Whoa: Lufthansa Wants To Stop Fighting With Employees, Aims For Labor Peace

Whoa: Lufthansa Wants To Stop Fighting With Employees, Aims For Labor Peace

18

Lufthansa has long struggled with labor relations, and it has cost the airline dearly. Over the years we’ve seen endless strikes at the airline, and in the end, management seems to lose. It’s amazing how executives at the airline make the same mistake over and over, while expecting different results.

The irony is that Lufthansa Group CEO Carsten Spohr is a former pilot, so you’d think he’d be on the side of labor. But it’s clear that as soon as he crossed over to management, he’s had a certain disdain for those who keep the airline running (at least that’s what his actions reflect).

Well, could Lufthansa finally be turning over a new leaf? Management seems to be suggesting so, but only time will tell if this is just talk, or if there’s meaningful action behind it.

Lufthansa wants to work with labor on long term solutions

This is Lufthansa’s 100th anniversary, so it’s supposed to be a year of celebration. Instead, this spring we saw employees stage back-to-back-to-back strikes, as both pilots and flight attendants had industrial action that grounded the airline for roughly a week, costing the company hundreds of millions of dollars. This also caused Lufthansa’s CityLine subsidiary to be shut down overnight.

While we haven’t seen formal strikes since then, the contract negotiations are ongoing, so additional industrial action isn’t yet off the table. However, for the first time that I can remember, it seems like Lufthansa management is actually acknowledging that it needs to change its approach with labor.

In talking about labor relations at the carrier, Lufthansa’s Chief Human Resources Officer, Michael Niggemann, said that “we need to talk with each other again, instead of about each other.” He also said that “it’s important that we not only find solutions to the current collective bargaining disputes, but also create a solid foundation for cooperation in the years to come.”

Those are certainly the right words, so let’s see if there are any actions behind that. Slightly more concretely, it seems that the two parties have agreed on a framework by which they’ll arbitrate labor disputes, with the union representing pilots informing members that negotiations will be used to find solutions, rather than industrial action.

Generally Lufthansa’s labor relations issues have come down to a lack of goodwill and cooperation between management and the unions.

Despite being the “flagship” airline, Lufthansa is the lowest margin airline in Lufthansa Group. How you want to analyze that depends on your perspective:

  • Management keeps creating new airline subsidiaries due to this lack of profitability, arguing that the labor contracts for Lufthansa directly are too expensive
  • Labor unions argue that Lufthansa is the least profitable airline because the airline group keeps outsourcing flying, so of course what’s left is of limited value, since the flagship brand is being “sacrificed”
Lufthansa’s 100th anniversary hasn’t been great for labor

Air France-KLM is to “blame” for Lufthansa’s new approach

Why is Lufthansa suddenly taking a new approach to labor relations? I mean, logically one would assume that management would come to the conclusion that it’s good for business to be on good terms with employees. But it’s probably not quite that straightforward. I suspect Lufthansa Group management is also realizing that as we increasingly see consolidation among European airlines, labor peace is an important point of differentiation.

I think there’s one man and airline group that is putting this pressure on Lufthansa Group — that’s Ben Smith at Air France-KLM. Prior to 2018, labor relations at Air France were horrendous. I mean, in 2015, a protest by employees looked more like January 6, with executives having their shirts ripped off, and scaling a fence to escape.

However, it has been a completely different story since Smith took over in 2018. Since then, Air France hasn’t seen a single major case of industrial action. Yes, in eight years. That’s beyond remarkable.

I know a lot of anti-union people like to always blame unions for the kind of unrest, and for being unreasonable, while giving management a pass. Yes, unions can be challenging. But I think the perfect counterpoint to that is what we’ve seen at Air France. Air France has gone from worst to first when it comes to labor relations in Europe, so how is that possible?

Well, Smith has a deep respect for employees, he’s a huge aviation geek (which employees very much respect), and he fundamentally views labor and management as being collaborative, rather than at odds with one another. He also understands the value in making strategic investments to make employees happy.

For example, when he started in his role, one of his first orders of business was to eliminate low cost carrier Joon, moving the employees there onto contracts with higher pay. That’s literally the opposite of what we see at Lufthansa Group, where it’s all about forming new subsidiaries in order to cut labor costs, at the expense of existing employees.

Smith’s attitude is essentially “hey, we (management and the employees) want the same thing, which is for the airline to succeed, so how can we come to an agreement where everyone can be happy?” Respect goes a long way… maybe it’s a lesson that Spohr and his team are finally learning?

Bottom line

Lufthansa management claims it’ll take a new approach to labor relations, increasingly trying to collaborate with unions to find long term solutions. This is such a departure from what we’ve seen at Lufthansa over the past couple of decades, so I’m skeptical, but it would certainly be great to see.

I think Air France has put the pressure on Lufthansa when it comes to showing the power of good labor relations, given how much the labor situation at Air France has transformed.

What do you think — will Lufthansa management actually turn over a new leaf with labor relations, or is this all talk?

Conversations (18)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. rebel Diamond

    This is no way to run an airline/group

    Lufthansa Group €40

    Major Network Carriers
    Lufthansa Airlines: The main German flag carrier €16b
    SWISS: National airline of Switzerland €6b
    Austrian Airlines: Flag carrier of Austria €2.5b
    Brussels Airlines: Belgium's leading airline €1.6b
    ITA Airways: Italian carrier €3.2b

    Point-to-Point and Value Carriers
    Eurowings: Short/medium-haul value carrier

    Regional and Leisure Airlines
    Discover Airlines: German leisure and holiday airline
    Edelweiss Air:...

    This is no way to run an airline/group

    Lufthansa Group €40

    Major Network Carriers
    Lufthansa Airlines: The main German flag carrier €16b
    SWISS: National airline of Switzerland €6b
    Austrian Airlines: Flag carrier of Austria €2.5b
    Brussels Airlines: Belgium's leading airline €1.6b
    ITA Airways: Italian carrier €3.2b

    Point-to-Point and Value Carriers
    Eurowings: Short/medium-haul value carrier

    Regional and Leisure Airlines
    Discover Airlines: German leisure and holiday airline
    Edelweiss Air: SWISS affiliated leisure airline
    Air Dolomiti: Italian regional airline
    Lufthansa CityLine
    Lufthansa City Airlines

    1. 1990 Guest

      You left out the best part, Rebel. Half of those sub-brands exist for no other reason than to act as labor-busting whips for management.

      When they spend more time inventing pop-up regional subsidiaries to dodge labor contracts than you do fixing premium cabin product, this is the chaotic cluster you end up with. Luftkafka.

    2. rebel Diamond

      1990 says, "You left out the best part, Rebel. Half of those sub-brands exist for no other reason than to act as labor-busting whips for management."

      Agreed. The flag carriers are understandable to an extent, but the union busting subsidiaries have been proven to be self-defeating in a service business.

  2. Tim Dunn Diamond

    aviation has long had strong nationalistic overtones including labor-mgmt conflict.

    There have been large airlines that never really bought into that model and the success to show for it so it isn't a surprise that people at LH - including hopefully the board - are asking if LH's approach is in the best interest of companies; the answer undoubtedly is that something has to change WRT LH labor relations

    1. 1990 Guest

      Spare us, Tim. SkyTeam partner Air France proved you don't need union-busting to build a stable, top-tier airline; management just had to stop treating its workers like the enemy. 'Something has to change' at Lufthansa, alright: executive leadership needs to pay market wages, respect contract terms, and stop wasting billions picking fights they keep losing.

      Oh, and Delta's FAs, baggage handlers, and maintenance technicians are still overdue to join the pilots (since 1934!) and dispatchers...

      Spare us, Tim. SkyTeam partner Air France proved you don't need union-busting to build a stable, top-tier airline; management just had to stop treating its workers like the enemy. 'Something has to change' at Lufthansa, alright: executive leadership needs to pay market wages, respect contract terms, and stop wasting billions picking fights they keep losing.

      Oh, and Delta's FAs, baggage handlers, and maintenance technicians are still overdue to join the pilots (since 1934!) and dispatchers in organizing. You wait, bud.

    2. 1990 Guest

      And, Tim, don't worry, as for the OMAAT leaderboard, while Willy has more points than you and is Most Liked (meaning he's winning), you've still got more Hot Takes and are the Most Prolific, whatever those mean.

    3. Lee Guest

      I didn't take Tim's call for change as anti-union. Simply change. And, maybe that chair is new leadership with a new leadership style. Maybe I'm wrong.

    4. 1990 Guest

      Oh, sweet, sweet, Lee... that’s viewing Tim’s comment in a sterile vacuum, completely ignoring years of his anti-union posts on this site. Downplaying management's relentless labor fights as 'nationalistic overtones' is just his usual way of sanitizing C-suite hostility. He knows what he's implying; he just dresses it up in corporate jargon so people like you give him the benefit of the doubt. I'm just calling it out for what it actually is.

    5. betterbub Diamond

      @1990 your constant presence in the comment section is not less insufferable than the person you're replying to

  3. TravelinWilly Diamond

    Step 1: Fire Carsten Spohr.

    Step 2: Anything else.

    Step 3: See Step 2.

    1. 1990 Guest

      Still going for that gift card, huh? Hurry up, Tim's on your tail. 810 vs. 750 as of today. Go! Go! GO!!

    2. TravelinWilly Diamond

      "Still going for that gift card, huh? Hurry up, Tim's on your tail. 810 vs. 750 as of today. Go! Go! GO!!"

      ?

  4. NDG Guest

    I'm a Ben Smith fan too, but I think you're painting too much of a rosy picture.

    He was loathed at Air Canada by airports and ifs employees for being in everyone's business, being overcritical, etc.

    1. Ben Schlappig OMAAT

      @ NDG -- I can't speak to those specific sentiments, but if we're mentioning Air Canada, we also have to acknowledge that he was behind the 10-year pilot contract, which also resulted in the longest period of labor peace among pilots at the airline in history (to my knowledge).

  5. Exit Row Seat Guest

    Do they have profit sharing at Lufthansa?? Great incentive device....just ask Delta!

    1. 1990 Guest

      You do realize Delta’s profit-sharing formula was negotiated by its pilots' union (ALPA); management only extended it to the rest of the company to keep other workgroups from organizing. So yes, union leverage built that "incentive device." Beyond that, a variable bonus check isn't a substitute for guaranteed base wages, humane scheduling, and pension protections that survive the next economic downturn. (Nice try...)

  6. 1990 Guest

    Good update, Ben. Bottom line: pay your people, respect their contract terms, stop trying to route legacy mainline flying to cheap subsidiaries, and focus on delivering a functional product. It shouldn't have taken 50,000 canceled flights and billions in losses for Frankfurt to figure out what Ben Smith realized in Paris 8 years ago. (And now, for the typical union-bashers to completely ignore the article, the details, the reality, and just say mean things about...

    Good update, Ben. Bottom line: pay your people, respect their contract terms, stop trying to route legacy mainline flying to cheap subsidiaries, and focus on delivering a functional product. It shouldn't have taken 50,000 canceled flights and billions in losses for Frankfurt to figure out what Ben Smith realized in Paris 8 years ago. (And now, for the typical union-bashers to completely ignore the article, the details, the reality, and just say mean things about workers, like usual...)

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

rebel Diamond

1990 says, "You left out the best part, Rebel. Half of those sub-brands exist for no other reason than to act as labor-busting whips for management." Agreed. The flag carriers are understandable to an extent, but the union busting subsidiaries have been proven to be self-defeating in a service business.

0
0
betterbub Diamond

@1990 your constant presence in the comment section is not less insufferable than the person you're replying to

0
0
1990 Guest

You left out the best part, Rebel. Half of those sub-brands exist for no other reason than to act as labor-busting whips for management. When they spend more time inventing pop-up regional subsidiaries to dodge labor contracts than you do fixing premium cabin product, this is the chaotic cluster you end up with. Luftkafka.

0
0
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published