’s new approach

Why is Lufthansa suddenly taking a new approach to labor relations? I mean, logically one would assume that management would come to the conclusion that it’s good for business to be on good terms with employees. But it’s probably not quite that straightforward. I suspect Lufthansa Group management is also realizing that as we increasingly see consolidation among European airlines, labor peace is an important point of differentiation.

I think there’s one man and airline group that is putting this pressure on Lufthansa Group — that’s Ben Smith at Air France-KLM. Prior to 2018, labor relations at Air France were horrendous. I mean, in 2015, a protest by employees looked more like January 6, with executives having their shirts ripped off, and scaling a fence to escape.

However, it has been a completely different story since Smith took over in 2018. Since then, Air France hasn’t seen a single major case of industrial action. Yes, in eight years. That’s beyond remarkable.

I know a lot of anti-union people like to always blame unions for the kind of unrest, and for being unreasonable, while giving management a pass. Yes, unions can be challenging. But I think the perfect counterpoint to that is what we’ve seen at Air France. Air France has gone from worst to first when it comes to labor relations in Europe, so how is that possible?

Well, Smith has a deep respect for employees, he’s a huge aviation geek (which employees very much respect), and he fundamentally views labor and management as being collaborative, rather than at odds with one another. He also understands the value in making strategic investments to make employees happy.

For example, when he started in his role, one of his first orders of business was to eliminate low cost carrier Joon, moving the employees there onto contracts with higher pay. That’s literally the opposite of what we see at Lufthansa Group, where it’s all about forming new subsidiaries in order to cut labor costs, at the expense of existing employees.

Smith’s attitude is essentially “hey, we (management and the employees) want the same thing, which is for the airline to succeed, so how can we come to an agreement where everyone can be happy?” Respect goes a long way… maybe it’s a lesson that Spohr and his team are finally learning?

Bottom line

Lufthansa management claims it’ll take a new approach to labor relations, increasingly trying to collaborate with unions to find long term solutions. This is such a departure from what we’ve seen at Lufthansa over the past couple of decades, so I’m skeptical, but it would certainly be great to see.

I think Air France has put the pressure on Lufthansa when it comes to showing the power of good labor relations, given how much the labor situation at Air France has transformed.

What do you think — will Lufthansa management actually turn over a new leaf with labor relations, or is this all talk?

Conversations (51)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

JdV Guest

Fighting with staff. Labour disputes. While trying to buy a share in TAP Air Portugal. Ok. What could possibly go wrong.....

0
‼ 0
Stanley C Diamond

Carsten Spohr is a turn coat that should have been let go many years ago. Ben Smith is a huge aviation geek that can get the job done. Ben is an aviation geek who is also German so maybe Lufthansa should hire Ben and finally get a ‘Lucky’ break. And if Spohr is behind this supposed change of heart then there is more to it. He may want to do this to have a better presentation to get Lufthansa approved for a 44.9 percent stake in TAP Air Portugal. Time will tell.

0
‼ 0
Frog Guest

Well, if they are at all serious about improving relations the very first step would be to can Spohr. I don’t see how they can start building trust while he’s still around.

0
‼ 0
Michael_FFM Diamond

When I read that news first it felt like my head exploded in disbelief. I still think it will take many, many years to re-establish the trust which was destroyed over the last decade ( or even 2 decades?). And I will believe it when I see it, as the animosity on both sides is deeply ingrained in institutional memory. Letting Spohr go would be a good sign of good faith on Management‘s part.

0
‼ 0
Samo Diamond

It's good that LHG's management finally realizes that they can't win this war - but I'm afraid that's what it is. A capitulation rather than change of attitude, and for that reason I don't think it's gonna work. The comparison to the job Ben Smith did is very on point, but his success was largely based on his personality and the way of thinking. In case of Lufthansa I'm afraid we're just seeing a bunch of guys worried about their KPIs. I will also be interested to see how this extends to Swiss, where there's a growing discontent with the airline being Lufthansi(shiti)fied, to the point of some cabin crews flat out refusing to mention Lufthansa Group in the PAs, despite officially being required to do so. I predict that this will be the arena where we'll see how much the LHG's management means what they say. (And I'm saying all that as someone who believes that EU3, or at least LHG and AFKL should move towards just using one brand. It's just extremely poorly executed on LHG's side, with the profitable part of the company being enslaved by the one that is losing money.)

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published