Airbus Jet Loses Three Windows After Takeoff For Bizarre Reason

Airbus Jet Loses Three Windows After Takeoff For Bizarre Reason

22

Several weeks ago, I wrote about how an Airbus jet mysteriously lost a few windows after takeoff, in what has to be one of the most bizarre incidents we’ve seen in quite some time. There’s an interesting update, as an investigation has now been performed into this incident. Let’s first cover the background, and then look at what investigators found.

Titan Airways A321LR returns to airport due to missing windows

As reported by The Aviation Herald, the British Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) has investigated an event that happened on October 4, 2023. It involves a roughly two year old Titan Airways Airbus A321LR with the registration code G-OATW.

For those not familiar, Titan Airways is a British charter airline with a fleet of Airbus A320-family aircraft. The airline operates flights for everything ranging from the British government, to Four Seasons. Actually, the jet involved in this incident was the one in the “TCS World Travel” livery, which operates all kinds of luxury travel journeys. I believe the aircraft has the below snazzy interior.

Anyway, the aircraft was scheduled to fly from London Stansted Airport (STN) to Orlando International Airport (MCO) with 20 people onboard, including three pilots, an engineer, a load master, six flight attendants, and nine passengers who were employees of the company. There were no “regular” passengers, as the jet was repositioning for its next contract. The aircraft departed runway 22, though after takeoff, the crew noticed excessive noise in the cabin.

So the decision was made to stop the climb at around 15,000 feet, and to return to the airport. The plane ended up landing back at Stansted Airport on the same runway, around 37 minutes after it departed.

The Titan Airways A321LR returned to London Stansted

Once back on the ground, it was discovered that three windows in the cabin were missing or loose. Furthermore, there was damage to the left hand stabilizer, as one of the windows that came loose hit the stabilizer.

Prior to this flight, the aircraft had been operating for the UK government for well over a year, with a different registration code. The plane had the registration code G-GBNI, and weeks earlier King Charles even flew on this exact plane.

That government contract was finally done, and from September 23 through October 2, 2023, the plane had been at London Southend Airport (SEN) for maintenance, repair, and overhaul, as the plane was being transfered from the UK government back to standard Titan Airways operations.

The plane lost windows due to a photoshoot

The AAIB has now published its findings regarding what caused this incident. As it turns out, the day before the flight, the aircraft had been used for filming on the ground. External lights had been used to shine through the cabin windows, to give the illusion of a surprise.

The lights were pointed in the direction of the right windows for a period of over five hours, with the lights pointed at the windows just behind the over wing exits. They were then pointed in the direction of the windows on the left for a period of around four hours.

The aircraft photoshoot that was going on

As it turns out, these lights were so powerful that the aircraft windows sustained thermal damage and distortion because of elevated temperatures. The lights were positioned closer than they should have been, many within a range of six to nine meters of the fuselage.

Distance of the lights to the aircraft

The investigation notes that this ended uneventfully because the damage was discovered at a low altitude, though “a different level of damage by the same means might have resulted in more serious consequences, especially if window integrity was lost at higher differential pressure.”

Damage to the windows of the aircraft

On the plus side, at least this issue wasn’t due to any shortcomings with maintenance. When we first heard of this incident, the story of British Airways flight 5390 came to mind. In 1990, a British Airways aircraft suffered an explosive decompression, whereby the windscreen panel separated from the aircraft frame, causing the captain to be partially ejected from the aircraft.

It was determined that the windscreen had been installed just 27 hours earlier, and 84 of the 90 bolts used to secure the windscreen were 0.026 inches too small in diameter.

That’s not what was going on here, though, and the whole incident was also a lot less dramatic.

Bottom line

An Airbus A321LR operated by Titan Airways was supposed to fly across the Atlantic recently, but ended up having to return to the airport due to excessive noise in the cabin. It was determined that three of the windows were either missing or loose, and one even hit the aircraft’s stabilizer. The plane had just completed a contract with the UK government, and was about to start flying some high-end charter contracts.

An investigation has now been performed, and as it turns out, this incident happened due to a photoshoot that took place the day before the flight. Some very strong lights were used, which caused damage to the windows. Investigators say that it’s a good thing this was discovered at a fairly low altitude, or else the outcome could have been much worse.

What do you make of this incident?

Conversations (22)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Peter Guest

    Lovely to see the jet parked at Nadi airport this morning

  2. Brianair Guest

    Why does this happen to every plane then since they get hours of direct exposure to the sun every day especially when they’re flying?

    1. Max Guest

      1 The sun is less powerful than multiple of these very powerful film set lights.
      2 The lights have been focused on the same spot for hours, won’t happen in the air like that.
      3 The air at flying altitude is cool and thanks to the airplane flying, heat is not accumulating.
      4 Most jets don’t have a black livery which exacerbated the issue for Titan Airways.

  3. Michael Guest

    So, what was the photo shoot for?

  4. Robert D Guest

    To give the illusion of a surprise?

    1. Lukas Diamond

      Yeah, I was wondering what that meant too.

    2. KingCharels Guest

      The windows fall out…SURPRISE!

  5. echino Diamond

    Am I the only one who thinks something must be very wrong with the way windows are built if they can be damaged by shining light on them?

    1. HM Guest

      You do realize that planes have lights on inside the cabins and they don’t effect the windows at all. Planes also stored in hangers or at airport gates have direct light shining on it with no problems at all.

      The logical conclusions is that some lights are hotter than others. So you should be able to connect the dots on your own

    2. Scott Mendelsohn Guest

      This.

      I read the report and looked at the specification sheet of the light fixture - each halogen lamp draws 1,000 watts and looking at the picture there are 12 per stand. That's a ton of heat (not to mention electricity). Curious why the didn't use an LED fixture which burn significantly cooler and use less power...perhaps it was a light color objective.

      Regardless this is a crazy story, thanks for sharing Ben!

  6. Anonymous Guest

    Similar photoshoot related melting incident happened to the first B787 of Turkish Airlines as well, I recall.

  7. Eskimo Guest

    Now I'm concerned about sunlight, heat affecting plane windows.

    All those planes stored in the desert.

    1. Darryl Stewart Guest

      The temperature output onto metal of these lights can easily be 4500-5000 Kelvin, not nearly as hot as the sun.

  8. Hank Tarn Guest

    This never happened with their 757s. Stronger, American and better built.

    1. Pudu Guest

      Oh give it a rest, Hank, you risible little halfwit.

    2. misterpoppins Member

      Yes, American planes are immune to thermodynamics *rolls eyes*

    3. Neal Guest

      It never happened with the Spirit of St. Louis either. They just don't build them like they used to.

  9. MildMidwesterner Diamond

    I'm glad the investigators were able to shed some light on the cause.

    1. Honkbert Gold

      Logged in only to give this one a Like.

  10. Darryl Stewart Guest

    What absolute idiotic dinks. I trust prison time shall be sentenced to those involved with this recklessness.

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

MildMidwesterner Diamond

I'm glad the investigators were able to shed some light on the cause.

12
KingCharels Guest

The windows fall out…SURPRISE!

2
HM Guest

You do realize that planes have lights on inside the cabins and they don’t effect the windows at all. Planes also stored in hangers or at airport gates have direct light shining on it with no problems at all. The logical conclusions is that some lights are hotter than others. So you should be able to connect the dots on your own

2
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,163,247 Miles Traveled

32,614,600 Words Written

35,045 Posts Published