Trump is getting back into the airline business, though this time, with a different kind of “Trump Shuttle.” While we first learned about these plans last year, more information has just been released, thanks to a new tender that has been put out to aviation companies in support of this project.
In this post:
ICE acquiring its own fleet of planes for deportations
For years, the United States has contracted out to airlines for operating deportation flights. In recent years, airlines performing these flights have included Avelo Air, Eastern Air Express, GlobalX Air, Omni Air International, and World Atlantic Airlines. This is a lucrative arrangement for those airlines, and also gives them a steady income stream.
The Trump administration is of course trying to greatly increase the number of deportations. Trump has vowed to deport one million undocumented immigrations per year, and in his first year in office, ICE deported somewhere around 400,000 undocumented immigrants.
This means that if Trump wants to reach that “goal,” the administration needs to greatly step up its number of deportations. So in the summer of 2025, we learned how former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was pushing for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to own and operate its own fleet of airplanes for deportations, with the goal of doubling the number of people that can be deported each month.
In late 2025 we learned how this was coming to fruition, as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agreed to buy six Boeing 737-700s at a cost of $140 million, in order to increase deportation efforts. Interestingly, these planes were actually purchased from Avelo, which then ended its own deportation flying.
With Noem having been fired from her post and having been replaced by Markwayne Mullin, there has been the question of whether the “ICE Air” concept would still happen. We’ve now learned that this still is in the cards, and the plan is for the operation to launch by July 2027 at the latest.
The idea is that this operation would launch with six Boeing 737-700s and two Gulfstream G650ERs (referred to as C-37Bs in the government configuration), and that the fleet of planes would support deportation operations, emergency response missions, and high risk charter operations.
Currently, ICE charters 8-14 planes at a time for deportation flights, which allows for roughly 15,000 deportations per month. So by acquiring planes, ICE will be able to increase the number of people that it deports. As ICE increases the number of people it detains, more deportation flights are needed to avoid overcrowding in detention centers.
Of course buying aircraft requires a big investment, though Trump’s “big, beautiful bill” greatly increased funding for ICE. The bill gave ICE over $75 billion in funding, including $30 billion for deportation efforts, greatly increasing the previous $9.5 billion annual budget.
It’s suggested that the average deportation flight costs around $25,000 per hour, including the cost of the plane, pilots, flight attendants, security personnel, and medical personnel. So the average deportation trip cost is somewhere around $100,000 to $200,000.
Is there merit to the government starting this “airline?”
There’s no point in debating Trump’s deportation efforts, because we all have our own (typically strong) opinions on that, and I don’t think anyone is going to have their opinions changed in the comments section. So let’s stick to the aviation angle.
With that in mind, if the government is going to deport people, is it more beneficial to outsource the flying, or for the government to actually get into the “airline” business?
Here’s what makes this strange — at first, I assumed that this fleet of planes would be flown directly by the government, but the update is that the DHS is seeking contractors to actually operate these flights. The idea is that the contractors for this operation would provide the crews, including pilots and flight attendants, as well as security and medical personnel.
The DHS insists that having this “airline” will save taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars, but I’m struggling to understand where the efficiencies will come form, when you’re still hiring contractors to actually operate the flights with the government’s aircraft? Airlines are generally pretty efficient businesses, and it’s not like the margins they’re skimming on these charters are huge. I have to imagine that if the government gets involved, there’s some loss in efficiency, or at least not massive gains.
Also, it’s surprising to me how the belief is that the deportation effort bottleneck somehow comes down to lack of available aircraft that can be contracted. You’d think there would be endless spare capacity, as this provides a consistent income stream for a willing operator.
For that matter, by using charter operators, it’s easy enough to adjust capacity over time, to reflect demand, which is much harder to do if you actually buy planes. If we’re to believe that the undocumented immigration situation will change materially, and if our “borders are now closed,” then presumably at some point there would also be a decrease in the number of people who the government needs to deport?
Lastly, it’s worth noting that this isn’t the first “airline” that the US government is operating. The Justice Prisoner and Alien Transportation System (JPATS) is a United States Marshals Service airline that transports prisoners to and from various facilities within the United States. Oklahoma City Airport (OKC) even has a special terminal for prisoners.
Bottom line
The Trump administration is moving forward with plans to bring deportation flights in-house, by acquiring aircraft in order to ramp up deportation efforts. Currently, the government charters planes from airlines, but with increased funding for ICE, the plan is for the government to also fly its own planes. Specifically, the plan is for this “airline” to operate a fleet of Boeing 737-700s and Gulfstream G650ERs.
I’m not sure I really see huge efficiency gains here, since I question how much cheaper the government could run this operation, especially while still contracting out all the jobs to third parties. If this is really about not being able to get enough planes chartered from airlines, well, then I’d be a bit surprised. The claim is that this will save taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars, though I’d love to see a breakdown of that math…
What do you make of the ICE Air concept?
You refer to this as an “airline” and then proceed to talk about how it doesn’t make sense due to the margins.
Your entire premise is flawed. Just because the government buys planes and uses them for deportation doesn’t mean the government is starting an airline even if you put “airline” in quotation marks.
Your comparisons are not relevant and evaluating their proposal from a profit and loss perspective is irrelevant.
So is he gonna place his sk*nk - I mean wife - on it since she has entered the US illegally?
No, because she has an anchor baby with birthright citizenship.
No, because rules and rhetoric apply only to everyone else but Trump and his cronies.
You asked for the comments to be aviation-minded rather than political. How did that work out? Your material and expectations have badly deteriorated.
"So let's stick to the aviation angle."
*Ben throws a pebble into a river hoping to change the current*
Unless he is gonna start micro-managing each and every comment in each and every post, yeah, that was a mere suggestion, not a rule to be enforced.
And, to those who will blame one side or another... "Both sides, very fine people."
Guess there is no real travel news out there so we get political articles. Can get this stuff anywhere
Bill, you can just skip stuff you don't wanna see. No one forced you to comment either. You do you.
As a point of comparison, JANET uses government-owned planes but with contractor crews.
BEN, DIDN'T YOU SAY THERE WOULD BE A ZERO-TOLERANCE POLICY FOR RACISM? IF THAT IS THE POLICY, COULD YOU PLEASE ADDRESS THE BELOW COMMENT LEFT BY ONE OF THE USUAL RACISTS?
“hell it takes over $15,000 a year just to put a kid of one of those wetbacks in elementary school.”
Best airline in the world as far as I’m concerned.
The best way to prevent your country from turning into a shithole is to stop allowing people from shithole countries to come (and removing the ones who already have)
Not Turkish Airlines? (You know, since you’re based in Istanbul…)
Meanwhile over on Turkish OMAAT, they are complaining about the influx of low IQ bigots into their country - zero sum game.
But then where will Americans go??
G650?
They're going to deport people to India nonstop?
Or snatching people off a sovereign nation to a unreachable black sites.
Shouldn't we wait to hear what Senator McConnell thinks about the appropriations needed to fund this?
I just spoke with him for “20-minutes” … he said it was very hot down there and Reagan says hello.
I also spoke with Lindsey this morning… again, he said it was “reeeal haaawt” down there!!
It’s been interesting living long enough to see the left become the party of hate and violence.
Sel, D. ...holy projection, Batman! Convenient deflection from the actual, documented political violence from the far-right (J6, Pretti & Good, Hortmans, Charlottesville, and many more.)
Yet, this isn't even left-vs-right; it's recognizing that politicians like Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell have done far more harm than good to this country. They've enabled a drift toward authoritarianism, endless wars, and a regression from our ideals to the worst versions of ourselves, which, apparently, is something...
Sel, D. ...holy projection, Batman! Convenient deflection from the actual, documented political violence from the far-right (J6, Pretti & Good, Hortmans, Charlottesville, and many more.)
Yet, this isn't even left-vs-right; it's recognizing that politicians like Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell have done far more harm than good to this country. They've enabled a drift toward authoritarianism, endless wars, and a regression from our ideals to the worst versions of ourselves, which, apparently, is something you celebrate, sadly.
I do see a potential upside to the government owning the planes. It allows airlines to bid on these contracts without having to invest into aircraft. That might result in more bidders and better offers.
However I doubt considerable savings will be achieved when looking at the total cost. I could imagine that administering a rather niche fleet within ice comes with considerable administrative effort.
The jets were purchased on a use or loose end budget. FLOTUS declined use of Noem's Gulfstream. I would have as well. Eww
Was that the one with the Cory Screwhimdownski bed in the back?
Yes. And I m sure caught the latest Noem divorce dust up. Eww
Oh no! Not Kristi and Bryon! After 34 years? Those are gonna be some pretty big bras to fill… (you know, Byron’s…)
*Bryan’s (or, I should say, “Jason Jackson,” ya know, the ‘bimbo’ a pair of 38Ns.)
Polyamorous relationships are in new maga rules.
The party of “family values”… also, RIP Lindsey. And by “P”… I mean… #1. (Ahh…)
Which airline operator has "endless spare capacity"?
115 days until the midterms... if you can, maybe, like, vote for something better than this. (Or not, stay home, protest 'vote'... be the 'status quo' you want to see in the world.)
Long overdue. Can't the government just use the same planes that Biden used to take illegals all over the US ?
Sorry, those never existed, so, no, they can’t use imaginary planes. Boo-hoo.
Every criminal illegal alien deported from the US saves the government at least $300,000 in lifetime support. The faster we deport, the more money we save. Let’s roll!
No, immigrants on-average pay more into the system than take from it… ironically, if we wanted to make better financial sense, we’d be deporting ‘red’ states, because they are on-average net-takers.
Fun fact, the “illegals”, vast majority of which are good law abiding citizens embedded in their communities, paid about $100B in taxes last year.
Tho as a MAGA mouth breather you will prob not be able to comprehend that.
At a cost of about $150B, but as a cuck sheep liberal, you will prob not be able to comprehend that. Or you could just google it…
Sel, D., who cucks for Trump on here, nonstop, calling others cucks... oof, the projection!
Sel, D also unaware (typical low IQ MAGA incel) that’s a drop in the bucket relative to the Red taker states. Benefitting from government socialism even as they decry it. SAD AND VERY STUPID!
Even if that’s true (which it’s not) that’s less than $4,000 a year per illegal. Now let’s compare your figure to how much they cost…..hell it takes over $15,000 a year just to put a kid of one of those wetbacks in elementary school.
TrumpGambit, your math is wrong, because you're just making it up as you go along. Also, if you really feel that way, just go hard-r, so there's no thin-veil masking your bigotry.
(Again, my dude, you've said repeatedly that you're based in Istanbul, so why such focus on US domestic immigration policy on here; I can't gatekeep you, but, like, are you just trying to divide Americans from within? Clearly, Putin can't 'beat' us militarily, so... I see the strategy.)
The fallacy of your argument is based on the idea that LEGAL immigrants (and even citizens) wouldn't also pay the same $100B in payroll taxes, sales taxes, etc. when they did the same jobs instead.
Why is it so hard for people to accept that we benefit for immigration - LEGAL immigration - and we can expect people who want to come to the country to follow the rules to do so?
Also kind of...
The fallacy of your argument is based on the idea that LEGAL immigrants (and even citizens) wouldn't also pay the same $100B in payroll taxes, sales taxes, etc. when they did the same jobs instead.
Why is it so hard for people to accept that we benefit for immigration - LEGAL immigration - and we can expect people who want to come to the country to follow the rules to do so?
Also kind of judgemental to assume only "MAGA Mouth Breathers" want reasonable laws about immigration to be enforced.
@UA-NYC:
The fallacy of your argument is based on the idea that LEGAL immigrants (and even citizens) wouldn't also pay the same $100B in payroll taxes, sales taxes, etc. when they did the same jobs instead.
Why is it so hard for people to accept that we benefit for immigration - LEGAL immigration - and we can expect people who want to come to the country to follow the rules to do so?
Also kind...
@UA-NYC:
The fallacy of your argument is based on the idea that LEGAL immigrants (and even citizens) wouldn't also pay the same $100B in payroll taxes, sales taxes, etc. when they did the same jobs instead.
Why is it so hard for people to accept that we benefit for immigration - LEGAL immigration - and we can expect people who want to come to the country to follow the rules to do so?
Also kind of judgemental to assume only "MAGA Mouth Breathers" want reasonable laws about immigration to be enforced.
Danny, if you cared about ‘legal’ immigration, 1) your party wouldn’t have killed the bi-partisan reforms in 2024, 2) you wouldn’t support removal of protected status like the hundreds of thousands under TPS. Instead, let’s be clear, it’s not about economics or policy, it’s more likely animus towards brown people. Lest we forget, unless you’re a descendant of Native Americans, we’re all immigrants, here (in the US).
Danny, the truth is that MAGA gave up on sensible, bi-partisan immigration reforms in 2024, when Trump decided to kill that bill in order to run on scapegoating immigrants. I’d love to see actual reforms, because they’re sorely needed. The current system is largely broken, corrupted, and harming people, immigrants and citizens alike.
The "ice" airplanes are quite cold , with no heat , thus the name "ice" . Food is cold Jello .
Please stop voting for the morons running the party that has given the green light to billions of taxpayer dollars going to these crooks.
The crooks that have illegally entered our country to take billions of our tax dollars? Nobody denies this either - just look at NYC budgets alone.
They haven’t taken billions of your tax dollars. In fact, the majority of them put in more than they take out via taxes they pay.
NYC budget? The one our great mayor actually balanced? NYC ain't the problem.
NYC spent $9.6B (with a B) on illegal immigrants between FY23-26. Don’t look up!
Oh the naivety! Do you have the remotest clue why the “great mayor” of NYC could claim a balanced budget? Hint: restructuring city pension obligations accomplishes nothing but push NYC’s debt woes off into the future. But hey, as long as we don’t have to worry about it today, the problem magically doesn’t exist anymore (or so they claim)! And don’t even get me started on the billions of dollars of aid received from Albany....
Oh the naivety! Do you have the remotest clue why the “great mayor” of NYC could claim a balanced budget? Hint: restructuring city pension obligations accomplishes nothing but push NYC’s debt woes off into the future. But hey, as long as we don’t have to worry about it today, the problem magically doesn’t exist anymore (or so they claim)! And don’t even get me started on the billions of dollars of aid received from Albany. How’s that for NYC being a self-sufficient powerhouse?
Amethyst, you forgot the part where NYC essentially bankrolls the rest of the state.
You pretend to be an ‘expert’ on here, but I think you may be more of a walking-talking Dunning-Kruger effect.
Yes 1990libbot. $9.6B. Google it. Your feelings don’t trump facts.
But, but…you told me to not look it up. *wink*
Besides, shouldn’t we Bing-it? /s
Cheaper than contracting. Don't want to get deported? Come here legally. Notice how countries like China and Korea control their immigration.
“Notice how countries like China and Korea control their immigration.”
LOL!
You’re so much thicker than I previously thought.
Could you ask that question again just so I can LOL at it one more time?
No normal airline would operate these flights due to the protest arm of the left. In turn, massive tax expenditures with the same end result, except the big money is going to contractors instead of the big three, which would benefit customers and the unions alike. Good job guys!
And yes, while the border is “closed” for now, that is likely to change in 2 years…
So pointless to spend all that money only for the policy to likely end in a few years.
“The protest arm of the left”…you mean free market capitalism where, if one objects to the product or conduct of a company you vote with your wallet?
Funny how the same folks screeching about communism and socialism “taking over” because they watch too much Fox News are also the first to abandon capitalism when it doesn’t suit their fascist world view.
I dunno, Ben, maybe we should first figure out whether it was more "beneficial" for the SS to lease or buy land for its concentration camps?
As a descendent of holocaust victims, comparing lawful immigration enforcement to death camps is incredibly offensive and deplorable.
The christian fascist US government is placing families and children in camps in inhumane conditions. They have an offshore camp in El Salvador and Guantanamo Bay, where people are kept indefinitely. That’s deplorable and offensive.
They’d rather immediately deport them. They are only being held in facilities, many that were also used under left wing presidents, simply because of the never ending legal challenges from the left to not deport illegal aliens. Get a grip.
… except it is often not lawful. As a descendent of holocaust victims you would do well to be on the side of factual information, not propaganda.
Assuming they actually are what they claim, and not just using it to win an online argument.
You realize the death camps were "lawful" under Nazi Germany's regime right?