Trump Appointee Bryan Bedford Becomes New FAA Administrator

We now have a new head of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which I’d consider to be good news, as there’s lots of work to be done.

Senate confirms Bryan Bedford as FAA Administrator

In March 2025, President Trump nominated Bryan Bedford as the new FAA Administrator. He has today been confirmed by the Senate, in a 53-43 vote, so he’ll now serve a five-year term.

For some background, while the term for the FAA Administrator usually lasts for five years, previous Administrator Mike Whitaker resigned on January 20, 2025, the same day that Trump took office. He had only assumed the role in late 2023, and clearly left (or was pushed out) for political reasons. Historically, the position of FAA Administrator had been pretty insulated from partisan politics, but I guess that changed.

Bedford has been in the industry for a long time, with over 30 years of experience. He had been CEO at Republic Airways for over 25 years, since 1999, before resigning several weeks back, presumably in anticipation of this job. For those not familiar, Republic is a regional airline, which operates flights on behalf of the “big three” US carriers.

While not of any consequence (at least to me), in 2010, Bedford was CEO of Frontier Airlines (when Republic purchased Frontier in bankruptcy), and appeared on Undercover Boss. Perhaps his reality TV experience was another reason he connected with Trump.

Why Bedford has proven to be a controversial pick

As mentioned above, historically the role of FAA Administrator hasn’t been partisan. For example, Biden’s appointee was confirmed by the Senate in a 98-0 vote. So by comparison, the 53-43 vote is much more partisan than we’re used to for this position.

On one end of the spectrum, you have some Republican Senators praising him for being an accomplished aviation leader who will bring expertise and common sense to his role…

…and on the other end of the spectrum, you have some Democratic Senators claiming he won’t put the safety of airline passengers over profits, and has shown a callous disregard for safety protocols.

The main controversy surrounding Bedford has involved his opposition to the 1,500-hour pilot rule, as he pushed for that to be eased while CEO of Republic. This has made him quite unpopular with pilots and the unions representing pilots, since it’s in their best interest to keep the requirements to be pilots high, so they can negotiate better contracts.

Personally, I’m with Bedford on this. In my opinion, the 1,500-hour rule was a bizarre response to the 2009 Colgan Air crash, where both pilots actually had more than 1,500 hours of experience. I also haven’t seen any data to show that the 1,500-hour rule makes our skies safer.

Pilots all over Europe get into flight decks with a lot fewer hours than that, and I don’t think anyone can argue that European skies are somehow less safe than American skies (though if there’s any data I’m missing, I’m always open to evolving!). Anyway, that’s neither here nor there.

I’m just happy to see that there’s once again someone leading the FAA, because this is a time where we need leadership for our aviation ecosystem. In theory, we’re supposed to see a modernization of our air traffic control system, and having an actual person leading the FAA is a key piece to that puzzle.

So congrats to Bedford, and as has been the precedent with FAA Administrators for decades, I hope he can be bipartisan and work toward solutions that make our air travel as safe and smooth as possible.

Bottom line

Bryan Bedford has been confirmed as the new FAA Administrator, after a 53-43 Senate vote. Trump’s pick will now serve a five-year term, and certainly has his work cut out for him. He has proven to be a controversial pick, mainly due to his take opposition to the 1,500-hour rule. I’m happy to see that we once again have someone leading the FAA, since that kind of seems like an important job.

What do you make of Bedford becoming the new FAA Administrator?

Conversations (32)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

globetrotter Guest

Brooke Rollins? I did not know such cabinet member until I looked her up now. She is Agriculture Secretary whose background is in law who worked under Rick Perry. I read about Rick Perry when he was on "Dancing with the stars" ( I never watched the show but read about it) and who acknowledged that he did not know nuclear arsenals were in the jurisdiction of Energy Dept. Absolutely a qualified candidate for the position. I am not aware of any Trump's cabinet members who are qualified to lead the departments they were nominated for. Most of all, I have beef with lawyers who make the final decisions in critical areas they have no background in. Namely all Supreme Court justices who overrule decisions made by those who spent their lifetime working in specific fields, such as healthcare, labor, economic, etc...

0
‼ 0
BB Guest

Another monster on the Epstein list in a position of power. USA has fallen to fascism.

1
‼ 0
digital_notmad Diamond

the 1500 hour rule is indeed trash as policy but hardly the most pressing issue facing the US aviation sector, and on more crucial matters like air travel safety where this administration has suffered so many setbacks and is struggling desperately, it sure seems that Bedford doesn't have the stuff to turn the ship (plane) around.

0
‼ 0
CanadianGoose Guest

" I also haven’t seen any data to show that the 1,500-hour rule makes our skies safer." What a fallacy. Do you have data that proves the opposite? Why do you advocate for lower minimums when it has ZERO impact on you personally? There is no more pilot shortage. Would a crew paycut finally make you and Gary Leff shutup about this topic (that you have no experience in)?

0
‼ 0
Alex Guest

"I also haven’t seen any data to show that the 1,500-hour rule makes our skies safer..." ...Sounds a bit like "I also haven't seen any data to show that keeping the driving limit over 16 years old makes our roads safer".

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published