New Legislation Takes Aim At Credit Card Fees & Rewards

The Wall Street Journal reports on some upcoming legislation that could cap credit card fees, which in turn could destroy credit card rewards in the United States as we know them.

Senate bill could change credit card industry

Over the years we’ve seen quite a few politicians talk about capping credit card fees, as a way of making it seem like they’re looking out for small businesses and consumers. Typically nothing comes of this, though we’re seeing the latest such proposal now.

Senators Dick Durbin (a Democrat from Illinois) and Roger Marshall (a Republican from Kansas) are preparing to introduce a bill that would allow merchants the ability to process Visa and Mastercard transactions over different networks.

This bill would mandate that merchants can route payments through an unaffiliated network, and this would apply to Visa or Mastercard credit cards issued by banks with more than $100 billion in assets. In other words, Visa and Mastercard would no longer have the same power when it comes to merchant fees.

The United States has among the highest merchant fees of any industrialized country in the world. It’s claimed that these fees amount to an average of 2.22% of transaction amounts, making swipe fees the highest operating costs for some merchants after labor. The argument is also made that these fees drive up consumer prices by more than $900 per year for the average American family. I think all of these claims are a bit extreme, but we’ll cover those later.

Now, I’d be surprised if this gets the votes needed to pass, though it is something that always seem to be discussed.

New legislation could greatly cap credit card merchant fees

This would have far-reaching impacts

If legislation like this were to pass, it wouldn’t just impact banks and payment networks. It would also impact all kinds of other industries.

Just take a look at the airline industry, for example. Major US airlines make more in profits from their co-brand credit card agreements than they do from actually flying passengers. Heck, during the pandemic we saw major airlines leverage their frequent flyer programs to secure financing, as they’re so valuable exactly because of these co-brand credit card agreements.

The US airline industry would look totally different if these caps were to be put into place. Delta employees? Your profit sharing check would look a lot smaller. American employees? Well… I mean, do I even need to say?

That’s just the tip of the iceberg…

This would not be good news for airlines

The flip-side of high credit card merchant fees

When we see legislation like this proposed, we often see a couple of narratives that I think are pretty disingenuous:

  • It’s claimed that the current credit card merchant fees are terrible for businesses, especially small businesses
  • It’s claimed that the current system causes poorer consumers (often those without credit cards) to subsidize purchases for richer consumers (often those with credit cards)

I think that’s a very narrow view of the credit card industry, and the overall benefit it brings to both businesses and consumers.

In terms of benefits for businesses:

  • For better or worse, people spend more when paying by credit card than when paying by cash
  • Yes, merchant fees are a significant expense for small businesses, but the cost of handling cash is also expensive, in terms of loss, theft, banking, etc.
  • Big businesses often save significant money with credit cards, as they’re able to get lucrative co-brand credit card agreements that bring their fees pretty close to zero

In terms of benefits for consumers:

  • Obviously credit cards can be extremely rewarding, and savvy consumers can recoup significantly more than the alleged price increases from accepting credit cards
  • Purchase and fraud protection is an awesome benefit that you don’t get when paying with cash, and typically won’t get when paying by debit card
  • Credit cards offer all kinds of other valuable perks, from rental car coverage, to travel protection, to cell phone protection

The argument that costs are driven up by over $900 per year for the average American family seems to be based on an alternate reality where consumers make exactly the same purchases and businesses have no costs associated with collecting cash. It assumes consumers never benefit from credit cards, whether it be from purchase protection, or rewards, or whatever else.

This would be bad news for credit card perks

Bottom line

We’re about to see legislation that would ultimately result in credit card merchant fees being significantly capped. If this were to pass and be fully implemented (which seems unlikely, but who knows), credit cards would look a whole lot like debit cards, in terms of benefits and fees.

Say goodbye to credit card rewards, and say goodbye to credit card protection and other benefits. Businesses can look forward to consumers spending less, and to have increased costs associated with other forms of payment.

That doesn’t even begin to address the impact this would have on so many other industries, in particular the travel industry.

What do you make of this proposed credit card legislation?

Conversations (68)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Kiwi Guest

Let’s not forget that typically rewards programs are funded by Interchange fees that support the card schemes and go directly to both the merchant(acquirer) and issuer bank and are set at the schema level for the product regardless of if they are processed on or off network.(currently a bank that is both acquirer and merchant has the ability to do “on us”processing and send transactions to Visa) This appears to target the network and processing fees charged by the network for processing on visanet etc. For small merchants these fees are often aggregated by their merchant services provider into a single swipe percentage fee but at large acquirers every cost component is negotiated.

0
‼ 0
Max Guest

Why does this read like a post by a lobbyist for the Credit Card industry... Not the balanced article I was hoping for I've gotta say

0
‼ 0
larrydeluca New Member

[accidentally tried to post not logged in - sorry if you see a similar comment twice.] This seems much hysteria, and the article does a poor job of linking the actual policies to the theoretical risk to the mileage programs. The airline and hotel industry are quite adept at dealing mortal wounds to their own loyalty programs unaided - just look at MGM Rewards or American Airlines' ironically-named "Loyalty Points." I used to take extra trips to Vegas to keep my $8K/year spend for my MGM Rewards. It was also, thanks to American Airlines' 1,000 mile/segment minimum for first class an excellent miles builder (I live in southern AZ, so short segments to PHX or LAX are very common). American was getting a bit pricier to keep up my spend, and when the EP minimum spend went up from $12K to $15K we fell back to Platinum Pro for a year (I buy tickets for two). In 2022, both MGM and American moved status out of reach of normal people. The devaluation of MGM's points program moved Platinum status from $8K/year to $50K/year (from 25 points/dollar to 4 points/dollar). American's Loyalty Points took the Platinum Pro spend from $9K to about $15K/year. The end result for someone who books his own travel and travels often for leisure is that we go to Vegas less and use American Airlines less. Delta has some very good fares out of Tucson (esp to places like Seattle) and the quality of the lounges is immensely better. I love Vegas, but it's no longer my default getaway, and MGM hotels are great but now I'm freed from using them exclusively. In short, the loyalty programs have pushed people out of being loyal. My brother's a pilot for one of the majors. When I bring this up to him he retorts "well, 70% of the revenue comes from the front of the plane, and 70% of the people in the back have no loyalty at all, fly once a year or less, and buy the cheapest ticket when they do." It only takes one quick peek behind the curtain to wonder why any airline would treat economy (and especially basic economy) flyers the way they do and expect any loyalty at all. If the airlines and hotels care about attracting and retaining customers, they'll offer good loyalty perks. If they perceive their business is entirely about mass action and limited options, the loyalty programs will continue to wither, no matter what happens to co-branded credit cards. If the airlines want to engender loyalty, they need to start offering the average person reasons to be loyal in the first place.

1
‼ 0
snic Guest

These arguments are very disingenuous, Ben: "For better or worse, people spend more when paying by credit card than when paying by cash Yes, merchant fees are a significant expense for small businesses, but the cost of handling cash is also expensive, in terms of loss, theft, banking, etc." These arguments would make sense if the proposed bill were to abolish credit cards. But it does not such thing. It just reduces costs for merchants via increased competition.

1
‼ 0
Larry DeLuca Guest

This might be the worst article ever published by this blog. The hysteria is completely unfounded. The author starts with a thesis that airline credit card programs will suffer, but provides zero evidence that this is the case. Moreover, his only objection to the very many real issues he cites with credit card processing as it currently exists is "cash is hard to handle, too." One need only look to MGM's 2022 shift from 25 points/dollar to 4 points/dollar for hotel and food spends (raising the threshold for MGM platinum from $8K to a $50K spend), or American Airlines' ironically named "Loyalty Points" (which raised their Platinum Pro spend from $9,000 to roughly $15,000 - about a 60% increase) to realize that the airline and travel industries are more than adept at inflicting mortal wounds to their loyalty programs themselves.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published