Mayday: Emirates Boeing 777 Pilots Declare Fuel Emergency In Miami

Fuel planning is an important part of the job that dispatchers and pilots perform before a flight can depart. It’s not just about having enough fuel to get to the destination, but also about having reserves if there’s bad weather enroute, if a diversion is needed, etc.

I tend to keep a closer eye on Miami International Airport (MIA) than most, given that it’s my home airport. Along those lines, the airport’s longest flight declared an emergency this morning, with some interesting circumstances…

Emirates 777 has fuel emergency after two go arounds

Emirates flight EK213 operates from Dubai (DXB) to Miami (MIA). The 7,845-mile flight is flown by a Boeing 777-300ER. Today, Sunday, May 17, 2026, the flight was scheduled to depart at 2:15AM local time and arrive at 10:00AM local time, with a total block time of 15hr45min (there’s a time change of eight hours).

This is a very long flight under normal circumstances. On top of that, at the moment, flights are in some cases taking detours to avoid certain airspace in the Middle East, potentially adding to flight time.

If you look at the Flightradar24 map for today’s flight, you might think this looks like any other Dubai to Miami flight. However, the flight ended up spending over 17hr15min in the air, to the point that the pilots had to declare an emergency.

Emirates flight EK213 Flightradar24 flight path

What exactly went wrong? Well, the plane started off making great time, and the flight took off at 1:47AM, a staggering 28 minutes ahead of the scheduled 2:15AM departure time. Obviously headwinds were especially strong today, because around 16 hours after takeoff, the plane only found itself over Orlando, still at its cruising altitude, but ready to start its approach.

Unfortunately weather in Miami wasn’t good at all this morning, so the plane first had to take a rather roundabout approach to runway 9.

Emirates flight EK213 Flightradar24 flight path

Unfortunately due to low visibility and wind shear, the plane had to perform a go around. At this point, the Emirates pilots requested to divert to Fort Lauderdale (FLL). However, the controller told them that the weather was still better for runway 12 at Miami. So the pilots informed the controller that they were declaring minimum fuel, and requested an approach for runway 12.

Unfortunately that approach also had to be called off at the last minute, because another aircraft was on the runway, and didn’t vacate it fast enough.

At this point, the pilots declared emergency fuel, which gives the plane top priority for landing. This included a “mayday, mayday, mayday” call, which is the most serious emergency a pilot can declare. The pilots finally managed to land on their third attempt.

They touched down at 11:08AM, over an hour after the scheduled arrival time, despite taking off from Dubai around half an hour early.

Emirates flight EK213 Flightradar24 flight path

You can listen to the air traffic control audio for yourself below.

Just how serious was this Emirates fuel emergency?

On the surface it’s a bit puzzling that this got to the point of being a fuel emergency. Obviously this is a long flight in the first place, but the fact that they declared low fuel after one go around, and a fuel emergency after two go arounds, suggests they burned more fuel enroute than they were expecting to. They only had a slight detour on the approach after passing Orlando, but nothing massive.

For those curious about how these terms are defined, according to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), here’s how minimum fuel is defined:

Indicates that an aircraft’s fuel supply has reached a state where, upon reaching the destination, it can accept little or no delay. This is not an emergency situation but merely indicates an emergency situation is possible should any undue delay occur.

Meanwhile here’s how emergency fuel is defined:

The point at which, in the judgment of the pilot-in-command, it is necessary to proceed directly to the airport of intended landing due to low fuel. Declaration of a fuel emergency is an explicit statement that priority handling by ATC is both required and expected.

For context, generally aircraft must carry enough fuel to reach their destination, navigate to a planned alternative airport, and then still have a “final reserve,” which typically has to be enough for around 45 minutes of flight time at a specific holding speed and altitude.

In this case, it was 20 minutes from when the first landing attempt was made, to when the pilots declared emergency fuel. So yeah, that suggests more fuel was burned up until that point than expected.

Bottom line

An Emirates Boeing 777 flying from Dubai to Miami today had a much longer than usual flight, which lasted a full 17hr16min, well over an hour longer than usual. It seems headwinds might’ve been stronger than planned, then there was a slight detour over the Atlantic, and then the plane had two go arounds, before successfully landing on the third attempt.

The pilots declared emergency fuel, which is a serious call to make, and gives the plane immediate landing priority (along with a lot of paperwork on the ground). One wonders with how much fuel the plane actually landed.

What do you make of this Emirates 777 emergency fuel situation?

Conversations (42)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

FlyerDon Guest

The crew was going to be out of duty time wherever they landed. They’re weren’t going to let some springtime TRWs keep them from landing in MIA.

0
‼ 0
Lars Guest

Monday morning quarterbacking, sure- but it seems to me if a pilot knows he's already burnt far more fuel than planned and is likely to face adverse conditions when trying to land, the only responsible thing to do is to add an impromptu tech stop. ATL would have been the place to do this. QR already operates there and it's roughly an hour out from MIA. No reason a current MIA weather report couldn't have been secured while near ATL. If there's any foreseeable scenario where available fuel could become an issue (multiple go-arounds, field closure due to storm, etc), put her down and fuel up! Yes, the airline may lose money on the flight by having two takeoffs instead of one. But it's still the only way to go.

0
‼ 0
Smokerr Guest

When you no longer have the reserves needed at your destination, it should be mandatory to land at the nearest your Aircraft type capable airport. In this case no latter than Orlando and probably Atlanta. They u knew they had used more fuel than planned and they knew the destination as well as the general area airports had weather. Clown show. We are this close, what could possibly go wrong, go wrong, go wrong

0
‼ 0
GLOLS Guest

I see many people here in the comments section have no clue how flight planning and dispatch work and also don't understand how inflight fuel management works. Fist thing to be considered: Did the weather forecast when they received their flight plan in DXB (usually 1-2h before EOBT) showed bad weather on their estimated arrival time in MIA? This definitely impacts the amount of fuel to be loaded. Was there bad weather forecasted? Did the dispatcher include extra fuel for that? If not, why? If yes, how much? Point number 2: The B77W definitely takes off at the Maximum Takeoff Weight from DXB to MIA. Bear in mind now in Mid-May temperatures are already mid to high thirties degrees Celsius in Dubai. This has a significant impact on airplane performance and consequently on payload. If the pilots wanted to carry more fuel than what was given by the dispatcher this means they would have to offload cargo and/or passengers. They need a very good reason for that since it impacts the profitability of the flight. Read point number one to understand if they had a good justification to load more fuel than what was given. Point number 3: The flight does not necessarily goes exactly as the flight plan. Pilots might not get the flight levels they want, which means higher fuel consumption. Sometimes you get it, sometimes you don't. We don't know if they managed to climb to their desired flight levels throughout the flight and how much this impacted the fuel consumption. Winds can also be stronger than forecasted which increases the flight time and consequently the consumption. We don't know if that was the case. These unpredicted situations make you burn any extra fuel you loaded and/or the contingency fuel. Point number 4: You don't just divert to "top off" somewhere unless you have a reason to do so. If your FMC is showing you are arriving at the destination above the planned required you don't divert. You continue until the destination and if the weather there is bad then you work your options: hold waiting for improvement, try to shoot an approach, or divert. How was the weather on arrival? Were other aircraft landing or only Emirates was the unlucky one? For what reason wouldn't they try an approach if they had the fuel for that and other aircraft apparently were landing? Point number 5: It seems their alternate was FLL, which is basically next to MIA, so less fuel is needed to be loaded compared to an alternate like MCO or TPA. Normally if bad weather like thunderstorms and so are affecting MIA it's quite likely it will also affect FLL. Why was FLL chosen as alternate? Read again point number one to understand if the weather forecast showed bad weather or not and the decision making behind the alternate/extra fuel to be loaded. Point number 6: When they did the first go around they immediately requested to alternate to FLL, which means that they basically only had fuel for one go around and alternate by the time they stared shooting the approach to MIA. Bear in mind they had a longer arrival routing for runway 09 probably due to weather, so it made them burn more fuel. Tower informed them the weather for runway 12 was better than FLL, so this impacted decision making. The pilots probably decided to cancel FLL as an alternate and use the fuel that would be used to go there to shoot a second approach to MIA, this time to runway 12. Murphy's law made the aircraft ahead of them not vacate in time and forced a second go around. A go around burns a lot of fuel. Two go arounds burn even more. Basically they had no more options. After the second go around they entered the final reserve fuel (which is 30min for commercial part 121 aircraft and not 45min as stated by Ben), so a mayday fuel was declared, they got priority and landed safely. Since a mayday was declared and they landed below the final reserve an investigation is needed and all those points I wrote above will be analyzed to understand how they got into that situation. Case closed.

3
‼ 0
Golfingboy Guest

I don’t believe final fuel reserves factor in go around. The reserves are intended for planes to have contingency if they need to enter a holding pattern or divert to an alternate airport. I think those are typically computed for 45 minutes of flying at 10K feet. When an aircraft has to go around they burn through the reserve much quicker. So they may have had 45 minutes of extra fuel when they began their approach into MIA but with 2x go arounds they burned through the extra fuel quicker. The real failure here is ATC did not appropriately plan sufficient approach separation or provide clear instructions to the aircraft in front to exit from the runway expeditiously.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published