Can You Wear “Let’s Go Brandon” Gear On An Airplane?

There’s an alarming trend of people trying to wear “Let’s Go Brandon” attire on planes, and then being asked to change. Then the people try to act confused, and claim that their freedoms are being violated. I wanted to address this, because it really isn’t that complicated.

Before I do so, let me note that this is the only time I’ll ever write about this topic (and I’d like to point out I’ve never written a “Let’s Go Brandon” travel story, and that trend will continue after this).

Spirit Airlines crew asks passenger to change mask

The latest incident of “Let’s Go Brandon” airplane outrage comes from Spirit Airlines flight 3317 from Cleveland to Tampa on Friday, January 28, 2022. In a video posted to social media, a man is very proud of wearing a mask with colorful, scrolling text that reads “Let’s Go Brandon FJB,” with “FJB” standing for “f*ck Joe Biden.”

Once the man is in his seat, a crew member comes by and hands him a blue surgical mask. The passenger asks why he’s being asked to put that on, and the crew member explains it’s because his mask is offensive. When he asks about that, the flight attendant responds “it can be to some people, so we’re not going to go back and forth, just go ahead and put the blue one on.”

The guy is then shocked, and says “wow, this is not America anymore.” He then continues “of course they make their own rules, it’s not America, it’s not First Amendment.”

https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1487164691772227586

Then a second video was posted to social media as the man deplanes, when he confronts the crew once again (in this case he’s back to wearing his old mask). He asks a flight attendant if there’s any way to speak to a supervisor. The passenger then tries to compare the mask to BLM masks being allowed.

At this point the flight attendant briefly engages him:

Flight attendant: “What does that mean?” (pointing at his mask)
Passenger: “Let’s go Brandon.”
Flight attendant: “What does that mean?”
Passenger: “It’s my name.”

At this point another flight attendant approaches, and asks the guy to stop recording, a wish he doesn’t honor. Instead he badgers her, saying “but isn’t it freedom of speech to have this mask on?”

Ironically the man was also wearing a “Let’s Go Brandon” hoodie, which the crew seemed to overlook.

This really isn’t that complicated…

I think most reasonable people don’t need an explanation, but I do find peoples’ faux disbelief and outrage when they’re asked to change out of these masks to be exhausting. So let me explain this as succinctly as possible.

First of all, this isn’t a First Amendment issue. When you book an airline ticket you agree to a contract of carriage. The contract of carriage explicitly states that passengers may be required to leave the aircraft if they wear clothing that is “offensive in nature.”

I don’t understand how people claim that this is a First Amendment issue and that this isn’t America anymore. Should I be allowed to wear a mask that says I’m going to blow the plane up, without suffering any consequences? Should I be allowed to dine at an Olive Garden naked? Are people truly this stupid, or just dense?

Next, I don’t understand why people can’t just own the meaning behind the phrase? The passenger claims that he’s wearing the mask because his name is Brandon, which is a lie. Never mind the fact that he had to put “FJB” behind “Let’s Go Brandon,” because I guess subtlety isn’t his strong suit?

By the way, this guy also Tweets about his love of God, and last I checked, one of the 10 Commandments is to not lie. So rather than being focused on misrepresenting the Constitution, maybe read the Bible a bit more closely?

Let’s be honest for a moment, the phrase “Let’s Go Brandon” is quite literally designed to be offensive. That’s the whole point of it. People should be allowed to wear that in public if they’d like, but I’m sure all of us freedom-loving folks can also appreciate that private companies can set their own policies, no?

And let me absolutely clear — if someone wore a shirt that that said “F*ck Donald Trump” (or insert any other politician), they should also be asked to remove that if a business has a policy against clothing with offensive messaging.

Similarly, if there were a phrase that were used on a widespread basis that meant nothing other than “F*ck Donald Trump,” that would be offensive as well, and someone shouldn’t be allowed to wear that on a plane.

It seems that people think they’ve found a loophole here. They think that because they’re not outright telling someone to f*ck themselves, they can get away with it. And maybe that works when something is subtle, but you can’t constantly plaster it all over the place and still play the ignorance card. The “Let’s Go Brandon” thing has become a bit trite, if you ask me.

It’s not that complicated, I swear.

Bottom line

Airlines have contracts of carriage. When you book a ticket, you agree to that contract of carriage, even if you don’t read it. Most airlines prohibit people from wearing clothes that is “offensive in nature.” Wearing clothing that tells a particular person to go f*ck themselves (whether explicitly or implicitly) is… offensive in nature. This has nothing to do with freedom. This has nothing to do with the First Amendment. Why is that so hard to own?

Conversations (230)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Charles Rathmann Guest

In this case, apart from being offensive, wearing apparel that glorifies domestic terrorism and extrajudicial killing is probably just not something to do on a commercial airliner.

0
‼ 0
Alex Guest

The irony in telling people to grow up or fall in line. Listen to the science. Sure. Grow up and quit worrying about other people goes both ways. You are so afraid to get the cold, maybe you shouldn't leave the house. Freedom isn't about freedom from government. Freedom is a culture. So many of you quit being allowed to get offended, you would stop crying about being offended so much. The culture of being free shouldn't be stripped because you're a business and can set whatever rules you want. Uhm. Go tell that to the bakers. Or the business rules only apply to " your science"? Anyone else see how loaded that question is? So just like you want me to shove my Freedom up my ass, go shove yours. By the way. Your plain light blue shirt offends me. Now what. LETS GO BRANDON.

0
‼ 0
Neville Douglas Richards Guest

First of all let's make this clear airlines operate under the Federal aviation commission keyword Federal when you sign on to operate under the direction of the federal government you as an individual or a company have to adopt the regulations that the federal government have and one of those regulations clearly state freedom of speech and the Constitution now the employer that is operating under the federal government might restrict its employees to say certain things but that employer or employees of that employer cannot turn around and say or apply restrictions to their passengers when this goes to court the airlines are going to lose. Because when you step on an airplane you are no longer under the control of the private entity you are now under the control of the federal government not the county government or the airport is or the government where the airport is based when you're on that plane as a passenger you're under the control of the federal government and your constitutional rights to free speech matter that's why the airlines are going to lose

0
‼ 0
Joe Mama Guest

To set the record strait you do have freedom of speech on social media

0
‼ 0
William Ellison Guest

These are law suits waiting to happen. It is true the airline can refuse service to anyone for no reason, but they can't claim a reason, that reason being they don't like your political statement, and then use the state to kick you off the plan by force. This is a misuse of Public Service. Now, if they came up to him and just kicked him off the plan with no reason that would be fine. This person was on private property, so they don't need a reason. They can just say we want him off the property. They get in trouble when they claim a reason. I've seen this play out in court many times folks, so take my word for it. Also companies can't make policy around offensive language or statements because it's all subjective, and then try to use the state to enforce those policies. That is where the legal trouble comes into play. Going to be a big pay day when all the dust settles.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published