Aer Lingus & Iberia...
 

Aer Lingus & Iberia Order A321XLR

28 Posts
12 Users
0 Reactions
561 Views
Posts: 40733
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#9534]
wpf-cross-image

Yesterday Airbus formally launched the A321XLR, which is the new longest range single aisle plane in the world, and which I think will be immensely popular with airlines. The A321XLR will launch in 2023 and will have a range of 5,400 miles, giving it 15% more range than the A321LR, which has already been popular…

Continue reading: Aer Lingus & Iberia Order A321XLR

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


27 Replies
27 Replies
Gold
(@dennis-r)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Speaking on Aer Lingus, have to say it does suit their business structure. I can see a bunch of North American routes opening up for them. Please Please, Please, just make these planes comfortable!


Reply
(@Steven)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 35

Do you think that there is actual growth that is occurring from this new type (A321XLR) or are we just going to see the disappearance of the hub and spoke model as these aircraft's are now able to fly a small O&D market


Reply
Gold
(@ladakn99)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised to see routes like DFW-MAD or IAH-DUB open up thanks to this aircraft. I'm kind of surprised that none of these will go towards Level. If you're going to do low cost long haul, this would be the jet to do it with IMO.


Reply
 LM
(@LM)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 95

I heard Middle Eastern Airlines also ordered this plane.


Reply
Diamond
(@lukas-3)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 351

"Game changer."


Reply
 ralf
(@ralf)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 25

DUB-PDX I bet


Reply
 CA
(@CA)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

As much as this is good for conectivity, I don't like the idea of long haul trips in single aisle planes.

What will be te future of business class seats for these type of planes? Where will all aisle access go?


Reply
(@gboac)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 437

OTOH while the 787 and A350 did open the door for long distance thin routes, they are still wide body jets. I personally don't look forward to spending 10-15 hours in a narrow body jet. However YMMV


Reply
(@Abuelinho)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

My bet is that Iberia will use this planes mainly on Central & South America routes.


Reply
 RKC
(@rkc)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I can see Aer Lingus doing DUB-PHX


Reply
(@Don Knight)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

Game-changer? More like misery machine. You really want to sit in this small plane on a flight from LA to Dublin or from Denver to Madrid? I sure don't.

This plane might be popular with the airlines. It's gonna be hated by passengers.


Reply
 DT
(@DT)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 154

What about JetBlue? This will allow them to go much further into Europe from JFK or BOS than London.


Reply
(@Phil Duncan)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 159

Great news, Aer Lingus are already a great westbound option from Europe given the US pre-clearance at Dublin which saves so much time on arrival. I'm really looking forward to seeing which markets these planes open up.

Given that Airbus have made such leaps and bounds in cabin noise reduction, air quality and pressure with the A350 I hope that will be transferred to the A321XLR and the experience will be unmatched.


Reply
(@aj-montana)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

speaking of IAG, they just announced a 200 Boeing 737MAX order for LEVEL and Vueling


Reply
Gold
(@ben-holz)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 290

I presume they will use them to expand in the US/Mexico and maybe Central America/ Colombia/ Brazil. Another possible, but more unlikely, scenario would be operating ex-minor Spanish markets during peak season (AGP/PMI-JFK on summer), but almost certainly not BCN.

As much as I am keen to know what IB will do with these, I am probably scared than anything. Their short-haul planes are dreadful. They have some of the worst legroom in Europe (if not the worst) and their slimline seats make 3 hour flights feel like an eternity. Being the cheapos they are I am sure they won’t even install proper business class seats. I just hope the Y seat pitch and padding are better than what they currently are.


Reply
 Rob
(@Rob)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 42

The XLR will NOT hit the west coast from Europe it will not make it much further than ORD. The 4700nm listed as the range is still air. For an operational range take about 20% of of that. That makes its west bound range a max of 3900, maybe in the winter with stronger winds could be be more like 3500 nm.


Reply
(@Mirza Ahmed)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 20

I'm hoping someone (JetBlue?) uses it to launch East Coast to Hawaii flights. I know they codeshare with HA, but one flight a day from JFK and BOS isn't enough, and I refuse to fly UA out of EWR.


Reply
(@WilliamsB747)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 3

I would personally hate any flight over 5 hours in any of narrow body but 90% of the traveling public would have no clue what they’re travelling on until they board the plane. Maybe with Iberia’s new order they would keep their JNB service but now with an a321 instead of a330.


Reply
Diamond
(@pierre-2)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 525

One can actually wonder why Boeing even bothers with the NMA


Reply
(@Colin)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 129

Ben - Where are you seeing the referenced 5400nm range?


Reply
(@Pedro)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 5

Thanks for sharing that range map. I’m a frequent flyer in the SEA-MAD route. There are no direct flights and l always have to take connections that make my journey 4-7 hours longer than a hypothetical direct flight. Thinking that that direct route could hardly be served with a narrow-body aircraft is insane.


Reply
 Jeff
(@Jeff)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 72

I will be very curious to know how they configure these planes. The dense narrow body configs we see today are somewhat tolerable for 1-3 domestic hops during the daytime. They're useless for transcontinental red-eyes. Traversing 4-8 time zones changes the way passengers interact with aircraft. Sleeping, eating, and using the restroom become much more important.

The only reasonably comfortable narrow body I've been on in recent years was an internationally-configured JAL 737-800. 145 seats.

Compare this to other "domestically" configured 737-800s
Delta: 160
American: 172
Southwest: 175
KLM: 186
Ryanair: 189

Where I think these A321XLRs could really shine are for connecting European cities to the Middle East and South Asia. These could be a huge threat to the ME3 if secondary cities can bypass their hubs. These would have superior schedules, frequency, and better opportunities for onward connections throughout Europe.


Reply
(@jeffsj)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Could these planes use from East coast open the door for a few more nonstops from the west coast to more European destinations for the bigger players? They don’t seem to be ordering them now but I wonder. Being one that flies out of LAX and SFO options are pretty limited NS comparing to East coast, especially one world. Just a thought(hope)


Reply
Diamond
(@aaron-3)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

EI has used a narrow body plane (757-200) before for long haul routes, like DUB-IAD, for example. So it isn't like there hasn't been some sort of precedence for flights like this. For some people, a few extra hours on longer flights than that might be acceptable, especially if the price is right.


Reply
(@Daniel)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

I guess IB will start to fly to NE Brazil again. They briefly served FOR and REC with Airbus 343 some years back on a triangular route but the route was not economical. With an A321XLR they might well launch MAD-REC/FOR/SSA/NAT or even secondary cities in Brazil that are not in the NE like BSB/CNF and VCP. If IB launches these flights this might be a real nightmare for TP. Until AF/KL launched FOR they were virtually alone in the Europe/NE Brazil market (DE links FRA to FOR and REC once a week each only).
Other markets for IB are new cities in the US, as well as adjusting capacities to the Caribbean and existing US routes like BOS and IAD....


Reply
 ARM
(@ARM)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 16

I would love to see Iberia fly out to MCO and perhaps some other AA hubs and some Western US cities.
For Latin America I guess they can fly to secondary cities, since I think all the capitals and major cities are already covered on the IB network


Reply
(@Leonardo G)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

I don't agree that long flights in single aisle airplanes are bad. It all depends of the configuration that the company chooses. As I live in Ireland, I use Aer Lingus from time to time
and I can guarantee that the A320's seat comfort and leg room are much better than several
wide bodies from another companies, I'm tall and big, 1,87 and 140kg, and I feel much more
comfortable on the Aer Lingus A320 than on KLM 777-300 for example(Economy class on
both obviously). To be honest the Aer Lingus A320 is one of the best economy class I've ever flown, and I flew a lot in my life, more than 300 times for work or leisure and many transcontinental flights.


Reply