Air Canada Makes Ba...
 

Air Canada Makes Basic Fares More Restrictive, Cuts Carry-Ons

18 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
513 Views
Posts: 40393
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#17252]
wpf-cross-image

Air Canada has announced plans to make its basic economy fares more restrictive as of 2025, and it will have major implications for passengers.

Continue reading: Air Canada Makes Basic Fares More Restrictive, Cuts Carry-Ons

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


17 Replies
17 Replies
Gold
(@bobby-j)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 77

I thought United's joint venture with Air Canada was only as part of the transatlantic JV with Lufthansa/Swiss/Brussels/Austrian and specifically not cross-border US-Canada? Has that changed?


Reply
(@Jane Ford)
Joined: 2 years ago

Posts: 13

Nuts. Once again, taking away what used to be just normal courtesy to the flying public, such as one or two check-in bags, 1 carryon and a personal item. I realize the cost of everything has gone up in the past 30-40 years, but to be punitive to the point of punishing the pax because he or she might want a different seat in the SAME CLASS OF SERVICE at time of check-in is ridiculous. I have no need to fly Canadian Airways, but even if I did, I'd find another airline. However, what this does is SET THE PRECEDENT for ALL OTHER AIRLINES to follow suit. Thanks for punishing EVERYONE because of greed. For sure you lost a possible customer and I'll tell 10 others to not fly Canadian Airways. Maybe if everyone did that (as possibly feasible), you'd lose money. Making money hand over fist and STILL GREEDY! Horrendous. No thanks!


Reply
(@Richard)
Joined: 2 years ago

Posts: 3

oh good maybe now more than 50% of the planes will be on time... lol.. who are we kidding... garbage airline


Reply
 Mark
(@Mark)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 46

I wish all the fare aggregation websites like Kayak and Google Flights would do better at allowing non-basic economy searches. You search for what looks like a good price, then you find out it’s likely to be a middle seat next to the lavatory, with an extra $80 fee if you want to bring some clothes with you. I’d rather search for the lowest price for a regular economy seat, and I wish all the seat-swap beggars could make that search too.


Reply
(@HkCaGu)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 77

But UA BE crossing US-Can allows carryon.


Reply
 Jake
(@Jake)
Joined: 16 years ago

Posts: 135

Couldn't agree more. They are failing us.


Reply
(@bossa)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 551

If AC was truly competitive from a consumer's point of view, they'd leave well enough alone & market these features as unique, compared to its competitors.
These companies operate in virtual lock-step, monkey-see-monkey do and I don't even view them as truly 'competing' with one another in various aspects.
But, then again, they aren't charities and their supreme obligation (above God & country) is to their share holders & board of directors, exclusively....
PS-Maybe this decision was a result of a survey/feedback from their 'most valued' Basic Economy pax !


Reply
(@Derek H)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 21

Far from a shock from one of the worst airlines in the world. The government has protected them far too long, and they've become far too greedy.

I can't recall the last thing Air Canada did right...genuinely.


Reply
 Sam
(@Sam)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 184

You can on google flights. There's a drop down menu for carry on baggage. If you choose one bag, it will eliminate basic economy fares that don't include a full size carry on.


Reply
 Jams
(@Jams)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 379

I like the fact Air Canada serves free wine in economy on US routes. Thumbs up from me.


Reply
(@brutus)
Joined: 2 years ago

Member
Posts: 66

Then you would like Porter even better, they serve free wine in economy on intra-Canada flights (except short sectors and night flights).


Reply
(@brutus)
Joined: 2 years ago

Member
Posts: 66

True, Air Canada is certainly not an airline that woes customers with their service, but they run with the (North American) pack and are prodded by what the competition can get away with.

I find the inflight part, again by North american standards, not too bad, but it is the ground part that shows how disgruntled and/or overworked their ground staff seems to be.

The race to the bottom continues…

B.


Reply
Gold
(@gideyup11)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Aligning Basic Economy to Porter /WestJet / United is fine and dandy, but AC's standard economy fares is not competitive vs. UA and other US airlines. AC's standard economy fares charges for seat selection, and does NOT have free changes, cancel for travel credit. If UA/DL/AA/B6 can offer free seat selection and free change/cancel on their standard coach fare, why can't Air Canada??


Reply
(@Marco)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 99

That is an excellent point - one that most (even the best travel bloggers) tend to overlook.


Reply
(@Marco)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 99

The new carry-on restriction for Basic Economy is an excellent move on the part of Air Canada, and will align the carrier not only with its domestic competitors, but also with alliance partner United Airlines.

It is the last fraction of the overhead bin scrounge that delays flights, so this change should have a tangibly positive effect on orderly and timely departures on ACA flights going forward.


Reply
Gold
(@gideyup11)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I've also thought it strange that most bloggers including Ben overlook this point. Not being able to select free seats ($30-$45 CAD for a regular coach seat 🙁 ) even in standard coach fare or be able to change/cancel for credit is a huge disadvantage vs. US airlines. Recently, I booked EWR-YYC, YYZ-EWR, and LGA-YYZ tickets on AC metal thru United.com as a codeshare. Same fare, but booking thru United I'm able to get free changes/cancellations. Really stupid on AC's part to not align fare rules with United.


Reply
(@CopperLady)
Joined: 2 years ago

Posts: 1

With these kinds of restrictions, I'd rather change planes and stay on a US carrier. Air Canada (and others) is shooting themselves in the foot.


Reply