Alaska Wrongly Denies Family Boarding, Then Kicks Them Off Next Flight Over Seat Dispute

Alaska Wrongly Denies Family Boarding, Then Kicks Them Off Next Flight Over Seat Dispute

22

A family of four booked a ticket on Alaska Airlines, only to incorrectly be denied boarding due to the airline having some sort of a glitch in its system when it comes to visa requirements. They were rebooked, only to be downgraded, have similar issues on the next flight, and nearly miss their flight. But they didn’t miss it… instead, they were kicked off the plane by the purser, after another employee insisted they couldn’t have their assigned seats. Ouch.

Family removed from Alaska flight due to visa rule glitch

OMAAT reader Christophe just shared with me what happened to him, his wife, and their two young kids, while attempting to fly on June 23, 2026, on Alaska Airlines from Missoula (MSO) to Seattle (SEA) to Vancouver (YVR). They all have Swiss passports and are permanent residents of the United States, and travel to Canada multiple times per year. In this case they booked four first class tickets to see the World Cup game between Switzerland and Canada.

Since 2022, Canada hasn’t required permanent residents of the United States to get a visa for entry, regardless of their nationality. Christophe had traveled to Canada several times since that policy change, but just to be on the safe side, he even checked travel requirements in the Alaska app… which confirmed they wouldn’t need a visa.

The family shouldn’t have needed a visa, obviously

They tried to check in online, but couldn’t do so, as the system said a document check was required at the airport. Fair enough. They arrived at the airport with plenty of time, despite being in first class with no checked bags.

Christophe explains that the first agent who helped them seemed to be inexperienced, and struggled. Her system couldn’t recognize their passports, so she had to enter all the information manually. She then told them they needed a visa for Canada. So Christophe showed her the Alaska app, and even the Canada immigration website, which confirmed no visa was required.

Then a more senior employee showed up, who Christophe says immediately blamed them, and told them they didn’t have the correct documents. After playing with the system for a while, the agent finally called someone at Alaska in Seattle, at which point he found out the passengers were correct. Their boarding passes were issued, they breezed through security, and they arrived at the gate toward the end of boarding.

However, when boarding passes were scanned at the gate, there was still a warning in the system about how a visa was required, so they were pulled to the side. They once again called someone at Alaska in Seattle, who said the process was to essentially offload them from the plane, and then reissue the boarding passes.

Side note — as this happened, they saw their first class seats being given away to people on the upgrade list. Long story short, the process was manual and time consuming, and took so long that the flight left without them, as the captain said the flight had to be closed, so they were denied boarding.

They were then rebooked on an itinerary leaving almost six hours later, downgraded to coach. The agents claimed everything was solved, so they shouldn’t have any issues on their new itinerary. No compensation, meal voucher, etc., was offered, even though the travelers clearly did nothing wrong here.

Christophe also notes how one of the agents said to his colleague that this was finally done and “we can get all of these out of our face.” Christophe mentioned that he heard that, at which point the agent claimed he was referring to the old boarding passes. Either way, not very professional, especially when it’s the passengers who were most inconvenienced.

The travelers were denied boarding on their first flight

The same issue happened again, and then they were kicked off

Hours later they arrived back at the gate. They asked if they could board with first class (keep in mind they were downgraded), so that if there was again an issue with their travel documents, they’d have enough time to solve this. That request was denied, and they were told there would be no issues.

Well, when it came time to board, guess what? The system once again flagged them for not having visas. This time around that whole process of offloading and loading the passengers back onto the flight happened again, but the process took around 30 minutes, and during that time, they patiently stayed seated in the gate area.

The agents said all was good, and they were boarded without having their boarding passes scanned, to avoid that issue. They didn’t realize that in the process, the agents had changed their seats on them. This is where the story goes from bad to worse.

On the plane, Christophe claims there was an Alaska employee with her badge seated in the middle seat in row 10, seat 10B. Christophe’s wife had been assigned seat 10A, so asked to access her seat, but the employee declined, and called the purser instead, telling her that “you told me the three seats were empty,” or something along those lines. The purser instead instructed Christophe’s wife to take seat 9E, a middle seat a row up.

Christophe explains that this rubbed him the wrong way, after such a disastrous travel day, feeling like the purser was unfairly trying to keep a row of three seats for her friend, while pushing his wife into another middle seat.

At this point, the purser left, and then the more helpful of the two gate agents boarded the plane. Christophe says he expressed calmly the situation, and the agent apologized. He asked him to please record the names of the two employees, so that he could reference the situation in a complaint, and so there was a witness.

Another 10 minutes passed, at which point the gate agent came back and asked the family to deplane, stating he would explain the situation outside. Christophe says the gate agent was incredibly gracious, and explained that the purser said she felt uncomfortable with having them onboard the flight, and of course the captain sided with the purser. Christophe insists he didn’t raise his voice or anything else, and found the response extreme.

While the friendly agent tried to rebook them, at this point they declined, given that they figured the same isa issue would happen again on the next flight. They felt like Alaska just couldn’t take them to Canada. So within five minutes he bought a ticket on Delta, checked in online without issues, and boarded 30 minutes later. It did cost the family of four an extra $2,538, though.

The travelers were kicked off the flight the second time

This is shameful on Alaska’s part, on many levels

Christophe is a level-headed guy based on all my interactions with him, and I’m inclined to believe his version of events. As I see it, there are a few different issues here.

First — and this is something Alaska needs to fix ASAP — there’s clearly a system glitch the airline has when it comes to entry requirements for Canada for those who are permanent residents of the United States. Maybe this is somehow specific to Swiss nationals, for some reason, since I imagine if all permanent residents face this, it would’ve been fixed by now.

The airline needs to address this directly with Christophe and make things right, as he and his family were incorrectly denied boarding due to a system glitch on Alaska’s end. Period.

It’s disappointing that even with the rebooking, this exact same situation happened the next time around, despite reassurance that it wouldn’t. The ground staff should’ve proactively handled this, and for that matter, the request to board with first class shouldn’t have been too much to ask for in the case of downgraded passengers who had an ongoing issue.

Lastly, the fact that his family was literally kicked off the flight just adds insult to injury. Of course we can’t know for sure what exactly was going on here, but I can understand Christophe’s frustration when they were already inconvenienced so much, only to have someone block a passenger from getting to their seat because someone with an airline badge was promised an entire row of seats?

I hope both the purser and the passenger with the Alaska badge are called in to explain their actions. Quite frankly, Alaska is an airline that I typically find has among the best employees of any US airline, so I’m disappointed to hear this happening at the carrier, as I’d expect better from Alaska. Frankly, this sounds more like behavior I’d expect at a carrier like American.

Alaska’s a good airline, and I expect more from them

Bottom line

A family that booked first class tickets on Alaska to Canada had quite the travel experience. First they were denied boarding since Alaska has some system glitch whereby it seems to demand visas for at least some permanent residents of the United States traveling to Canada. They were unable to resolve that in time, causing them to be rebooked on the next flight, hours later.

That’s not the end of the drama, though. On the next flight, the same issue persisted, though they got onboard at the last minute… only to be kicked off after the purser felt “uncomfortable” with them, after someone with an Alaska badge reportedly refused to let them take their assigned seats, because she wanted a row to herself… or something.

No matter how you slice it, this sounds like a horrible travel experience.

What do you make of this bizarre Alaska travel experience?

Conversations (22)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Robert Fahr Guest

    Illustrates why the US needs EU 261 like protections. Secondly E gates are finally coming to the US. Incompetent or rude gate agents jobs are on borrowed time.

  2. Semperfix Guest

    Alaska will soon learn how to be 'adult' about this.

    I had AS/ QR via SEA a month after the started booking single tickets. The poor CSA had no idea what they were doing. It took me an hour and multiple calls to check in. I will give them credit, the CSA and station manager never lost their cool and were professional the whole way through.

  3. Steve Guest

    Ben, since you mentioned this is the kind of thing we expect with AA, I want to share a (rare) data point from last year.

    With a lap infant, we bought Canada to US tickets on AA via OTA (it was cheaper for some reason and still clearly indicated the lap infant).

    At the Canadian outstation (for AA), the system was having an issue with our reservation. Not immigration related, but probably something...

    Ben, since you mentioned this is the kind of thing we expect with AA, I want to share a (rare) data point from last year.

    With a lap infant, we bought Canada to US tickets on AA via OTA (it was cheaper for some reason and still clearly indicated the lap infant).

    At the Canadian outstation (for AA), the system was having an issue with our reservation. Not immigration related, but probably something strange with transborder flight, lap infant, etc. The AA agent spent about 20 minutes at the check in desk patiently figuring out a way to get our boarding passes issued. They never blamed us for booking with OTA and clearly took ownership of the issue as something she wants to help us with. She called multiple resources and eventually figured out how to work around it.

    While you know it's not the easiest to hang out in the terminal with an infant, the entire time I marveled at her patience and desire to get this resolved. Given it was AA, my partner and I were thinking in our heads the whole time we're just going to have to book another ticket.

  4. Mike Guest

    I was on the flight from Missoula, it was a crap show. Alaska wasted about an hour of our time just sitting on board, trying to figure it out. They made no announcements, and acted like nothing happened when it was over. The guy was obviously upset and did a great job keeping his composure. I feel bad for the kids who had their soccer team jerseys on and were ready to go.

  5. DS Guest

    Gosh, this sounds like a ridiculous and frustration situation. I’m appalled that an airline employee (with a visible badge no less) would refuse to get up and claim 3 seats. I’m an airline employee and this is wild behavior whether they were non-revving, deadheading or on official company business.

  6. Isaac Guest

    I am Canadian with US PR. THIS IS NUTS.....

    Any EU passport including CH(which is treated the same as the formal EU) should have allowed entry into Canada; WITH a valid ETA. This is similar to the ESTA coming to the EU and the UK/AU/NZ/US ETA systems.

    It seems here that the passport holders didnt want to hold a Canadian ETA because they were US permanent residents. Per CBSA, they didnt need one...

    I am Canadian with US PR. THIS IS NUTS.....

    Any EU passport including CH(which is treated the same as the formal EU) should have allowed entry into Canada; WITH a valid ETA. This is similar to the ESTA coming to the EU and the UK/AU/NZ/US ETA systems.

    It seems here that the passport holders didnt want to hold a Canadian ETA because they were US permanent residents. Per CBSA, they didnt need one as long as they brought their green card with them to prove PR status. It seems that is the case here.

    Alaska has had an incredible hard time adjusting to being a global carrier...this is another bit of turbulence in this adjustment.

    Although, i think some good advice was just to get the ETA for Canada....its only 7CAD per passenger(especially when they paid for F class)....this would have avoided the whole episode....not saying they were in the wrong...but i have gotten additional ETAs just to avoid any agent being wrong.....its a very small price to pay for smoother travels....it seems weird this is where they wanted to save money. They arent in the wrong here...but given money was no object here for WC tix and f class.....28CAD and a few minutes would have avoided this all.

    1. Moli from Earthyan Guest

      This seems like a very simple case of IDB. $900-2400 per person. Though him cancelling at the last minute might have invalidated his claim.

    2. S00 Guest

      The problem here was Canada used to required all US PRs to have a ETA for air arrival, however that only change not long ago.

    3. S00 Guest

      Also regarding your advice, IRCC's application questionnaire will not let you apply ETA if you told that questionnaire you have US PR status.

    4. Isaac Guest

      actually you can still get one per the application process.....its doesnt say you CANT have one....just that it isnt necessary.

    5. breathesrain Diamond

      that makes sense but I very much doubt the average traveler would go beyond "everywhere I checked says I don't need this document"

  7. Dave_Midnight Member

    We had a similar case last year with Air Canada and their check-in system.

    We were traveling from Frankfurt via Toronto to Los Angeles on Air Canada.
    My wife is Thai and has a 10 years VISA for Canada and another one for the USA.
    Online check-in didn't work, so we arrived early at the check-in counter.
    Were the staff couldn't check my wife in, as the system only allows one VISA...

    We had a similar case last year with Air Canada and their check-in system.

    We were traveling from Frankfurt via Toronto to Los Angeles on Air Canada.
    My wife is Thai and has a 10 years VISA for Canada and another one for the USA.
    Online check-in didn't work, so we arrived early at the check-in counter.
    Were the staff couldn't check my wife in, as the system only allows one VISA per person, but at the same time complains, that it needs one VISA for the Transit in Toronto and one for the Entry into the USA.
    It took them nearly 45 minutes to come up with a workaround. In the end they had to first check-in my wife for the Toronto-LA flight with her US-VISA and after that the could do the check-in for the first leg from Frankfurt to Toronto with her Canadian VISA.
    But the check-in staff nearly gave up, before they found the workaround and told us, that they might need to deny my wife for this flight.
    Unfortunately the same problem happened during boarding as the system again complained that something was wrong with the VISA. Lucky for us it was the same staff as during check-in and they new now what to do.

    It looks like nowadays the check-in staff doesn't have the flexibility or option to override system errors.

  8. betterbub Diamond

    From my experiences it really sounds like Alaska has serious problems with their internal systems

    1. 1990 Guest

      For real. Separate but related, at least AS added two-factor authentication recently to their program logins. Some folks were getting too-easily hacked before.

  9. S00 Guest

    Probably the system issue was stemmed to the days when Canada require ETA for US permeant resident to arrive by air. However, Canadian government did removed that requirement for US permeant residents and seems like Alaska Airlines forgot to change that.

  10. Ken Guest

    One of the few customer stories that sounds very genuine and I feel so bad for the family. I hope Alaska makes them whole. And US flight attendants should stop with their power trips. I bet the purser just wanted to punish them and knew he/she/it could

  11. 1990 Guest

    Christophe, sorry to hear of this. Hope you are able to get a full resolution. Between US IDB and Canada APPR rules, there really should be compensation owed to you and yours for this inconvenience and failure by the airline. *sigh*

    1. 1990 Guest

      A quick overview: DOT rules mandate cash compensation equal to 400% of the one-way fare, capped at $1,550 per passenger. For a family of four, that is $6,200 right off the bat. Under statutory protections, Alaska owes them the fare difference between the First Class ticket and the coach seat for that leg. Since Alaska ultimately failed to transport them to their destination and they had to cancel the remaining segment to fly Delta, they...

      A quick overview: DOT rules mandate cash compensation equal to 400% of the one-way fare, capped at $1,550 per passenger. For a family of four, that is $6,200 right off the bat. Under statutory protections, Alaska owes them the fare difference between the First Class ticket and the coach seat for that leg. Since Alaska ultimately failed to transport them to their destination and they had to cancel the remaining segment to fly Delta, they are legally entitled to a full cash refund of the unused portions of their Alaska tickets. Alaska is directly liable for the consequential damages caused by their erroneous document check and subsequent crew-instigated removal. A proper resolution must include a cash reimbursement for: The Delta Tickets: The passenger had to shell out $2,538 out of pocket to get to Vancouver because Alaska's station agents and crew created an un-flyable environment. Incidental Expenses: Any meals or airport expenses incurred during that six-hour ground delay in Missoula. Additionally, some corporate goodwill would be nice: On top of the legal cash refunds, a carrier looking to save face in a high-profile incident like this typically issues $500 to $1,000 per person in future flight credits (or a massive deposit of Mileage Plan miles—think 50,000 to 100,000 miles per passenger). File an official DOT Complaint: This forces Alaska’s legal and regulatory compliance team to respond formally within 30 days. The DOT strictly enforces IDB rules when an airline's internal documentation database is lagging behind actual immigration law.

    2. AeroB13a Guest

      An excellent travel agent’s synopsis and recommendations 1990, one is genuinely impressed.

    3. 1990 Guest

      Guest Aero, even if Christophe attempts all the above, the airline will likely fight him every step of the way. The best 'help' he is receiving right now is that Ben 'reported' on his plight. That may be even better for him than a mere months-long wait for the DOT to get back with a non-binding reply. I sincerely wish we had stronger passenger rights protections in the US, like Canada, EU and UK. Someday, maybe.

    4. AeroB13a Guest

      Right on Tommy …. :-)

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Dave_Midnight Member

We had a similar case last year with Air Canada and their check-in system. We were traveling from Frankfurt via Toronto to Los Angeles on Air Canada. My wife is Thai and has a 10 years VISA for Canada and another one for the USA. Online check-in didn't work, so we arrived early at the check-in counter. Were the staff couldn't check my wife in, as the system only allows one VISA per person, but at the same time complains, that it needs one VISA for the Transit in Toronto and one for the Entry into the USA. It took them nearly 45 minutes to come up with a workaround. In the end they had to first check-in my wife for the Toronto-LA flight with her US-VISA and after that the could do the check-in for the first leg from Frankfurt to Toronto with her Canadian VISA. But the check-in staff nearly gave up, before they found the workaround and told us, that they might need to deny my wife for this flight. Unfortunately the same problem happened during boarding as the system again complained that something was wrong with the VISA. Lucky for us it was the same staff as during check-in and they new now what to do. It looks like nowadays the check-in staff doesn't have the flexibility or option to override system errors.

2
1990 Guest

A quick overview: DOT rules mandate cash compensation equal to 400% of the one-way fare, capped at $1,550 per passenger. For a family of four, that is $6,200 right off the bat. Under statutory protections, Alaska owes them the fare difference between the First Class ticket and the coach seat for that leg. Since Alaska ultimately failed to transport them to their destination and they had to cancel the remaining segment to fly Delta, they are legally entitled to a full cash refund of the unused portions of their Alaska tickets. Alaska is directly liable for the consequential damages caused by their erroneous document check and subsequent crew-instigated removal. A proper resolution must include a cash reimbursement for: The Delta Tickets: The passenger had to shell out $2,538 out of pocket to get to Vancouver because Alaska's station agents and crew created an un-flyable environment. Incidental Expenses: Any meals or airport expenses incurred during that six-hour ground delay in Missoula. Additionally, some corporate goodwill would be nice: On top of the legal cash refunds, a carrier looking to save face in a high-profile incident like this typically issues $500 to $1,000 per person in future flight credits (or a massive deposit of Mileage Plan miles—think 50,000 to 100,000 miles per passenger). File an official DOT Complaint: This forces Alaska’s legal and regulatory compliance team to respond formally within 30 days. The DOT strictly enforces IDB rules when an airline's internal documentation database is lagging behind actual immigration law.

2
Mike Guest

I was on the flight from Missoula, it was a crap show. Alaska wasted about an hour of our time just sitting on board, trying to figure it out. They made no announcements, and acted like nothing happened when it was over. The guy was obviously upset and did a great job keeping his composure. I feel bad for the kids who had their soccer team jerseys on and were ready to go.

1
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published