Book Aisle & Window Seat, Hope For Empty Middle: Smart, Rude, Or Both?

The single most in-demand “asset” on an airplane is personal space, and there are all kinds of methods people use to try to maximize the amount of space they have. That includes trying to use strategies to maximize the odds of having an empty seat next to you.

An OMAAT reader asked me a question specifically about the concept of booking an aisle and window seat (in planes with clusters of three seats), and hoping the middle seat stays empty. I’d like to address that more broadly — is that a smart strategy? What are the odds of it actually working? And is this inconsiderate toward fellow passengers?

There’s nothing wrong with using the aisle & window seat hack

As you’d expect, passengers typically prefer an aisle or window seat, with middle seats being considered the least desirable. If you’re traveling as a couple (or pair of friends, or whatever) in economy, the ideal situation is to have an aisle and window seat, with an empty middle seat.

Now, of course there’s no way to guarantee the middle seat is empty (unless you pay for it), though the play is generally twofold:

  • The hope is that there’s some empty seats on the plane, and that one of those empty seats is the middle seat next to you
  • Worst case scenario you can either keep your aisle and window seat, or swap with the person in the middle, who will almost always be willing to trade, since that’s a more-than-fair seat swap request

So, is employing the aisle and window seat strategy smart, and is it considerate toward others?

Regarding the first point, yes, I’d argue that it does make sense, assuming you’re not paying a huge premium for the aisle and window seats (unless you actually want to keep those). With how airline seats are monetized nowadays, there’s nothing wrong with selecting a great seat (especially via elite status), and then being willing to give someone that better seat once onboard.

Of course it pays to be strategic, and I’ve written in the past about the best ways to secure an empty seat next to you (book as far back as you can within the section you’re seated, since seats are typically filled front to back).

So I don’t view this as inconsiderate or unethical. Ultimately you’re maximizing your odds of getting an empty middle seat, and worst case scenario, you’re offering someone else a better seat.

Now, of course big picture it’s worth acknowledging that if enough couples employ this strategy and actually want to sit next to one another, it does at some point skew seating charts, and just complicate things for everyone. But I think that falls a little too much in the “if everyone did X, then…” category.

I think it’s fine to assign an aisle & window seat

However, don’t be a jerk to the middle seat passenger

As I see it, there’s only one aspect of this strategy that’s potentially objectionable. If you do book a window and aisle seat, and if you don’t actually plan on swapping seats with the person in the middle, you owe it to them to be considerate.

The person in the aisle and window seat shouldn’t be passing stuff back and forth, talking constantly, etc. The person in the middle seat already doesn’t have enough space, and the last thing they deserve is to feel like they’re sandwiched between two people who are acting as if they’re seated next to one another in terms of interactions.

I witnessed this on a flight recently, where a couple was in the aisle and window. The person in the middle asked if they wanted to sit together, and they said they didn’t… but then once at cruising altitude, they carried on having an extended conversation, with the person in the middle just sort of leaning forward so they could talk. He was an absolute saint, to the point that I was about to tell him to stop being so nice.

Please be considerate to the person in the middle seat

Bottom line

It’s common to see travelers booking an aisle and window seat in planes with sets of three seats, in hopes of the middle seat staying empty. Given how airplane seats are monetized, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with this strategy. Best case scenario, you get an empty seat between you. Worst case scenario, you can either keep your preferred seats, or swap with the person in the middle.

I think the only point at which this becomes an issue is if you do keep the aisle and window seat, and then proceed to talk a lot, pass stuff over the person in the middle seat, etc.

Where do you stand on the concept of selecting an aisle and window seat, in hopes of having an empty middle?

Conversations (72)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Sal Guest

I wish people would stop trying to rationalize clearly unethical behavior. By doing this, you are forcing the middle passenger to engage in your scheme. Case in point, some people believe that when you employ this practice, it is your obligation to offer the seat passenger the seat of their choice i.e. the aisle or the window. Others believe that in this situation the middle passengers only entitled to swap with the aisle seat but not the window. That can get really dicey because they are actually prefer middle seats to aisle seats. By doing this you are gaming the system and forcing the middle passenger to engage in your drama. Yes, nine times out of ten, the situation will be resolved to everybody's satisfaction, but that does not make it ethical.

0
‼ 0
Max Guest

For plane with 3-3-3 seating configuration, I will book the aisle seats on both sides of the middle section, that way, if someone sits in the middle and I offer my seat to sit beside my wife, there won't be a dilemma of giving up aisle or window seat, since both are aisle seats anyway. I think the person in the middle will be more willing to swap in this case.

0
‼ 0
AD Diamond

When traveling with my son when he was a teen, I'd always book an aisle and a window. If someone showed up for the middle, we'd offer them the window. One time a woman showed up and we offered her the window and she said she'd take the aisle. I told her that wasn't on offer. So, she spent the flight in the middle. Granted, my son is the world's best airplane sleeper... from before the door closes to after we land unless there's food. So, there wasn't a lot of discussion across her, but I did think she cut off her nose to spite her face.

0
‼ 0
iamhere Guest

Two aisles a better idea.

1
‼ 0
Albert Guest

We were introduced to this idea by a kerbside check-in agent at SEA in 2005. We do it where the online system allows. We then sit in aisle and middle. If somebody does arrive then I say "You have been upgraded to the window". Have never had anybody object to that.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published