Alaska Flight Attendant Power Trip: “Clash Of Personalities” Causes Family Removal From Flight

Yesterday I covered a bizarre story about a family being denied boarding on an Alaska Airlines flight, because the carrier’s system had the wrong visa requirements (which is embarrassing, but let’s ignore that for a moment). Then after being downgraded on the next flight, they ended up being removed at the request of the flight attendant. I won’t recap the whole thing, so please read that post first.

I’d like to provide an update on this situation, as we have both an eyewitness report and a report from a pilot on a subsequent flight, and I think this perfectly sums up everything that’s wrong with some employees at carriers in the United States, where they just completely lack the ability to deescalate a situation, and ego gets in the way of performing their job functions.

An Alaska flight attendant’s disappointing power trip

As I explained yesterday, a family of four had first class tickets on Alaska. They were then rebooked because they were denied boarding due to a system glitch, and were downgraded. When they tried to board that flight, they were told they couldn’t take their assigned seats, because someone with an Alaska badge reportedly claimed that the flight attendant had saved the entire row for her. This is ridiculous on so many levels.

When he expressed his frustration and asked for the name of both employees, the flight attendant responded by having him removed from the flight. As I mentioned yesterday, Christophe is a long time reader, and he has always struck me as being level headed, so I was inclined to believe him. That’s why I think it’s interesting to cover the updates here.

First of all, someone left the following comment on that post, explaining that he was also on the flight, and talks about how good of a job the passenger did maintaining his composure:

I was on the flight from Missoula, it was a crap show. Alaska wasted about an hour of our time just sitting on board, trying to figure it out. They made no announcements, and acted like nothing happened when it was over. The guy was obviously upset and did a great job keeping his composure. I feel bad for the kids who had their soccer team jerseys on and were ready to go.

But here’s the more interesting point. There’s a Reddit thread about this situation (based on my blog post), and one comment caught my attention. As I mentioned, after the second denied boarding, Alaska prepared to rebook the family a third time, but then Christophe just decided not to gamble with the same thing happening again, and instead, he just booked another ticket on Delta.

Well, the person who claims to be the first officer on the next flight from Missoula (MSO) to Seattle (SEA) wrote the following on Reddit:

Dang, I was the FO of the flight they were supposed to be rebooked on before they decided to take Delta. We were warned about their experience and were prepared to try to make things as pleasant as possible for them. We were told the passengers weren’t aggressive or anything, but there was a “clash of personalities” with the FA and them on the previous flight

Should a “clash of personalities” lead to a flight removal?

Some flight attendants really need to be reined in

I have a lot of respect for flight attendants at large, and I think a vast majority of them do their best, take care of customers, etc. However, the number of flight attendants who go on baseless power trips seems to be unique to the United States.

Passengers should be removed from a flight if they pose a threat to the safety of the flight, not because your personalities don’t necessarily jive. Accepting a passenger onto a flight isn’t like going on a date with them — your job is to just make sure you can transport them a distance of 389 miles without anything going wrong. That’s it. Nothing more.

Everything about this just strikes me as being completely unreasonable:

  • Christophe was traveling with his wife and two young children, and wasn’t drunk or aggressive; that’s not really the profile of someone who is most likely to cause a disturbance
  • Just look at the actual eyewitness report from another passenger, which confirms he wasn’t aggressive, but instead, was just (understandably) upset, as anyone would be
  • If Alaska was immediately willing to rebook them on the next available flight, then it’s pretty clear the airline didn’t actually have concerns about the safety of transporting him
  • The person who claims to be the first officer on the subsequent flight they were rebooked on even specifically noted how he wasn’t aggressive, but instead, there was a clash of personalities
  • Also, just as a human, how could the flight attendant do this to the man’s young kids, as I can only imagine how rough their travel day was

I just don’t understand why airlines tolerate this kind of behavior. It feels like sometimes flight attendants are coddled in the same way I have to coddle our three-year-old. Like yesterday morning at a breakfast buffet, we made him a waffle (at the make-your-own waffle station), and we put Nutella in a little dish next to it. He insisted he didn’t want one Nutella dish, but he wanted two. I told him he could have a second one once he finished the first one. A 15-minute standoff ensued.

But the thing is, he’s three years old. Presumably this flight attendant has a few years on him, even if she’s acting similarly.

This flight attendant sounds like she was on a power trip

Bottom line

A family had a pretty awful experience flying with Alaska Airlines. They were denied boarding from one flight due to a system glitch. They were downgraded on the next flight, only to then be told they couldn’t take their assigned seats, because an Alaska employee was “reserving” those seats.

When the father asked for the names of the employees so he could report them, the response was to kick the family off the flight. Everything about this narrative struck me as being accurate, given that Christophe is a level headed guy.

That’s now basically confirmed — another passenger confirms he didn’t lose his cool, and someone who claims to be the pilot on the subsequent flight had even been warned by the company to take care of him, and that he wasn’t aggressive, but instead, personalities just clashed.

I hope the flight attendant involved gets a good talking to, because this isn’t how customers should be treated, and it doesn’t at all align with what I consider the Alaska Airlines ethos to be.

What do you make of this situation, based on these reports?

Conversations (74)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Mike Guest

For FA in general....THEY FAIL. Gwad, i am so tired of American FAs all of them. Qatar Airways. Singapore Air, Philippines Air sooooo much better looking and performance.

0
‼ 0
Mike Guest

Well, the FA needs to be put back into training mode. Had I been there, I would have loudly told the FA, the pax was in the right.

0
‼ 0
Lieflat19 Diamond

Many flight attendants in the US think they are God's gift to the world and can do whatever they want. They treat people like crap, don't do anything on the flight other than the absolute bare minimum, and then constantly complain they aren't paid enough!

0
‼ 0
pat Guest

boycott those companies that don't appreciate good customers ...very simple you have the power use it

0
‼ 0
Ehud Gavron Guest

There are 56 comments before mine, and having read all of them --after all if I can't be bothered to read what others think and write why should anyone read what I write-- I have some input. Fortunately I was not on that flight nor on any other flight. My comments are my opinion. Ever since "Nine-Eleven" the magic words are either those in quotes or "Security." Even my bank won't talk to me without a Sir, Message, Sir: "Sir, for your security I need your social security number, Sir." For my security I don't give that out. Our quickly-created DHS and its parts including TSA (and CBP and ICE) are only too happy to use these excuses to perpetuate the entirely useless "security theater." In this case an entire family was IDBd, deplaned, downgraded, and generally treated like shit. I wish I could say it's this administration but [while this one is the worst since 2001] this has been going on since the inception of the three-letter agencies of nazis, hooligans, egomaniacs, and power trippers. FAs have always lusted after power and now they get to deplane whomever they [don't] like. There is no recourse. The customer has been paid to get fucked and the customer does get fucked and if the customer doesn't smile and say thank you, that's ALL they get... no flight... no refund... nothing but lies. This isn't an Alaska Problem nor an FA problem but more of a systemic problem where the magic words (in quotes above) trump any reason or common sense. It has never been acceptable, but in today's United States the culture is out of control. Time to ask: "What security are you talking about?" "How is my family endangering that security?" "Your attitude today suggests YOU get your bag and be replaced before this aircraft leaves. The captain will back me up." (and the Captain should... because sometimes the customer IS right and the employee attitude needs adjustment.) I've managed teams between 2-5 and 200-500 and it's a tough decision but if you can't make that decision, you're ineligible to fly Part-121 pax because you won't do the hard part of the job.

3
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published