Hong Kong Government Takes Stake In Cathay Pacific

It goes without saying that the past year has been particularly tough for Cathay Pacific. First Hong Kong faced massive protests, and then the coronavirus pandemic started. Cathay Pacific has been struggling to stay afloat, though at least there’s some good news for the airline.

Cathay Pacific gets $5 billion recapitalization

It has today been announced that Cathay Pacific will be getting up to 39 billion HKD (~5 billion USD) in funding, comprised of three tranches:

  • Cathay Pacific will issue 19.5 billion HKD in preference shares with detachable warrants to the Hong Kong government after requisite shareholders’ approval has been obtained
  • Cathay Pacific will launch an 11.7 billion HKD rights issue of shares to existing shareholders after requisite shareholders’ approval has been obtained
  • The Hong Kong government will provide a 7.8 billion HKD bridge loan facility to Cathay Pacific, available for drawdown immediately

The Hong Kong government will take a stake in Cathay Pacific

As it’s described, this funding will provide Cathay Pacific with sufficient capital to withstand the current downturn, and a stable financial platform from which it will be able to conduct the review of operations required to transform the business to reflect the new global travel market dynamics.

Beyond this additional 39 billion HKD in funding, Cathay Pacific may explore other opportunities to improve its capital structure, including accessing equity and debt capital markets in order to strengthen the company’s balance sheets.

The Hong Kong government will have a roughly 6% stake in Cathay Pacific, and is only planning on maintaining that stake in Cathay Pacific for at most five years, so this won’t be a long term investment. It’s also interesting to note that the government isn’t considering any further investments in airlines in Hong Kong, so Hong Kong Airlines won’t be getting any funding.

Struggling Hong Kong Airlines won’t get any help from the government

Cathay Pacific’s business model under review

By the fourth quarter of 2020, Cathay Pacific’s management team will recommend to the board the optimum size and shape of the Cathay Pacific Group going forward. A lot is under review at Cathay Pacific:

  • Will Cathay Pacific remain a premium airline, or could it become more low cost?
  • What will Cathay Pacific’s future fleet look like, and in particular what will happen to the 21 Boeing 777-9s that the company has on order?
  • Will Cathay Dragon remain a separate subsidiary, or are there options for the two airlines to work more closely together?

As Cathay Pacific Chairman Patrick Healy describes the situation:

“We are in a very dynamic situation. We need to make the right decisions to adapt to the new reality of global aviation and secure our long-term future. This will require re-evaluating all aspects of our business model in light of the rapidly changing macro and industry dynamics.

Inevitably this will involve rationalisation of future planned capacity compared to our pre-crisis plans, taking into account the market outlook and cost structure at that time.

Tough decisions will need to be made in the fourth quarter of this year to get Cathay Pacific to the right size and shape in which to compete successfully and thrive in this new environment. But once we have right-sized the airlines to adapt to our new reality, our long-term prospects remain as bright as ever, with an outstanding 70-year-old brand, a world-beating premium service offering through Cathay Pacific and Cathay Dragon, together with a newly acquired low-cost carrier in HK Express with a very exciting future, and an unrivalled position in the Greater Bay Area, a region which will be the growth engine for the world economy over the next few decades. Our short-term challenges are significant, but our long-term future remains bright.”

Could we see Cathay Pacific making changes to first class?

Bottom line

Cathay Pacific has had an incredibly rough year, between protests and then coronavirus. The airline has seen a 99% drop in revenue, as aviation to & from Hong Kong has more or less come to a stop.

It’s good to see that the airline is getting some support from the government, which will ensure that it can remain in business.

Now the big question is what Cathay Pacific will look like long-term, as the entire business is under review. This could have impacts on the business model, fleet, subsidiaries, products, and more.

Do you think this business review will lead to significant changes at Cathay Pacific?

Conversations (35)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

onettoomuch Guest

Oh enough with this sentimentalizaton already, folks in the comment section. CA and CX have been mutual shareholders (30%) for a decade or so... If this ship has sailed it sailed a long time ago. Getting a government bailout this time does not change the airline’s already close relationship to Beijing. Cathay’s been making decisions these past few months almost like they knew this bailout was definitely happening, at least to me it seems. Need anyone be reminded that Cathay is owned by (and a significant part of) Swire or Swire’s huge footprint in China? On that mark, posting angry comments at the CCP and having heated debate about honestly the more insignificant degeneration on the situation in Hong Kong and somehow making this revolves around the US’ move to ‘derecognize’ Hong Kong (I use the quotes because DT’s order was vague and in-executable and was more like the most recent bluff to flash at Beijing, at least for now) is probably just and reasonable and sweet, but it is too little and it is about 12 years too late.

0
‼ 0
Jkjkjk Guest

MKLDH, Exactly Too many hypocrites... US has so many allies with countries with questionable human right records but they seem to have worst sentiment for anything chinese and make it worst in the world. Hats off to them though. Seems like the propaganda is at least working.

0
‼ 0
MKLDH Gold

I had no problem flying CX First during this sh*tshow of HK, and I will continue to do so after this bailout as long as the service quality remains good. Does anyone really care about the so-called human rights issue, especially when you are pursuing luxury travels all over the world? As far as I concern countries like Turkey, UAE or Qatar are also no role models for human rights problems, but I don't see people taking issues with flying TK, EK, or QR. Admit your hypocrisy and stop yelling for things that have nothing to do with you.

0
‼ 0
Jkjkjk Guest

@Darren CIA enhanced interrogation techniques is not torture, it’s interrogation. Chinese concentration camp is TORTURE AND AGAINST HUMAN RIGHTS. You don’t see the hypocrisy here? Patriot act basically allow anyone including us citizens to be picked up without due process and can be put in blacksite. You’re the blind followers. All I see is that US created havoc in many part of the world. They only worry about HK not because they stand for human rights but because they’re threatened by China emergence as a global super power. Stop being blinded by your government. I’m not chinese and not american. In fact i was a victim for both government. US government installed a dictator in my country regardless his human rights record. They just want pro US dictator. I just said I like singapore PAP not the CCP. They have more economic freedom than americans.

0
‼ 0
Darren Guest

@ jkjkjk Alright now we know your love to communist chinese nationalism who enjoys being totured, humiliated, patronised. I do not like SM! I despised people who have not got any "self worth" and wish to be a "blind follower" for the rest of their lives. We know how SIN works. It is a fine destination for holiday and for people who likes to park their millions away from their tax authorities! In away SIN is not so different in some ways to a totalitarian regime. They just know how to sell to its people and the foreigners alike. My love for chinese food and HK does not make me a blind over exited blinded communist pet dog! @eskimo What are you smoking up there in your igloo! Brainwashed by whom? You sound more like a chinese commie bot who hates to hear bad but truthful things about china. @ ichan +1 Sorry to hear such pain in your words. HKers will never stand alone. The west has an eye directly to china. Not everytime is christmas for the CCP.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published