It’s a fascinating time for the airline industry. For one, the impact of high jet fuel prices is causing all airlines to have to take drastic action. Beyond that, in the United States there’s the general belief that if there has ever been a time for industry consolidation, this is it, with Trump in power, particularly before the midterms.
So while this doesn’t quite get to that level, and while it’s also not surprising, there’s an interesting update when it comes to the partnership between Alaska Airlines and American Airlines.
In this post:
Alaska & American explore revenue sharing agreement
Bloomberg is reporting that Alaska and American are exploring expanding their partnership, to introduce revenue sharing on some flights. There’s also mention of how the two airlines briefly had discussions about the possibility of a merger, but that didn’t advance further.
For context, Alaska and American already have a partnership. Both airlines belong to the oneworld alliance, but they cooperate beyond that. They have a reciprocal frequent flyer agreement, offering upgrades and other perks for loyalty program members of both airlines.
Going back several years, American and Alaska were pursuing a partnership whereby American was building up a long haul presence in Seattle (SEA), which Alaska could feet into. The plan was for American to launch flights to Bangalore (BLR) and Shanghai (PVG), but that didn’t end up materializing. In the meantime, Alaska also acquired Hawaiian, and launched its own long haul flights.
So the suggestion is that the closer ties would come in the form of Alaska joining some of the oneworld long haul joint ventures. This includes the transpacific joint venture (with American and Japan Airlines) plus the transatlantic joint venture (with Aer Lingus, American, British Airways, Finnair, and Iberia).
With a joint venture, airlines can coordinate fares and schedules, and essentially act as one in a market. This isn’t actually a new concept, since Alaska’s interest in joining these joint ventures has been there since the airline announced plans to launch long haul flights.

Would a revenue sharing deal get government approval?
Honestly, nowadays who the heck knows what’s going on anymore, when the government is also nearing a deal to invest in Spirit Airlines, and turn that into a government owned carrier.
I think the first interesting thing to note is that it’s absolutely in American’s best interest for Alaska to join its long haul joint ventures. That might sound strange on the surface, since you typically don’t want another airline from “your” region belonging to the same joint venture, since they’re potentially cannibalizing “your” demand.
But logically, this also makes sense:
- American is the weakest of the “big three” US carriers when it comes to long haul service, and partnering with Alaska will allow it to expand the service offering somewhat, which is good; there’s also geographic upside, given American’s weakness on the West Coast, and in particular, in the Pacific Northwest
- From Alaska’s perspective, joining the long haul joint ventures would be hugely positive, given that this is where the big money is in terms of premium fares, corporate contracts, etc.
Changes to joint ventures do tend to lead to some regulatory scrutiny, since the goal is to maintain a balance between the various joint ventures. Often there have to be concessions for them to get approved, like giving up certain slots.
Alaska’s long haul growth aspirations aren’t that big — the airline wants to operate a dozen long haul routes out of Seattle by 2030, and that’s hardly huge. Then there’s Hawaiian, but I’d consider some transpacific service out of Honolulu (HNL) to be a value add for a joint venture.
When you look at the natural growth rate we’re seeing at Delta and United right now, adding Alaska to the joint venture would basically be like American just growing its long haul fleet by a couple of dozen planes, which is hardly anything major.

Bottom line
Reports suggest that Alaska and American briefly discussed the concept of a merger, but that went nowhere. However, the two airlines are pursuing a revenue sharing deal, whereby Alaska would possibly join some of American’s long haul joint ventures, including across the Atlantic and Pacific.
This has been floated in the past, but it seems like this is closer to becoming a reality. While this does require regulatory approval, and that sometimes requires concessions, I don’t see this as a huge ask, quite frankly, and I think consumers would benefit from this, given American’s weakness plus Alaska’s long haul growth.
What do you make of these revenue sharing rumors?
This is HORRIBLE news! I no longer am willing to fly on American Airlines after the past 4 years of HORRIBLE experiences. I absolutely love Alaska airlines and my last 2 flights with Alaska airlines were absolutely wonderful! If this happens, I am afraid that the foul practices in place at American, will infect Alaskan. Air travel is getting so much worse. We don't need bad businesses to ruin decent ones.
How on earth will the unions buy off on this (and yes, they have a say). What concessions would be needed?
No they don’t have any say just so you know they literally have no say in how the operation are handled out all they only got a say in working conditions and pay you’re talking from someone that works in the industry
alaska is really playing this merger/longhaul transformation thing expertly
Sleep with a dog (AA). Wake up with fleas (AS).
Any indication the Qantas/AA Australia/NZ JV would also be in their sights? Given HA's existing reach into Australia and Qantas' previous interest in Seattle flights this could be interesting.
You have to assume this revenue sharing attempt is a precursor to that. It was probably too difficult to figure out how to get Alaska into the JVs when you'd inevitably need to coordinate which passengers are better connecting in SEA vs ORD, DFW, etc. Not to mention how would AA and AS coordinate connecting fares at LAX with JV partners without coordinating revenue between themselves or else you'd basically have a JV roundtable of...
You have to assume this revenue sharing attempt is a precursor to that. It was probably too difficult to figure out how to get Alaska into the JVs when you'd inevitably need to coordinate which passengers are better connecting in SEA vs ORD, DFW, etc. Not to mention how would AA and AS coordinate connecting fares at LAX with JV partners without coordinating revenue between themselves or else you'd basically have a JV roundtable of (for example) QF trying to talk to AA and AS at the same time but separately to coordinate connecting fares. A SYD/MEL-SEA would definitely seem to be on the cards quickly from AS or QF if they ever joined the QF Joint Venture since SEA has so many unique connections in the PNW and Western Canada that AA could never duplicate.
Given that QF flies SYD-HNL already, it is inevitable that AS would join the AA/QF JV once these are done/approved. Whether QF or AS would fly SYD-SEA is TBD- I don't know how much premium leisure or business demand there is on either end.
If they keep offering cheap AS award redemptions on AA metal, I’m pleased.
But, I presume, their further coordination would eventually lead to monopolistic behavior, and those deals would disappear.
For those in-the-know… the practice of offering artificially low prices to eliminate competition and “corner a market,” only to raise prices later, is known as “predatory pricing.”
For the consumer, AS + AA would be bad. AS ATmos is, at most, superior to aany thing that AAdvantage haas.
Atmos sucks, people just haven't figured that out yet. Mileage Plan was far better three years ago before the greedy new CEO began destroying it.
ATMOS is amazing, just not for flights on Alaska itself lol. It's pretty horrible if you live in Seattle but great if you live in an AA hub.
Agreed with Max. I rarely fly Alaska; I do however abuse Atmos for AA flights outta NYC. Bah!
There’s no way this will be good for the public.
…long haul presence in Seattle (SEA), which Alaska could feet* into?
My favorite partnership; the current recip upgrades reminds me of the old Northwest / Continental days
@Ben--I like your take that this is good for American, if it happens. I would like to see AS admitted to the oneworld joint ventures. AS is launching a bunch of new long haul flights at a time that is fraught for the entire airline industry. However, I would HATE to see AS and AA merge. AA has a terrible reputation for bad management and bad customer service. Even at that, though, they are so...
@Ben--I like your take that this is good for American, if it happens. I would like to see AS admitted to the oneworld joint ventures. AS is launching a bunch of new long haul flights at a time that is fraught for the entire airline industry. However, I would HATE to see AS and AA merge. AA has a terrible reputation for bad management and bad customer service. Even at that, though, they are so much larger than AS that a "merger" is more likely to be a buyout in which AS completely disappears. Particularly here in the Northwest, that would be horrible for consumers. Even as a frequent flyer with AS, I try to avoid flying AA entirely.
Agree 100%! I’d be ok with the merger if AS management retains control, and Atmos becomes the new currency. Too bad that is a pipe dream :(
It's also just unrealistic for AS to operate long-haul flights from either SEA or HNL without being in the JVs given the pricing power, and of course both cities would still have meaningful competition via the DL and UA JVs, so it's easy to see why the government would be inclined to approve it.
An AA/AS merger would be the only M/A that would actually benefit consumers.
So I expect it not to happen.
Are you sure? Inherently, mergers, the consolidation of any market, tend not to benefit consumers, because less competition. Relatively silly things, like reciprocal lounge access, are not the substantive concern. It’s whether this creates a practical monopoly on certain markets, routes, etc.
@Will AA/AS merger would only benefit consumers if AS management runs the merged airline from SEA
Ben:
May want to edit this:
...which Alaska could feet into..." to change "feet" into "feed".