Etihad Airways has been on quite the expansion kick lately, as the airline is trying to grow its destinations at a record pace. We’ve seen the airline add quite a few new routes in recent months, though here’s perhaps the single most concentrated regional expansion we’ve seen.
In this post:
Etihad increases China from 28 to 35 weekly flights
Etihad Airways has announced plans to massively increase its China service, as the airline will go from seven weekly flights to one destination, to 35 weekly flights to six destinations. Etihad plans to launch the following five new routes from Abu Dhabi (AUH) to China, complementing existing 7x weekly flights to Beijing (PKX):
- As of October 1, 2026, Etihad will launch 7x weekly flights to Shanghai (PVG)
- As of March 4, 2027, Etihad will launch 7x weekly flights to Guangzhou (CAN)
- As of March 4, 2027, Etihad will launch 5x weekly flights to Hangzhou (HGH)
- As of March 5, 2027, Etihad will launch 4x weekly flights to Chengdu (TFU)
- As of March 7, 2027, Etihad will launch 5x weekly flights to Shenzhen (SZX)
The above is limited to mainland China, and doesn’t include services to Hong Kong (HKG) and Taipei (TPE).

All routes will be operated by Boeing 787-9s, featuring 290 seats, including 28 business class seats and 262 economy class seats. As it’s described, this new service “reflects the growing strategic importance of the UAE–China corridor, strengthening links across trade, tourism and investment, while positioning Abu Dhabi as a key gateway between China and markets across the Middle East, Africa, Europe and North America.”
The expanded network is intended to “significantly enhance the movement of passengers and goods between the two countries, while increasing access to China’s major commercial, industrial and technology centres.” All routes are part of Etihad’s joint venture with China Eastern, which provides coordinated services across key gateways, with China Eastern currently flying to the UAE from Shanghai (PVG), Kunming (KMG), and Xi’an (XIY).
Here’s how Etihad CEO Antonoaldo Neves describes this growth:
“China is a strategically important market for Etihad and a key pillar of our network growth. This expansion represents a significant increase in capacity and a clear signal of our long-term commitment to the market.”
“By adding five new destinations and increasing frequencies, we are strengthening connectivity across one of the world’s most important economic corridors. This will support growing demand for travel and trade, while creating new opportunities for cargo, business and tourism. At the same time, we are strengthening Abu Dhabi’s role as a key destination and gateway for travel and trade, supporting the emirate’s long-term economic ambitions.”

What’s driving this sudden expansion in China?
It’s interesting to see an airline go from one to six route to a country in a short period, and Etihad even describes this as one of its biggest single market increases in history. What’s driving this expansion, and to what extent does the Iran conflict factor into this growth?
First, we have seen a recent expansion of bilateral air rights between the United Arab Emirates and China, so the level of growth is only possible thanks to that (though prior to this, there were some bilateral slots not being utilized).
But I can’t help but find five new routes to one country to be quite the announcement. While Etihad is currently growing at a fast pace, most of that growth is with newly delivered Airbus A321LRs, so this added China service requires a lot of wide body capacity.
China is an international market that has cooled off considerably in recent years. International demand to and from China is down materially, and Chinese airlines have struggled to restore their pre-pandemic capacity. So yields on these routes are unlikely to be great.
I suspect that Etihad feels like it can get a leg-up over its two Gulf rivals in China, given that the airline otherwise doesn’t have any markets where its network is fully competitive with Emirates and Qatar.
I’m also curious to what extent the current conflict, and long term implications, might impact Etihad’s growth strategy. After all, adding long haul service to China will come at the expense of adding long haul service elsewhere.

Bottom line
Etihad is massively growing its service to mainland China, as the airline is going from one route to six routes, and from 7x weekly flights to 35x weekly flights. This is possible thanks to a boosted bilateral agreement between China and the UAE, plus it’s also a priority because of the China Eastern joint venture. Growing so much in China right now counters the industry trend, so I’m curious if the airline follows through on all of this as planned.
What do you make of Etihad adding so many China routes?
Well? Good for them .
Also Ben Schlapigg I think there needs to be an understanding that Chinese big three arent making profits because domestic competition with HSR. International Flights are the ones saving their asses if anything.
Also we are in BIG 2026. Not 2023. Travel has actually improved there at least to the country. Western world or more precisely "the USA" isnt the only country to exist. Not every country is fixated...
Well? Good for them .
Also Ben Schlapigg I think there needs to be an understanding that Chinese big three arent making profits because domestic competition with HSR. International Flights are the ones saving their asses if anything.
Also we are in BIG 2026. Not 2023. Travel has actually improved there at least to the country. Western world or more precisely "the USA" isnt the only country to exist. Not every country is fixated on "China bad" narrative as the USA is.
Etihad serves a massive cohort of Africans who dont have reservations really going anywhere at all.
As for as travel from China( Chinese tourists). That will come back to normal by 2027 I believe?.
Taiwan is a part of China. Whatever you say
I totally understand they need to time the arrivals and departure for connecting traffic via Abu Dhabi, but I'm still a bit surprised to see all of these flights involve the aircraft sitting on the ground in China for between 11 and 14 hours. Wasn't one of the key factors in their billion dollar losing past their terrible aircraft utilisation, and in particular many aircraft sitting in Asia racking up parking fees all day while...
I totally understand they need to time the arrivals and departure for connecting traffic via Abu Dhabi, but I'm still a bit surprised to see all of these flights involve the aircraft sitting on the ground in China for between 11 and 14 hours. Wasn't one of the key factors in their billion dollar losing past their terrible aircraft utilisation, and in particular many aircraft sitting in Asia racking up parking fees all day while not earning any revenue? Hope they're not slipping back to old mistakes
I disagree with your cooling off comment. I think the demand for outbound from China to many international destinations remains strong, but the return has cooled off.
Interesting that HK is not mentioned because the airline flies to both Guangzhou CAN and Shenzhen SZX. I wonder what the benefits with MU are and if it only applies to that airline or if it applies to all skyteam airlines as a passenger.
I was having the same thinking too before but holy shit I was wrong. I wrote another answer before this actually. But I didnt send that link.
This is Aussie situation only though.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/aussies-are-rushing-to-visit-china-but-the-love-is-not-being-returned/news-story/d642eb4611b163b50479fc5e50bda5c5&ved=2ahUKEwjDnvHirPSTAxWcja8BHaCuPJQQFnoECB4QAQ&usg=AOvVaw3NJzuGJvfg3QYCc2JsWWEB
This article is not relevant though to Etihad.
From the recent Simple flying video I saw of Etihad Beijing Abu dhabi flight I saw a load of Africans on that flight . This could be for them too.
I was having the same thinking too before but holy shit I was wrong. I wrote another answer before this actually. But I didnt send that link.
This is Aussie situation only though.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/aussies-are-rushing-to-visit-china-but-the-love-is-not-being-returned/news-story/d642eb4611b163b50479fc5e50bda5c5&ved=2ahUKEwjDnvHirPSTAxWcja8BHaCuPJQQFnoECB4QAQ&usg=AOvVaw3NJzuGJvfg3QYCc2JsWWEB
This article is not relevant though to Etihad.
From the recent Simple flying video I saw of Etihad Beijing Abu dhabi flight I saw a load of Africans on that flight . This could be for them too.
Expanding destinations in China .why bring Taiwan into this? They are two separate countries.
"The above is limited to mainland China, and doesn’t include services to Hong Kong (HKG) and Taipei (TPE)."
How is Taipei relevant here...? Unless the sentence came directly from EY's press release that was worded so as not to enrage Xi...
Taiwanese here. "One China" or not, Taiwan is often grouped with Hong Kong, Macau, and Mainland China as the "Greater China" area anyway.
Yes but if you read in Etihad website it is clearly mentioned "Mainland China". There is no Taiwan or HKG mentioned there.
So ? I dont get what Ben is thinking.
Although this was nicely timed with the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi's visit to China this week, it seems more like Etihad was backed into a corner and forced to fly their entitlements per the China/UAE air service agreement or risk losing them to Emirates. Emirates launched 7x/week to both HGH and SZX last year and made it no secret that that wanted more. They recently hinted that Etihad wasn't using a large chunk of...
Although this was nicely timed with the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi's visit to China this week, it seems more like Etihad was backed into a corner and forced to fly their entitlements per the China/UAE air service agreement or risk losing them to Emirates. Emirates launched 7x/week to both HGH and SZX last year and made it no secret that that wanted more. They recently hinted that Etihad wasn't using a large chunk of their entitlement so it should be given to Emirates who would provide more value. Etihad does poorly in China, so this level of expansion going to be a disaster from day one. The lack of network planning skills and just following in Emirates' footsteps is the most embarrassing of all this. I think Arik and Antonoaldo are starting to ruin their welcome and need to find another flag carrier to scam with their intrinsic lack of being able to run a sustainably profitable airline long-term.
Lool something tells you are Emirates propagandist
HOLY FOOK!!!
Chow Tai Fook? Great jewelry!
Lee Ho Fook. Out of business mediocre Chinese restaurant.
It wouldn't be a crazy idea if you had noticed how many Chinese are visiting the Gulf region for both business and personal reasons. However, whether that's going to continue or not, with the war in the Middle East, is anyone's guess.
I saw a massive Chinese tourist cohort in Ferrari world in Abu dhabi.
I'm not sure I understand Etihad's growth strategy these past couple of years. They recently massively downsized to become profitable after being loss-makers for years. Now, they are massively expanding again. Are they just making the same mistake, or are they truly a profitable company making sound business decisions? CLT (Charlotte) is my home airport and I'm thrilled that they are here. But, seriously, Charlotte? Right after they just expanded to ATL?!
typo here?
Etihad increases China from 28 to 35 weekly flights
shouldn't it be increase of 28 to 35?
Yeah, looking for this comment. I was confused for 10 seconds too.
More proof the world is shifting away from the land of Trumptards and Epstein
Hasan, is 'BZ' your handle for travel blogs? I donno, man, maybe Twitch is the better platform.
It doesn’t make any sense flying to HKG, CAN, and SZX at the same time. It’s like flying to JFK, EWR, and LGA at the same time.
Tell me your an American who has no geographic knowledge without telling me you’re an American with no geographic knowledge.
Actually, there are many airlines that fly to both EWR an JFK (British, Lufthansa, Air France, Emirates, Turkish etc...), and LGA as compariosn does not make sense. HKG to SZX is roughly same distance as JFK to EWR, and if you want to put third airport in, similar distance as SZX is to CAN, that would be Philadelphia, and British (LHR) and Air Lingus (DUB) are doing all 3 US airports
Also cosnider that this...
Actually, there are many airlines that fly to both EWR an JFK (British, Lufthansa, Air France, Emirates, Turkish etc...), and LGA as compariosn does not make sense. HKG to SZX is roughly same distance as JFK to EWR, and if you want to put third airport in, similar distance as SZX is to CAN, that would be Philadelphia, and British (LHR) and Air Lingus (DUB) are doing all 3 US airports
Also cosnider that this area (SZX,CAN, HGK) has huge population, much bigger than NYC + Philadelphia
Shanghai 24.85 million
Guangzhou 18.98 million
Hangzhou 12.52 million
Chengdu 21.47 million
Shenzhen 17.99 million
If even 1 percent of the population has some disposable income or a business need to fly to or through the Middle East, then the planes might be full.
Respectfully disagree, Creditian. And, saying this as an NYC resident. Like, I'm glad many international airlines fly to both EWR/JFK (LGA isn't for widebodies these days). So, please, EK, AF, LH, etc. come to both, come to all. It actually makes good sense.
Ah, shoot, shoulda read Kor's reply first. Kor gets it.
They are actually two different things. With the NYC situation, it is only one super city, but the HKG case, it is 3 super cities, though they are close to each other, there are many difficult barriers to cross. CAN is actually quite far away, it is only close to these two as high speed train connecting them. SZX and HKG have a border that many people requiring a visa to visit, so technically not...
They are actually two different things. With the NYC situation, it is only one super city, but the HKG case, it is 3 super cities, though they are close to each other, there are many difficult barriers to cross. CAN is actually quite far away, it is only close to these two as high speed train connecting them. SZX and HKG have a border that many people requiring a visa to visit, so technically not that easy. Even there are some visa free methods to cross, it takes way more time than you think.
They've flown to Shanghai and Guangzhou before... so more of a service resumption.
They may have flown to some of the others.. I cant remember. But Shanghai and Guangzhou are definitely resumptions.
Etihad loves saying they're starting service to all these new cities... when often it's just a resumption to a place they've already served. For example, they also just announced 'new' service to Dhaka.... while they've been in and out of that...
They've flown to Shanghai and Guangzhou before... so more of a service resumption.
They may have flown to some of the others.. I cant remember. But Shanghai and Guangzhou are definitely resumptions.
Etihad loves saying they're starting service to all these new cities... when often it's just a resumption to a place they've already served. For example, they also just announced 'new' service to Dhaka.... while they've been in and out of that market many times in the last 15 years.
I'd recommend not just taking what they say in their press releases and thinking a bit more critically.
Can definitely confirm, they last flew AUH-PVG back in 2024
Etihad also flew to Chengdu and stopped in early 2020.
Hard to take this seriously when Gulf carriers can't really operate properly right now.
A bigger announcement would be restoring full, stable service than this route expansion.
Yeah, for real, even the Chinese may not wanna get stuck in Abu Dhabi right now...