Alaska & Korean Air Plan Codeshare Partnership: A Delta Betrayal, Or…?

Korean Air will be reinstating a codeshare agreement with one of its former partners, but not necessarily because it wants to…

Alaska & Korean Air restore codeshare agreement

Alaska Airlines and Korean Air have just filed with the Department of Transportation (DOT), requesting permission to launch a codeshare agreement (thanks to Steve for flagging this).

Alaska flies from Seattle (SEA) to Seoul Incheon (ICN), and the idea is that Alaska wants to codeshare on Korean Air’s flights from its Incheon hub to Bangkok (BKK), Busan (PUS), Delhi (DEL), Hanoi (HAN), Ho Chi Minh City (SGN), and Singapore (SIN). It seems this is a unilateral codeshare, so Korean Air will not be codesharing on any Alaska flights.

With a codeshare agreement, Alaska will be able to place its “code” on Korean Air flights between those cities. When it comes to airline partnerships, a codeshare agreement is more than an interline agreement, and less than a joint venture.

On the surface, this is a totally logical level of cooperation, and it’s a win-win. Alaska flies to Incheon, and presumably the routes on which it is requesting to codeshare are those with the highest passenger demand. So this will allow both airlines to fill seats on their respective flights.

Fair enough, right, so what’s the problem? Well…

Alaska plans to codeshare with Korean Air out of Incheon

What’s really driving this new codeshare agreement?

Delta and Korean Air have a transpacific joint venture, which is the closest level of cooperation you can have between airlines. Delta’s transpacific network is based so heavily around funneling passengers through the Incheon hub (though Delta is finally adding flights to other destinations in Asia).

Delta even owns a stake in Korean Air, and if we’re being honest, Delta is a very controlling airline partner. That’s understandable, because the airline has the clout to request that from its partners.

Alaska and Korean Air had a close partnership for many years, including a codeshare agreement, reciprocal points opportunities, etc. However, over the years, that was progressively scaled back. One would logically assume that Delta had a part in that, and pressured Korean Air to cut ties with Alaska, since Alaska will partner with just about anyone, as long as it’s a win-win.

Keep in mind that Delta has a special dislike for Alaska, given that it has been trying to grow in Seattle and go head-to-head against Alaska, but Alaska has stayed dominant. Delta is so used to going into markets and being number one, while the story has been a bit different in Seattle.

Delta wants to do everything it can to hurt Alaska, so why is this happening? Well, it appears that this isn’t so much voluntary on Korean Air’s part, but instead, it’s a remedy from the Korean Air and Asiana merger. With this, Korean Air had to agree to codeshare with competitors in markets that those competitors don’t serve. In other words, Korean Air is being forced into codesharing with Alaska on intra-Asia flights.

So while a codeshare agreement is happening, don’t expect any sort of restoration of loyalty program perks, since I can’t imagine that Korean Air actually wants this partnership (and it’s not required to restore loyalty perks).

For what it’s worth, Alaska is in oneworld, and hopes to join the transpacific joint venture with American and Japan Airlines. However, that doesn’t preclude a codeshare agreement, especially out of a hub without much oneworld service.

Delta has a joint venture with Korean Air, so this is interesting

Bottom line

Alaska and Korean Air have requested permission to launch a codeshare agreement, which really represents the restoration of such a partnership. The idea is that Alaska could place its code on Korean Air’s flights between Incheon and select destinations in Asia.

On the surface, this is a logical commercial agreement. The reason it’s a bit surprising is because this kind of an arrangement was cut some time back, and I have to imagine that Delta played a part in that. What’s really happening here is that this is a concession that Korean Air has to make as part of its merger with Asiana, to ensure competition.

What do you make of Alaska and Korean Air once again strengthening ties?

Conversations (50)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Brent Guest

Just a Korean Government requirement for the KE/OZ merger to go through.

0
‼ 0
S_LEE Diamond

I don't know if Ben will read this comment, but.. I wanted to share what I found about this matter. It really is a regulatory requirement. You can find it from the PDF press release of Korea Fair Trade Commission here : https://www.ftc.go.kr/eng/selectBbsNttView.do?key=563&bordCd=821&nttSn=13529 In [Appendix 4], it says: "Not reject the following requests of new entrants without good cause: - Transferring slots at foreign airports - Signing the Fare Combinability Agreement, Interline Agreement, Codeshare Agreement" It applies to 26 international routes, and Alaska is the remedy taker for ICN-SEA route. Therefore, Korean Air must not reject any codeshare request from them without a good reason. Other remedy takers include Air Premia(HNL), Virgin Atlantic(LHR), United(EWR), T'way(many European routes), etc., so technically they can all request codeshares with Korean Air. VS already have codeshares(they're SkyTeam anyway), and it remains to be seen if United will do so, too.

1
‼ 0
Steve_from_Seattle Platinum

Many commenters seem to think that KE is looking to code share with AS because of regulatory requirements around the acquisition of Asiana. However, while several other regulatory requirements of the deal are well documented, I can find no evidence of this online. If anyone has documentation, I would love to see it. I think it's far more logical that KE is just looking for more connecting traffic at ICN. This probably doesn't sit well with DL at all as it's likely to be very advantageous to AS and their SEA-ICN flights. As for its being advantageous to DL (because it takes regulatory eyes off of the TPAC JV), I don't buy it. The JV has been in effect for years--no one is going to cancel it if KE doesn't suddenly start codesharing with AS. The real question is what will happen to Asiana flights to the US once Asiana no longer exists. The merger DOES require no reduction in employment. KE is gaining Asiana's aircraft and crew, so where will they fly? Both carriers currently serve SEA-ICN. Will KE drop a daily flight if both flights are currently performing well? I doubt it. If true, that means AS isn't replacing Asiana but will continue to represent net new capacity. Despite the DL JV, DL frequent flyers historically have not had great benefits on KE. I suspect that's because DL doesn't treat its partners very well. So, it's entirely possible that part of KE's motivation to partner with AS is to stick it to DL, as Ben suggests. Whether that is actually true is less important than the reality that this helps DL's main rival at SEA tremendously if it gets approved. AS and subsidiaries already have double DL's market share at SEA, even after 10 years of DL's SEA hub. The bright spot for DL has been its dominance in international long hauls from SEA. Now that AS is flying similar services on its own metal, DL's one area of dominance at the airport is under serious threat.

0
‼ 0
David Guest

I wonder if the final integration of Asiana and the elimination of their flights caused this to come into play. Probably not, but it is something that from a timing aspect is interesting.

0
‼ 0
Gene Guest

Wow, finally, maybe so good AS news! My suspicion is that any J awards will be obscenely priced or on old crappy configurations. We'll see. Some F awards would be nice while that is still a thing.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published