Traveler Forced To Buy New Ticket After Missing Flight Due To Long Security Line

An OMAAT reader asked me about a situation he faced where he missed a flight due to excessively long security lines, only to then be forced to buy a new ticket. Is there really no recourse in these situations?! Let’s take a look.

Long Lisbon security lines cause missed TAP flight

An OMAAT reader shared the following experience with me, about a recent transit at Lisbon’s Humberto Delgado Airport (LIS):

I wanted to share an interesting thing that recently happened to me at the Lisbon Airport. I’m not sure if I did something wrong, TAP did something wrong, or it’s just an unfortunate situation, but considering how regulated European aviation is, I feel like I’ve been wronged.

On 26-MAR I was flying BRU-LIS-RAK on a business class fare paid in cash. My fiancee was traveling on the same flights, in the same class, on an Aeroplan award. The BRU-LIS flight on Thursday even went off without a hitch. We had an overnight layover in Lisbon.

The following morning, our scheduled departure time to Marrakech was 9:20, and we arrived at the airport at about 7:00 AM, a little over 2h before departure. We had boarding passes in hand, no checked baggage, and proceeded to fast track security, which we quickly cleared without incident.

Monitors were showing a 28 minute wait for non-EU passports, so we went straight to passport control. We were greeted with a massive, loud, and somewhat disorderly crowd. We assumed we’d be in line for a half hour, as advertised, but a half hour turned to an hour, which turned to 90 minutes, which became two hours…

As we sat in line, on several occasions we attempted to get the attention of airport staff to tell them of our approaching departure. We actually managed to team up with 7 other passengers on the flight, but they refused to let anyone move to the front of the queue (which in a sense I appreciate), until about 10 minutes before departure. At 9:10 we were stamped out of Portugal and ran to the departure gate only to see that it had been closed. About 5 minutes before departure time.

As we missed the flight, we were directed to exit the terminal and go to the ticket counter. The only accommodation TAP offered me, a paid business class passenger, was to purchase another ticket and fly out two days later. I wound up booking an EasyJet flight out later that afternoon and made it to RAK.

Coincidentally, the next TAP flight arrived 5 minutes before my EasyJet flight later that afternoon, and I saw several of the passengers that I met in the immigration line. The only option they were given was also to pay cash for a new ticket, and although they were all originally ticketed in economy, TAP only offered them business class tickets.

Look, I understand it’s the passenger’s responsibility to show up early enough, and the airline has no control over immigration. My question is, what is reasonable? I was at the airport over 2h before departure and went to the immigration line as quickly as possible. Clearly there is an issue in LIS because as I stated, 7 other passengers from my flight faced the same fate. Is there really nothing in TAP terms or EU regs that doesn’t require rebooking in a situation like this? US carriers have many deficiencies, but I’m certain I would have been rebooked in a similar situation.

The ticket agent told me I should have shown up earlier. I understand that in this isolated incident, but it just seems very unreasonable and very customer unfriendly.

Am I the one who is in the wrong here? I feel like I’m owed something, but I also understand the one-sided nature of contracts of carriage.

Anyway, I just thought I’d share. I guess maybe show up 5h early if you’re flying out of LIS in the morning.

The traveler missed his flight due to long security lines

Is there any recourse in a situation like this?

When I hear of people missing flights due to long security lines, it’s often because they didn’t plan sufficiently, and were unrealistic. For example, if you show up at the airport 40 minutes before departure and then miss your flight due to long security lines, it’s hard to feel too bad.

However, that’s not at all what happened here. The traveler showed up over two hours before departure with just carry-on bags, and that’s as early as anyone could possibly expect to arrive at the airport for a flight, short of some extraordinary event that the airline warned people about.

I don’t know what happened here that caused these long lines, but this definitely seems out of the ordinary, and not like something that’s acceptable. If these lines are going to be so bad, it also seems like the airline should’ve warned people in advance of the possibility of that.

I think that also leads to the frustrating lack of accountability here. Admittedly an airline can’t be responsible for long security lines, so the airline wouldn’t be on the hook for paying for things like EC261 compensation, since this is fully outside of a carrier’s control.

However, both the airline and airport are run by the government, and as I see it, the real issue here is how European airlines generally have a policy that if you miss a flight, you have to pay for a new ticket.

It seems borderline unethical for a carrier’s hub airport to have unacceptably long security lines, and for the airline to then charge passengers to rebook if they miss their flight. It’s one of the ways that aviation in Europe is very punitive, as it’s not like the United States, where you’re typically just put on standby for the next flight if you miss the one you’re booked on.

I totally agree with this reader that he didn’t do anything wrong, and it’s not unreasonable that he feels he’s owed something. As he concludes, though, he’s correct that this is one of those situations that reflects just how one-sided airline contracts of carriage are.

Airlines are rarely generous beyond their published contract of carriage, especially for customer service after the fact. So this might be one of those rare situations where I’m not sure there’s any good recourse, I don’t have any advice, and I also am not sure what the lesson is. I certainly wouldn’t recommend showing up well over two hours early for a typical flight from Europe, unless there are exceptional circumstances.

So do we just put this in the category of “if you travel enough things sometimes go wrong, and there’s nothing we can do about it?” Or is there another lesson?

I’d be frustrated if I were this passenger as well

Bottom line

A TAP Air Portugal passenger missed his flight due to very long security lines at Lisbon Airport. That’s super frustrating, since it’s not like he was cutting it close, so this could’ve happened to any reasonable person. While it’s frustrating to miss your flight in this situation to begin with, what makes it even worse is that he was forced to buy another ticket, since European carriers don’t generally just roll your ticket over to the next flight.

Is there any good advice that I’m missing, or what do you make of this situation?

Conversations (88)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

James Wilkins Guest

This happened to me just yesterday, and honestly, I’m still trying to decide whether to laugh or cry about it. My friends and I arrived at the airport a very respectable 3.2 hours before departure, because we’re those people who like to do things “properly.” The departure gate, however, didn’t make its grand appearance on the board until just 1 hour and 20 minutes before takeoff. Naturally, we headed straight there and joined the queue. The board confidently told us the wait time was 21 minutes. Ten minutes later, we checked with a staff member, who casually upgraded that estimate to “about 40 minutes”, delivered with all the urgency of someone discussing the weather. When we expressed concern about potentially missing our flight, we were simply told we should have arrived earlier. (Short of camping overnight at the terminal, I’m not quite sure what more we could have done.) So, in true British fashion, we politely asked everyone ahead of us if we could move forward due to our imminent departure. To their credit, people were incredibly kind, we must have passed around 300 people in the queue. Even so, it still took us nearly an 1.2 to reach the front. By that point, a small community of about 30 equally doomed passengers had formed around us. And just when we thought we’d made it, border control decided to slow things down further, apparently unimpressed with our crowd-sourced queue advancement (despite us asking everyone politely). The grand finale? Security held us up at the front, with a level of rudeness and indifference that would be almost impressive if it weren’t so frustrating… and yes, all 30 of us missed the flight. All in all, a masterclass in how to do everything right and still lose. The politeness of the security team was that of rival fans at a Football Derby. The organisation of Lisbon security checks was as good as a toddlers toy box after a birthday party. Whole heartedly felt like a solid two fingers to the Brits and non EU nations. Fundamentally, airlines don't care as you have to buy another ticket more money in their pockets, and the airport don't care as when their shift finishs they go home and you spend more money in their strategically based vending machines. Toddlers and children weren't allowed to skip the que, but my advice to anyone is arrive at the airport early, ask for special assistance in a wheelchair and you will be escorted to the front.

0
‼ 0
Wendy Guest

This has been going on at Lisbon, faro and Porto for the past 12 months. And reading between the lines the border staff are making a point ie understaffed and underpaid, the government don’t care and we passengers suffer. We were ‘prevented’ boarding our flight in Lisbon on 27.3.26. We need main stream media to make a lot of noise about this.

0
‼ 0
FL360 Guest

Actually you were not quite right in your advice to the passenger. EU261 requires the passenger to "present themselves for check-in" within the stated deadlines. If the passenger is denied boarding despite doing so, this amounts to involuntarily denied boarding with the associated rights to compensation, rebooking, and food/drink etc. during the delay. Only if the airline can demonstrate there were "adequate grounds" to deny boarding can they avoid the above liabilities. It has previously been held in the Scottish case of Caldwell v EasyJet (https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/media/cz3jdack/2015scedin64-niall-caldwell-and-another-against-easyjet-airline-company-limited.pdf) that although security queues are the airport's responsibility, airlines still have a responsibility to ensure passengers with imminent flights are prioritised. Therefore the Caldwells were awarded IDB compensation and expenses. Obviously a Scottish precedent is not binding in Portugal or Belgium, but it illustrates how a judge in those countries may interpret EU261 (the case was decided pre-Brexit). So it is definitely worth the OP's while pursuing TAP through any Alternative Dispute Resolution scheme they take part in, and ultimately through legal action if that fails.

0
‼ 0
BBK Guest

Oh wait! a mostly socialist country with a state run airline (inefficient) with no customer protection culture, who would have thought? (Reminds me of Venezuela). So our full time TDS thought leader commenter who tells us every time that the US need to adopt the airline customer protections of the poor Europe was lying to us? I've encountered this situation many many times in the US and I never been remotely tried to be ripped off like this case.

0
‼ 0
AK Guest

I literally cancelled a trip to Portugal last month because I saw too many of these stories and was afraid of missing a connection to Madeira and getting stuck. I was in Milan a few months ago and we had an exorbitant wait through immigration. We were ok but a lot of passengers were not and were very distressed. The staff let everyone with an imminent flight cut the line...EXCEPT Americans. Never experienced anything like that before. On some level I get it but it made me sad. They were still working out issues with the E-gates which we did get to use and worked well if you got to them. I'll probably avoid most of Europe for the rest of this year until they iron out all the EES issues. Once everything is up and running I think it will be ok but right now they are working out a lot of bugs. My understanding is that TAP allows you to reactivate a ticket in the case of a no show by subtracting a fee. Then you can use the remaining credit toward a new ticket. If that wasn't offered to the passenger, he certainly should reach out to TAP because they should have at least offered him the remaining value of the ticket after the no show fee, toward a new booking.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published