American Flight Attendants Blast Management For Lack Of Performance

American just reported its Q1 2025 financial results, where we saw the airline lose $473 million, while both Delta and United reported significant profits for the same period. American’s flight attendant union is mad, which I don’t blame them for, but I do find the messaging to be a bit ironic.

American flight attendants want management accountability

The Association of Professional Flight Attendants (APFA), which represents American’s 28,000 flight attendants, has just sent out a memo about the company’s lackluster financial performance, as flagged by @xJonNYC. The union points out how the disparity in the company’s financial results raises concerns about American’s long term competitiveness, and management’s current decision making.

There’s mention of how one reason for American’s underperformance is the company’s failed sales and distribution strategy, which former Chief Commercial Officer Vasu Raja was behind. The union points out how he received a $969K lump sum payment after his severance period concluded and this “sends a troubling message to frontline workers and investors,” and that “while leadership decisions have led to real financial setbacks for our company, those responsible are walking away with generous compensation.”

The note concludes with the following:

It is time that American Airlines executives are held to the same performance standards as the Flight Attendants. American Flight Attendants are held to more than a dozen performance-based chargeable events daily. It is time that our executives are held to not only the same standard but a much higher one.

Today, we are calling on American Airlines’ leadership to right this ship — enough with the excuses. Fix the product in all cabins and staff your airplanes to be the global leader in aviation.

The path to once again becoming a world-class airline starts with prioritizing people and performance. Flight Attendants are ready to do our part — but we expect the same from those at the top.

I agree with American flight attendants, except…

I very much agree with the union’s intent here, which is simply that American is continuing to underperform its competitors, and there’s a lack of accountability for the management team responsible for these results, and that needs to change. Like, Robert Isom shouldn’t be making $30+ million per year for continuing to lead the company as it underperforms (conversely, spending a million bucks to get rid of Vasu Raja is the deal of the century).

Here’s the part that gets me. The union thinks that executives should be held to the same performance standards as flight attendants? That’s the benchmark?!? Arguably the problem with American’s management team is that they’re held to basically the same standards as flight attendants. They get paid as long as they show up, and the longer they’re there, the more money they make, regardless of the results they deliver.

Folks, I’m not at all anti-union, and I very much respect hardworking flight attendants. But the problem with service at American is that it’s consistently inconsistent, and if flight attendants do a good job, it’s just because that’s the type of person they are, rather than because there are any repercussions if they don’t… which sounds exactly like the performance standards with management!

The union’s motive here seems clear. The union claims that the way to restore American to its former glory is to increase flight attendant staffing, which of course increases union membership. But that seems to be the union’s only proposal, and what it views as the key to success. It goes without saying that good inflight service goes beyond the number of flight attendants…

The irony of these claims isn’t lost on me

Bottom line

American’s flight attendants are angry about the company’s financial underperformance, and lack of accountability for management. I totally agree with the union, and I think management should be held accountable more!

What I don’t agree with the union on is suggesting that flight attendants at the airline are an example of what accountability looks like, as if consistently great service is something that people expect on American. Quite to the contrary, I’d argue the inverse is true, and that management and flight attendant ranks suffer from the same issue, which is lack of accountability and lack of performance based promotion.

Again, that’s not intended to be a dig at American flight attendants. There are lots of hard working and friendly crews out there. But the good ones don’t act that way because they have some standards they have to live up to, but instead, they do it because they take pride in what they do.

What do you make of the union’s note about American’s performance?

Conversations (58)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Doug DUI Parker Guest

I'll never forget the first thing the first class AA FA told us before we got seated "I am not a maid". Like nobody asked you; just retire already if you hate your job so much but most lack the education and skillset to go anywhere else (also they wont be able to pull seniority at a new job).

0
‼ 0
The Real Vasu Raja Guest

entire senior frontline of AA is disgruntled and upset because they used to get paid more and do less in the pre-911 days. The pay cuts and sacrifices they made to not go bankrupt earlier only made management more emboldened to make worse decisions until the US Air/America West folks took over with their Spirit-like cost cutting while they doubled down on bad unions. It's the perfect storm of low morale, low pay, low skillset and low expectations all around waiting for the next bailout. Planes are expensive, so is the cost of living and the industry is such that rarely anyone improves just others (like AA) sink enough that United can actually look good without doing anything.

0
‼ 0
Justin Dev Guest

What I would like to understand is how BA can serve a full meal on an 60-90 minutes flight, while AA cannot on a 90-180 mins flight. Then there are reports of FA refusing to provide any service claiming there is turbulence when there is none.

0
‼ 0
Ken Guest

A lot of people criticize FAs for being lazy etc but isn't it a corporate culture that the leadership creates? Who wants to be extra nice at their work if the company doesn't pay much and doesn't care about them at all? There is just a limit to how much you want to try under this sort of condition... I am not trying to defend lazy FAs but I am not sure if I would have been able to be nice to everyone demanding all sorts of things when my bosses don't care about it ...

1
‼ 0
lasdiner Guest

Spot ON, Ben

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published