Ouch: American Boeing 787 Engine Ingests Cargo Container

Yesterday I wrote about a pretty costly mistake that happened while a heavy jet was taxiing. We now have video footage of the incident, and it gives us a clear sense of how this situation unfolded.

American Boeing 787 has ground incident in Chicago

This incident happened on the afternoon of Thursday, October 17, 2024, and was first flagged by @xJonNYC. It (indirectly) involves two aircraft, both of which were taxiing to Terminal 5 after completing international flights:

  • A six-year-old American Boeing 787-9 with the registration code N834AA, which had landed at the airport at 2:50PM, after operating a 7hr37min flight from London Heathrow (LHR)
  • A brand new Air France Airbus A350-900 with the registration code F-HUVG, which had landed at the airport at 2:49PM, after operating a 7hr53min flight from Paris Charles de Gaulle (CDG)

Long story short, while on a taxiway enroute to Terminal 5, the American 787 ingested a cargo container into its number two engine, causing damage to the aircraft. CCTV footage shows exactly how this played out.

There’s an airport vehicle service road connecting Terminal 5 to Terminal 3, which crosses the taxiway where the two jets were taxiing. Based on the video footage, it appears that both jets were temporarily not moving, and some vehicles decided to pass between them on the service road.

However, clearly the Air France A350 started to taxi again, and the jet blast from the engines sent one of the cargo containers flying.

It’ll be interesting to see what an investigation determines. Ultimately airport vehicles are supposed to operate around aircraft, and always err on the side of caution. It’s possible that the American pilot had “waved” for the ground workers to pass, but it’s up to the drivers to assess risks, as situations exactly like this can happen.

It remains to be seen if the Air France pilots applying more than the standard amount of thrust for taxiing somehow played into this as well.

As you can see below, @WindyCityDriver has some awesome insights on the situation, from the perspective of someone who has worked on the ramp.

VASAviation also has an excellent video about the incident, including the air traffic control audio.

The good news is that no one was injured, and it also appears that the container was empty at the time of the incident.

I’m curious how long this plane stays out of service

American states that this Boeing 787 has been taken out of service to be inspected. However, I imagine that more than just an inspection is required, as there’s visible damage to the engine.

Engines are the most expensive parts of aircraft, and they can cost tens of millions of dollars. I’m curious if this engine needs to be fully replaced, or if the blades are mostly fine, and it’s just the cowling with substantial damage. After all, the engines are pretty powerful, and can ingest quite some things without any major damage.

Regardless, given American’s shortage of wide body aircraft, this isn’t ideal. Then again, at least this is happening going into the winter season, rather than going into the peak summer season, where American desperately needs every one of its long haul aircraft.

Bottom line

On Thursday, an American Boeing 787 had a pretty unfortunate incident in Chicago, when a cargo container was sucked into an engine. This happened after a service vehicle passed between two heavy jets on a taxiway, and the jet blast from an Air France Airbus A350 caused the container to go flying. Of course it’s on the driver of vehicles to ensure that they operate safely around planes, and clearly that wasn’t happening here.

What do you make of this incident at O’Hare?

Conversations (44)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Trevor Robinson Guest

I see everyone writing things like AA doesn’t have enough aircraft and they need all the long haul aircraft they can get. There is a used market out there. If they are so desperate as many posters say then they can buy a few 767’s or 777’s and run them until they get their new planes. I don’t feel sorry for any airline that ditched their widebodys in fear of Covid—stupid stupid stupid I wish they woulda ditched the 737 instead

0
‼ 0
Trevor Robinson Guest

I will never trash talk a 787 again

0
‼ 0
Louis Spradlin Guest

Would it not be effective to have strong tie-down straps so the worst thing would be a trailer(s) blowing over and dragged along out of the way?

0
‼ 0
Tim Dunn Diamond

while the engine is clearly going to have to be overhauled, is there confirmation there was no damage to the fuselage.... SO...... when is AA going to get its next 787s and will they proportionately be as bad off as UA's 787 deliveries relative to orders? Supposedly the 777W conversions are also starting later than planned so maybe AA will have plenty of aircraft since they cancelled so many routes in order to free up capacity for those conversions...

0
‼ 0
D3kingg Guest

“Then again, at least this is happening going into the winter season, rather than going into the peak summer season, where American desperately needs every one of its long haul aircraft.“ Ben I’m sure it’s a major disruption as we are not at off peak season yet. Wonder how many passengers were rerouted or had their travel disrupted ? Glad I’m flying out of JFK to FCO and not ORD. Next , Air France owes American a new plane or that a350 should be seized by the FAA.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published